Suchergebnisse

Data --- We have collected English-Odia parallel data for the purposes of NLP research of the Odia language. The data for the parallel corpus was extracted from existing parallel corpora such as OdiEnCorp 1.0 and PMIndia, and books which contain both English and Odia text such as grammar and bilingual literature books. We also included parallel text from multiple public websites such as Odia Wikipedia, Odia digital library, and Odisha Government websites. The parallel corpus covers many domains: the Bible, other literature, Wiki data relating to many topics, Government policies, and general conversation. We have processed the raw data collected from the books, websites, performed sentence alignments (a mix of manual and automatic alignments) and released the corpus in a form suitable for various NLP tasks. Corpus Format --- OdiEnCorp 2.0 is stored in simple tab-delimited plain text files, each with three tab-delimited columns: - a coarse indication of the domain - the English sentence - the corresponding Odia sentence The corpus is shuffled at the level of sentence pairs. The coarse domains are: books . prose text dict . dictionaries and phrasebooks govt . partially formal text odiencorp10 . OdiEnCorp 1.0 (mix of domains) pmindia . PMIndia (the original corpus) wikipedia . sentences and phrases from Wikipedia Data Statistics --- The statistics of the current release are given below. Note that the statistics differ from those reported in the paper due to deduplication at the level of sentence pairs. The deduplication was performed within each of the dev set, test set and training set and taking the coarse domain indication into account. It is still possible that the same sentence pair appears more than once within the same set (dev/test/train) if it came from different domains, and it is also possible that a sentence pair appears in several sets (dev/test/train). Parallel Corpus Statistics --- Dev Dev Dev Test Test Test Train Train Train Sents # EN # OD Sents # EN # OD Sents # EN # OD books 3523 42011 36723 3895 52808 45383 3129 40461 35300 dict 3342 14580 13838 3437 14807 14110 5900 21591 20246 govt - - - - - - 761 15227 13132 odiencorp10 947 21905 19509 1259 28473 24350 26963 704114 602005 pmindia 3836 70282 61099 3836 68695 59876 30687 551657 486636 wikipedia 1896 9388 9385 1917 21381 20951 1930 7087 7122 Total 13544 158166 140554 14344 186164 164670 69370 1340137 1164441 "Sents" are the counts of the sentence pairs in the given set (dev/test/train) and domain (books/dict/.). "# EN" and "# OD" are approximate counts of words (simply space-delimited, without tokenization) in English and Odia The total number of sentence pairs (lines) is 13544+14344+69370=97258. Ignoring the set and domain and deduplicating again, this number drops to 94857. Citation --- If you use this corpus, please cite the following paper: @inproceedings{parida2020odiencorp, title={OdiEnCorp 2.0: Odia-English Parallel Corpus for Machine Translation}, author={Parida, Shantipriya and Dash, Satya Ranjan and Bojar, Ond{\v{r}}ej and Motlicek, Petr and Pattnaik, Priyanka and Mallick, Debasish Kumar}, booktitle={Proceedings of the WILDRE5--5th Workshop on Indian Language Data: Resources and Evaluation}, pages={14--19}, year={2020} }

The article analyses the notes, which were prepared by provisional investigation commissions formed by the Seimas, in which it was suggested that the Seimas should either agree or disagree on the abolition of the immunity of a Member of the Seimas. In the opinion of the author, an analysis of these notes permits to assert that these notes often have essential drawbacks: the notes contain insufficient arguments following which the commission substantiates its proposal that the Seimas should not give its consent to hold a Member of the Seimas criminally liable, to arrest him or restrict he freedom otherwise; at times such notes do not contain any such arguments at all; sometimes the commissions exceed the powers granted to them and undertake functions which are not characteristic of such commissions. The Constitution establishes the immunity of a Member of the Seimas not for the purpose that a Member of the Seimas who committed a crime could avoid criminal liability, but that he would not be held criminally liable in the absence of legal grounds, that he would not be persecuted for political or other similar reasons, and that no influence (which is prohibited by the Constitution) would be exerted on him due to his activity in the capacity of a Member of the Seimas.

The article analyses the notes, which were prepared by provisional investigation commissions formed by the Seimas, in which it was suggested that the Seimas should either agree or disagree on the abolition of the immunity of a Member of the Seimas. In the opinion of the author, an analysis of these notes permits to assert that these notes often have essential drawbacks: the notes contain insufficient arguments following which the commission substantiates its proposal that the Seimas should not give its consent to hold a Member of the Seimas criminally liable, to arrest him or restrict he freedom otherwise; at times such notes do not contain any such arguments at all; sometimes the commissions exceed the powers granted to them and undertake functions which are not characteristic of such commissions. The Constitution establishes the immunity of a Member of the Seimas not for the purpose that a Member of the Seimas who committed a crime could avoid criminal liability, but that he would not be held criminally liable in the absence of legal grounds, that he would not be persecuted for political or other similar reasons, and that no influence (which is prohibited by the Constitution) would be exerted on him due to his activity in the capacity of a Member of the Seimas.