Suchergebnisse

published_or_final_version ; Politics and Public Administration ; Master ; Master of Public Administration

The aim of this article is to present the most important voices on the role of the US in the international order during Donald Trump's presidency in the debate held in the Foreign Affairs. The authors assume that Foreign Affairs expresses the opinions of the most crucial organisation bringing together the elites of American foreign affairs – the Council on Foreign Relations. The paper proposes a hypothesis according to which there is a difference of opinion due to the adopted theoretical perspective regarding Trump's role in the destruction of the liberal international order among the American power elites, even though they agree that the ideological conflict between democratic and authoritarian countries around the world is escalating.

The aim of this article is to present the most important voices on the role of the US in the international order during Donald Trump's presidency in the debate held in the Foreign Affairs. The authors assume that Foreign Affairs expresses the opinions of the most crucial organisation bringing together the elites of American foreign affairs – the Council on Foreign Relations. The paper proposes a hypothesis according to which there is a difference of opinion due to the adopted theoretical perspective regarding Trump's role in the destruction of the liberal international order among the American power elites, even though they agree that the ideological conflict between democratic and authoritarian countries around the world is escalating.

The aim of this article is to present the most important voices on the role of the US in the international order during Donald Trump's presidency in the debate held in the Foreign Affairs. The authors assume that Foreign Affairs expresses the opinions of the most crucial organisation bringing together the elites of American foreign affairs – the Council on Foreign Relations. The paper proposes a hypothesis according to which there is a difference of opinion due to the adopted theoretical perspective regarding Trump's role in the destruction of the liberal international order among the American power elites, even though they agree that the ideological conflict between democratic and authoritarian countries around the world is escalating.

The aim of this article is to present the most important voices on the role of the US in the international order during Donald Trump's presidency in the debate held in the Foreign Affairs. The authors assume that Foreign Affairs expresses the opinions of the most crucial organisation bringing together the elites of American foreign affairs – the Council on Foreign Relations. The paper proposes a hypothesis according to which there is a difference of opinion due to the adopted theoretical perspective regarding Trump's role in the destruction of the liberal international order among the American power elites, even though they agree that the ideological conflict between democratic and authoritarian countries around the world is escalating.

The ratification of international human rights treaties is considered an ordinary act of each State's international relations. However, the denunciation of an international human rights treaty is an act of particular gravity, and therefore limited by both international law and domestic law. This essay analyzes such limits and reviews the few cases of denunciation of international human rights treaties in an effort to demonstrate that it is not a sovereign power that States can exercise without restrictions. The case of Ecuador is examined in light of the constant threats from its government to withdraw from the Inter-American Human Rights Protection System. ; La ratificación de un tratado internacional de derechos humanos es considerada un acto ordinario de las relaciones internacionales de cada Estado. No obstante, la denuncia de un tratado internacional de derechos humanos es un acto de especial gravedad, y en consecuencia se encuentra revestido de límites derivados tanto del derecho internacional como del derecho interno de cada Estado. Este ensayo analiza tales límites y realiza un recuento de los contados casos de denuncia de tratados internacionales de derechos humanos con el afán de demostrar que no se trata de una facultad soberana que los Estados puedan ejercer sin restricciones. De manera particular se menciona el caso de Ecuador a raíz de las constantes amenazas de su gobierno de retirarse del Sistema Interamericano de Protección de Derechos Humanos.