Kwaliteitsrekening en Trust (Trust Accounts)
In: I. Peeters and A. Verbeke, Kwaliteitsrekening en trust (trust accounts), in Dossier voorrechten en hypotheken (Dossier Priviliges and mortgages), Antwerp, Kluwer, 1999, p. 139-161.
27950 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: I. Peeters and A. Verbeke, Kwaliteitsrekening en trust (trust accounts), in Dossier voorrechten en hypotheken (Dossier Priviliges and mortgages), Antwerp, Kluwer, 1999, p. 139-161.
SSRN
In: Administration & society, Band 38, Heft 5, S. 573-595
ISSN: 1552-3039
This study assesses the relative importance of administrators' trust in citizens, trust in participation institutions, and propensity to trust in explaining their willingness to involve more citizens in public decision making. The results show that administrators' trust in participation institutions is a mediator between trust in citizens and administrators' promotion of participation activities. Propensity to trust has a positive impact on administrators' trust in citizens, but it does not directly contribute to trust in participation institutions or promotion of participation activities. The results imply that trust in institutional arrangements is at least as important as trust in citizens in explaining administrative behaviors.
In: World Values Research, WVR Volume 5, Number 3, 2012
SSRN
Working paper
In: Fiduciaries and Trust: Ethics, Politics, Economics and Law (Paul B. Miller & Matthew Harding eds., Cambridge University Press 2020)
SSRN
In: Davis, K. & Gardner, H. (2010). Trust: Its conceptualization by scholars, its status with young persons. In R.A. Couto (Ed.), Political and civic leadership: A reference handbook, volume 2 (pp. 602-610). Washington, D.C.: Sage Publications.
SSRN
SSRN
In: Söllner, M.; Benbasat, I.; Gefen, D.; Leimeister, J. M. & Pavlou, P. A. (2016): Trust. In: MIS Quarterly Research Curations, Ashley Bush and Arun Rai, Eds., Erscheinungsjahr/Year: 2016.
SSRN
In: Peace research abstracts journal, Band 44, Heft 2, S. 573-578
ISSN: 0031-3599
In: Administration & society, Band 38, Heft 5, S. 573-595
ISSN: 0095-3997
In: Developmental science, Band 10, Heft 1, S. 135-138
ISSN: 1467-7687
Abstract Children rely extensively on others' testimony to learn about the world. However, they are not uniformly credulous toward other people. From an early age, children's reliance on testimony is tempered by selective trust in particular informants. Three‐ and 4‐year‐olds monitor the accuracy or knowledge of informants, including those that are familiar. They prefer to seek and endorse information provided by someone who has proved accurate in the past rather than someone who has made mistakes or acknowledged ignorance. Future research is likely to pinpoint other heuristics that children use to filter incoming testimony and may reveal more generalized patterns of trust and mistrust among individual children.
In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, Forthcoming
SSRN
SSRN
Working paper
In: The journal of psychology: interdisciplinary and applied, Band 143, Heft 1, S. 45-66
ISSN: 1940-1019
In: The International journal of conflict management: IJCMA, Band 32, Heft 5, S. 826-847
ISSN: 1758-8545
PurposeIt is important to infer and diagnose whether a negotiator is trustworthy. In international negotiations, people may assume that high-trust nations are more likely to produce more trustworthy negotiators. Does this assumption hold universally? This study aims to address this research question by investigating the relationship between national-level societal trust and individual-level trust in negotiations.Design/methodology/approachThis study uses a cross-sectional research design and a sample of 910 senior managers from 58 nations or regions. The hypotheses are tested by hierarchical linear modeling.FindingsThis study draws on the dynamic constructivist theory of culture to propose moderated hypotheses. Results show that societal trust predicts individuals' social perceptions of attitudinal trust in negotiations, only when cultural face norms are weak rather than strong; societal trust predicts individuals' social perceptions of behavioral trust in negotiations (i.e. high information sharing and low competitive behavior), only when negotiators process information analytically rather than holistically.Originality/valueThis study is the first to examine the relationship between national-level societal trust (i.e. generalized trust) and individual-level trust in negotiations (i.e. particularistic trust). It uses a large-scale, multinational sample to show that relying on societal trust to infer trust in negotiations is valid only in Western societies.
In: American political science review, Band 3, Heft 1, S. 85-86
ISSN: 1537-5943