The article reveals the importance of inclusive education through mass events with children with developmental disabilities and normotypical children. The issues on the formation of a tolerant attitude towards all participants in the educational process are considered.
Статья посвящена одной из наиболее острых проблем современной обще- ственной политической жизни Российской Федерации, распространению идей экстремизма и ксенофобии, формированию толерантного сознания в полиэтни- ческой и поликонфессиональной среде. ; The article deals with one of the pressing problems of contemporary social and political life in Russian Federation - spreading of extremism and xenophobia, mouldering tolerant consciousness in multiethnic and multyconfessional environment.
There is a lack of tolerance in post-Soviet Lithuania and it manifest itself in various spheres of social life. Tolerance is a humanistic value, closely related to the democracy, respect of the human person, human rights and freedom. The analysis of tolerance understanding of outstanding Lithuanian philosophers and pedagogues helps to reveal main elements and the structure of this important value. The urge to teach tolerance in secondary schools is evident. Some factors, important in teaching tolerance, like family, school life, and various youth organisations are discussed.
There is a lack of tolerance in post-Soviet Lithuania and it manifest itself in various spheres of social life. Tolerance is a humanistic value, closely related to the democracy, respect of the human person, human rights and freedom. The analysis of tolerance understanding of outstanding Lithuanian philosophers and pedagogues helps to reveal main elements and the structure of this important value. The urge to teach tolerance in secondary schools is evident. Some factors, important in teaching tolerance, like family, school life, and various youth organisations are discussed.
There is a lack of tolerance in post-Soviet Lithuania and it manifest itself in various spheres of social life. Tolerance is a humanistic value, closely related to the democracy, respect of the human person, human rights and freedom. The analysis of tolerance understanding of outstanding Lithuanian philosophers and pedagogues helps to reveal main elements and the structure of this important value. The urge to teach tolerance in secondary schools is evident. Some factors, important in teaching tolerance, like family, school life, and various youth organisations are discussed.
There is a lack of tolerance in post-Soviet Lithuania and it manifest itself in various spheres of social life. Tolerance is a humanistic value, closely related to the democracy, respect of the human person, human rights and freedom. The analysis of tolerance understanding of outstanding Lithuanian philosophers and pedagogues helps to reveal main elements and the structure of this important value. The urge to teach tolerance in secondary schools is evident. Some factors, important in teaching tolerance, like family, school life, and various youth organisations are discussed.
This article is devoted to the analysis of tolerance towards national minorities in Lithuania. The article combines the analysis of the phenomenon of tolerance as a core social value and the analysis of empirical evidence of tolerance in the Lithuanian society. The scientific investigation of empirical situation is based on the secondary analysis of sociological data. Tolerance is one of the social values that are present and protected in modern multicultural democratic societies. Even thought the level of social tolerance varies from country to country and within time periods, Europe remains a perfect example of practices of social tolerance. In general, the level of tolerance is altering and depends on many factors, such as the level of urbanisation, multiculturalism, historical development, the development of the state, etc. In this article, the factors of multiculturalism and urbanisation are analysed in a more precise manner. Lithuania, due to its historical experience and geopolitical situation, is one of the European countries that are multicultural and have a long history of national minorities living in the country. According to the data of sociological research, the majority of the Lithuanian population is tolerant towards national minorities. Even though one third of the population express some kind of negative attitudes towards national minorities, it is necessary to stress that these negative attitudes are almost absent in everyday life of the society.
This article is devoted to the analysis of tolerance towards national minorities in Lithuania. The article combines the analysis of the phenomenon of tolerance as a core social value and the analysis of empirical evidence of tolerance in the Lithuanian society. The scientific investigation of empirical situation is based on the secondary analysis of sociological data. Tolerance is one of the social values that are present and protected in modern multicultural democratic societies. Even thought the level of social tolerance varies from country to country and within time periods, Europe remains a perfect example of practices of social tolerance. In general, the level of tolerance is altering and depends on many factors, such as the level of urbanisation, multiculturalism, historical development, the development of the state, etc. In this article, the factors of multiculturalism and urbanisation are analysed in a more precise manner. Lithuania, due to its historical experience and geopolitical situation, is one of the European countries that are multicultural and have a long history of national minorities living in the country. According to the data of sociological research, the majority of the Lithuanian population is tolerant towards national minorities. Even though one third of the population express some kind of negative attitudes towards national minorities, it is necessary to stress that these negative attitudes are almost absent in everyday life of the society.
This article touches upon the world-scale policy which is being carried on providing tolerance and tranquility, plus accomplishing international political-legal basis, as well as effective cooperation and international initiatives of Uzbekistan with UNESCO
Статья посвящена современным проблемам формирования религиозной толерантности. Анализируются некоторые аспекты религиозной толерантности и межэтнических отношений в Узбекистане.Автор анализирует, механизмы формирования религиозной толерантности связанные со всей системой общественных отношений, с возможностью полноценной реализации конституционно-демократических прав и свобод, с уровнем духовной культуры личности и социума. Проводится анализ условий развития узбекской этноконфессиональной среды, выделяются векторы государственной политики в отношении данного феномена, определяется значение толерантности в отношении существующих конфессий для формирования конструктивного поля диалога.
The article deals with the problem of tolerance in the aspect of its substantial features in the Russian students. The student's period is a further development of the individual in the direction of expansion of representations about social competence, development of social interaction culture, respect for different social groups. The character of the empirically identified intergroup similarity is determined by the age-specific features of studentship as a youth group, a crucial age of the tasks associated with interpersonal and intergenerational communication, political apathy, lack of interest in the field of ethno-cultural social reality. It is shown that tolerance as respect, acceptance and appreciation of other cultures, ways of expression and manifestation of the human personality of the students is fully formed. It is revealed that in the structure of tolerance of students ethical, cognitive, affective components predominate, the least represented components being conative, need-motivation, active, stylistic, identificational and group ones. It was found out that content of tolerance is characterized by regional specificity as environmental factor. ; Статья посвящена проблеме толерантности в аспекте ее содержательных особенностей у российских студентов. В студенческий период происходит дальнейшее развитие личности в направлении расширения представлений о социальной компетентности, развития культуры социального взаимодействия, уважительного отношения к различным социальным группам. Характер эмпирически выявленного межгруппового сходства обусловлен возрастной спецификой студенчества как молодежной группы, решающей задачи возраста, связанные с межличностным и межпоколенческим общением, аполитичностью, отсутствием интереса к этнокультурной области социальной реальности. Характер выявленных различий свидетельствует о региональных социально-экономических и культурных особенностях, влияющих на формирование области интересов и предпочтений. Показано, что толерантность как уважение, принятие и правильное понимание других культур, способов самовыражения и проявления человеческой индивидуальности у студентов полностью сформирована на уровне видов толерантности. Выявлено, что в структуре толерантности у студентов наиболее представлены этико-нормативный, когнитивный, аффективный компоненты, наименее – конативный, потребностно-мотивационный, деятельностно-стилевой, идентификационно-групповой. Выявлено, что содержание толерантности характеризуется региональной спецификой, которая играет роль средового фактора.
В статье дан краткий исторический анализ понятию толерантность. В современном обществе толерантность чаще всего имеет религиозную и духовную направленность. При этом немаловажную роль занимает смещение вектора толерантности в сторону тоталитаризма. Понятие толерантность как свободомыслие и свобододуховность человека подменяется возвеличиванием, абсолютизацией свободы любой индивидуальности, что ведет к отрицанию моральных принципов и в итоге свобода перейдет во вседозволенность.
International audience ; The need to study this problem is associated with individual contradic- tions in the United Nations (UN) documents and the need to eliminate them. The purpose of the article is to substantiate the advisability of making changes to UN documents due to the incorrect use of the concept of "tolerance" and its analogues, including in Russian versions. In the main part of the study, the authors, on the basis of their comparative anal- ysis of the content of the UN General Assembly Resolutions, in terms of the use of the concept of "tolerance", come to the discovery of two groups of contradictions in UN doc- uments that require resolution. The authors examine these two groups of contradictions in detail, noting their characteristic features. Universal human rights take priority over the rights of people determined by their racial, religious, ethnic affiliation, as well as other immanent features. The social contradictions that have worsened against the background of the COVID-19 pandemic have led to a number of conflicts based on hostility towards carriers of "otherness". The events of 2020 have shown that it is imperative to introduce "harmony in diversity" into the relationships between people with different immanent features. The international political and legal institute, designated in the working lan- guages of the United Nations by the terms "tolerance" and "la tolerance", is designed to provide this harmony. Meanwhile, at present there are many circumstances that prevent the implementation of the idea of "tolerance" ("la tolérance"). The most important of them is the lack of a clear position in official UN documents regarding the content of the idea. The analysis of UN documents, including the Russian-language versions, revealed contradictions in the use of the concept of "tolerance" ("la tolérance") and its analogues. Thus, the concept of "tolerance" ("la tolerance") is still used in UN documents in the meaning contained in the UN Charter. Meanwhile, in 1995, UNESCO, on behalf of the ...
This article aims at more or less coherent reproduction of and reflection upon key philosophical ideas discussed at "Rethinking tolerance as a virtue, political demand and moral character" conference, which was held at Karl-Franzens University of Graz, Austria, 5-6 October 2018. Specificity of tolerance, its supererogatory character, limits and justification are in the focus of the paper.Key words: toleration, conflict and concord, D. Heyd, R. Forst, J. Derrida, supererogation, ethic gesture, neutrality and respect, liberals, communitarians. ; Статья представляет собой попытку рефлексивного изложения основных идей, озвученных участниками конференции «Переосмысливая толерантность как политическое требование, моральную добродетель и идеал поведения», проходившей 5–6 октября 2018 г. в департаменте философии университета Карла – Франца г. Грац, Австрия. Последовательно рассматриваются вопросы о специфике, механизме, границах и обосновании толерантного отношения.Ключевые слова: толерантность, согласие, конфликт, Д. Хейд, Р. Форст, Ж. Деррида, коммунитаристы и либералы, уважение, безразличие, избыток, жест.
This paper examines possibility to use fantasy movies in education of tolerance. Tolerance problem is very relevant nowadays, especially when it is being considered in relationship with latter political and social events. Also it is very inportant to find an appropriate tool for increasing tolerance of contemporary young people. This paper connects relevance of tolerance and attracness of hipotetical teaching tool – fantasy movies. It was determined that fantasy movies can be used to teach tolerance, also the list of appropriate for teaching tolerance fantasy moviesi is given.