Unipolarity Without Hegemony
In: International studies review, Band 1, Heft 2, S. 141-172
ISSN: 1468-2486
54 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: International studies review, Band 1, Heft 2, S. 141-172
ISSN: 1468-2486
In: International studies review, Band 1, Heft 2, S. 141
ISSN: 1521-9488
In: Millennium: journal of international studies, Band 30, Heft 2, S. 430-431
ISSN: 0305-8298
In: American political science review, Band 96, Heft 1, S. 263-264
ISSN: 0003-0554
In: Cooperation and conflict: journal of the Nordic International Studies Association, Band 37, Heft 2, S. 233-236
ISSN: 0010-8367
In: World affairs: the journal of international issues, Band 7, Heft 3, S. 28-41
ISSN: 0971-8052
World Affairs Online
In: Third world quarterly, Band 13, Heft 2, S. 255-265
ISSN: 1360-2241
In: Cooperation and conflict: journal of the Nordic International Studies Association, Band 37, Heft 2, S. 233
ISSN: 0010-8367
In: American political science review, Band 96, Heft 1, S. 263
ISSN: 0003-0554
In: Asian journal of political science: AJPS, Band 6, Heft 2, S. 1-20
ISSN: 0218-5377, 0218-5385
This article attempts to portray and characterize Japan's foreign policy as it unfolds under US unipolarity. Based on interviews with members of Japan's governing elite (mostly bureaucrats) as well as scrutiny of academic and journalistic accounts, the article places Japan's foreign policy in global political context and analyses it in terms of the global structures of power, sources of threat to stability, role of intervention and use of force, and the nature of the power structure of the next century. Muddling through the dual uncertainty originating from post-Cold War politics and the relentless tide of globalization, Japan rides somewhat uneasily on US unipolarity, swallowing some bitterness in the process of navigating its path towards the next century. (AJPS/DÜI)
World Affairs Online
The beginning of XXI century was marked by few events that had influence on international relations in the whole world. Terror attacks in the United States of America in September 11, 2001, were the first such high a big range attacks against the USA. It had shown that the USA – the most powerful state of the world – is vulnerable to more danger, than nuclear weapons alone. After September 11 the USA started war against terrorism in Afghanistan, and many states supported it. However, in spring 2003 the USA unilaterally, without international support, decided to use military power in Iraq, arguing that Iraq possessed potential threat – weapons of mass destruction. Unilateralism, and military and technological differences between the USA and its allies have brought to light a presumption that in the international system there is a single pole, a superpower (hyperpower), the United States of America. The existence of one pole only can have different consequences on international system and international security. The aim of this article was to determine specific features of the unipolar world, influence of polarity of international system upon international security, and specific threats to security that emerge only in unipolar international systems. Another aim was to try to predict the end of the unipolar system: what could be the next poles and when could it come to the end. After analysing a number of articles concerning this topic, few conclusions were drawn. Contemporary international system is unipolar and the single pole is the USA; the USA is superior in military, economic, geopolitical, and political spheres at the same time. Increasing military power and unilateralism of the USA may be treated as a threat to international security. Great powers are trying to balance unipolar power, however, the creation of balance to unipolar power is complicated for several reasons.[.].
BASE
The beginning of XXI century was marked by few events that had influence on international relations in the whole world. Terror attacks in the United States of America in September 11, 2001, were the first such high a big range attacks against the USA. It had shown that the USA – the most powerful state of the world – is vulnerable to more danger, than nuclear weapons alone. After September 11 the USA started war against terrorism in Afghanistan, and many states supported it. However, in spring 2003 the USA unilaterally, without international support, decided to use military power in Iraq, arguing that Iraq possessed potential threat – weapons of mass destruction. Unilateralism, and military and technological differences between the USA and its allies have brought to light a presumption that in the international system there is a single pole, a superpower (hyperpower), the United States of America. The existence of one pole only can have different consequences on international system and international security. The aim of this article was to determine specific features of the unipolar world, influence of polarity of international system upon international security, and specific threats to security that emerge only in unipolar international systems. Another aim was to try to predict the end of the unipolar system: what could be the next poles and when could it come to the end. After analysing a number of articles concerning this topic, few conclusions were drawn. Contemporary international system is unipolar and the single pole is the USA; the USA is superior in military, economic, geopolitical, and political spheres at the same time. Increasing military power and unilateralism of the USA may be treated as a threat to international security. Great powers are trying to balance unipolar power, however, the creation of balance to unipolar power is complicated for several reasons.[.].
BASE
The beginning of XXI century was marked by few events that had influence on international relations in the whole world. Terror attacks in the United States of America in September 11, 2001, were the first such high a big range attacks against the USA. It had shown that the USA – the most powerful state of the world – is vulnerable to more danger, than nuclear weapons alone. After September 11 the USA started war against terrorism in Afghanistan, and many states supported it. However, in spring 2003 the USA unilaterally, without international support, decided to use military power in Iraq, arguing that Iraq possessed potential threat – weapons of mass destruction. Unilateralism, and military and technological differences between the USA and its allies have brought to light a presumption that in the international system there is a single pole, a superpower (hyperpower), the United States of America. The existence of one pole only can have different consequences on international system and international security. The aim of this article was to determine specific features of the unipolar world, influence of polarity of international system upon international security, and specific threats to security that emerge only in unipolar international systems. Another aim was to try to predict the end of the unipolar system: what could be the next poles and when could it come to the end. After analysing a number of articles concerning this topic, few conclusions were drawn. Contemporary international system is unipolar and the single pole is the USA; the USA is superior in military, economic, geopolitical, and political spheres at the same time. Increasing military power and unilateralism of the USA may be treated as a threat to international security. Great powers are trying to balance unipolar power, however, the creation of balance to unipolar power is complicated for several reasons.[.].
BASE
In: Asian journal of political science, Band 6, Heft 2, S. 1-20
ISSN: 1750-7812