Circulations, Fabrications and Uses of Law; Circulations, fabriques et usages du droit
In: Genre, sexualité & société, Issue 15
ISSN: 2104-3736
516130 results
Sort by:
In: Genre, sexualité & société, Issue 15
ISSN: 2104-3736
In: Social research: an international quarterly, Volume 22, p. 297-324
ISSN: 0037-783X
In: THE PRESIDENCY OF GEORGE W. BUSH: A FIRST HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT, Julian Zelizer, ed., Princeton University Press, 2010
SSRN
In: Political and legal anthropology review: PoLAR, Volume 27, Issue 2, p. 135-137
ISSN: 1555-2934
Droit et Cultures, special issue 2004, "Images and Uses of Law among Ordinary People"Edited by Chantal Kourilsky‐Augeven (Paris: Société de Législation Comparée)
In: Oñati Socio-Legal Series, Volume 1, Issue 4
SSRN
In: History workshop journal: HWJ, Volume 65, Issue 1, p. 65-78
ISSN: 1477-4569
In: Representations, No. 82, pp. 24-51, Spring 2003
SSRN
In: "The Uses of Law for the Formation of Character: A Classic Protestant Doctrine for Late-Modern Liberal Societies?" in Michael Welker, et al., eds., The Impact of Religion on Character Formation in Late Modern Societies (Leipzig: Evangelische Verlagsanhalt, 2020), 261-283
SSRN
In: Canadian journal of law and society: Revue canadienne de droit et société, Volume 10, Issue 2, p. 129-154
ISSN: 1911-0227
AbstractCultural appropriation involves the unauthorized use of elements of another culture (e.g., voice, practices, image or name) to the appropriator's commercial advantage. Cultural appropriation is experienced by some Native American cultures as an attack on their integrity which jeopardizes their very survival. The case of the Hopi Indians of Arizona is examined. The essay goes on to explore and evaluate various recourses which Native American peoples might employ to check the vulgarization and commercialization of their culture—namely the right to privacy, copyright, and the right of publicity. It is concluded that, to maximize cultural preservation, the right of publicity should be deployed.
In: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.35112104358702
"Catalogue of modern law books, pub. and sold . by W. Clarke and sons": 8 p. at end ; Mode of access: Internet. ; Signature of A.F. Leach on lining paper and that of J. Leach on t.p
BASE
In: Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política, Vol. 29 Núm. 1 (2020). Número temático: Política y Justicia en América Latina
SSRN
Working paper
In: Proceedings of the annual meeting / American Society of International Law, Volume 73, p. 294-299
ISSN: 2169-1118
In: Journal of Law and Religion 10 (1994): 433-465 (with Thomas C. Arthur)
SSRN
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Volume 98, Issue 1, p. 82-90
ISSN: 2161-7953
Is international law "irrelevant" to constitutional interpretation in the United States? How could that be? The arguments for categorical ignorance of international law in constitutional adjudication play on exaggerated fears: fear of foreign domination, fear of judicial activism, fear of the unknown. The claim of irrelevance depends on a false dichotomy between excluding international law fromjudicial consideration and allowing foreign institutions to control constitutional meaning. The more sensible inquiry would ask how international law has informed constitutional interpretation in the past, and how it should be used in the future.
During the last quarter of the twentieth century, the humanities and social sciences have turned toward history, something that culminated in the 1990s, and this phenomenon was evident in law as well. However, until recently, law and economics, the most influential post-World War II jurisprudential movement, was historical in its methodology and research agenda. The first objective of this article is to call attention to this neglected characteristic of law and economics and to explain its causes by analyzing its intellectual origins, its methodological causes, and the nature of its interaction with other sub-fields of law and of economics. The second objective of the article is to identify a change-in-the-making and its characteristics. Law and economics scholars have turned to history more often and for new purposes in recent years. The article identifies the set of factors that brought about this turn to history. These factors include: a growing willingness to conduct empirical research; the integration of public choice analysis (which often led to the study of past legislation) into mainstream law and economics; preliminary comparative law and economics studies; a growing interaction between law and economics and new institutional economics; and the importation of the concept of path dependency and of greater awareness of past burdens from other quarters of economic theory. Finally, the article examines the concrete ways in which these developments are being realized, by pointing out the various uses of history evident in specific law and economics studies conducted in recent years. It suggests a classification of this growing literature into six distinct uses of history, four of them emerging only in recent years. The general aim of this article is to enhance awareness among law and economics scholars of the actual and potential uses of history. The article further seeks to connect law-and-economics historical studies to other relevant historical works so that the law and economics inquiry will not be conducted in a disciplinary vacuum. It thus calls to the attention of legal historians and economic historians the new literature published in the field of law and economics. Finally it is also directed at scholars interested in the intellectual history of jurisprudence and in the methodological turn to history in the social sciences.
BASE