Suchergebnisse

The welfare state in the UK & elsewhere is currently caught up in a number of crises. The slowing of economic growth has reduced the resources available for its support & has consequently exposed it to theoretical challenges. In particular, it has been criticized as seeking to fulfill needs that are in fact illimitable. In addition, market & liberation theorists have suggested that the welfare state is hostile to individual autonomy & responsibility, & serves the interests of welfare professionals more than those of the poor. It appears, however, that fundamental changes in policy are less likely than incremental readjustments. The issues raised by this crisis concern the basic nature of the relation of society to state, & of both to the individual. W. H. Stoddard

Interview with U.S. Ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick concerning her domestic policy views.

In the light of neoliberalism & severe economic problems during the early 1990s many observers have feared that the Swedish welfare state would lose its universal & gender-equal profile. In this article we argue that changes of the Swedish welfare state during the 1990s were incremental, rather than fundamental. Cuts & changes have indeed been made, but they do not sum up to a radical restructuring of the welfare state. The core social insurance programs have become more universal, not least thanks to the growing number of women's labor market participation. Also public child care services have expanded rather than decreased. This shows that there is still room for public policy divergence. Even for a small open economy with the highest budget deficit in the OECD in the early 1990s it has been possible to regain control over the national budget without dismantling the welfare state. 2 Tables, 2 Figures, 26 References. Adapted from the source document.

In the light of neoliberalism & severe economic problems during the early 1990s many observers have feared that the Swedish welfare state would lose its universal & gender-equal profile. In this article we argue that changes of the Swedish welfare state during the 1990s were incremental, rather than fundamental. Cuts & changes have indeed been made, but they do not sum up to a radical restructuring of the welfare state. The core social insurance programs have become more universal, not least thanks to the growing number of women's labor market participation. Also public child care services have expanded rather than decreased. This shows that there is still room for public policy divergence. Even for a small open economy with the highest budget deficit in the OECD in the early 1990s it has been possible to regain control over the national budget without dismantling the welfare state. 2 Tables, 2 Figures, 26 References. Adapted from the source document.

Based on papers presented at a Workshop on the Politics of the Welfare State, sponsored jointly by Government and Opposition and the Department of Government, University of Manchester, held in Manchester, England, Sept. 13-14, 1984.