Managing Crises in the Twenty-First Century
In: International studies review, Band 6, Heft 1, S. 165-194
ISSN: 1521-9488
From 6 Aug to 10 Aug 2003, three institutes engaged in the study of how crises are managed -- the Crisis Management Research & Training (CRISMART) program located in the Swedish National Defence Coll, the Crisis Research Center at Leiden U, & the Transboundary Crisis Management Working Group at Syracuse U -- held a conference at the Minnowbrook Conference Center in the Adirondack Mountains. In Lessons from Crisis Research, Arjen Boin speaks about the new forms of crisis that are appearing on the horizon even as governments struggle with the existing ones. Modern crises that jump around between local, national, & international levels are clearly a challenge for national governments. Crisis is defined from two perspectives -- operationally & politically symbolically. Insights obtained from past research on crisis management are summarized. Crisis management research requires a multidisciplinary approach, its own professional associations & journals, & the creation of centers of excellence. In Crises as Ill-Structured Messes, Ian I. Mitroff, Murat C. Alpaslan, & Sandy E. Green contend that the field of crisis management has been impeded by its out-of-date views of the nature of crisis & the use of inappropriate research concepts. Definitions & inquiry systems need development. A systems model of crisis is presented to help in this regard. In Policy Advice as Crisis: A Political Redefinition of Crisis Management, Alexander Kouzmin & Alan M. G. Jarman review the works of four authors who have contributed to the field of policy advice on crisis management. This advice covers approaches from language/logic to forecasting/system feedback/analysis. Four advice types -- policy innovation, gatekeeping, guardianship, & gurus -- & their topics are described. 3 Figures, 132 References. M. Pflum