Determinants of icelandic foreign relations
In: Cooperation and conflict: journal of the Nordic International Studies Association, Band 10, Heft 1/2, S. 91-99
ISSN: 0010-8367
119397 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Cooperation and conflict: journal of the Nordic International Studies Association, Band 10, Heft 1/2, S. 91-99
ISSN: 0010-8367
World Affairs Online
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 289, Heft 1, S. 58-65
ISSN: 1552-3349
In: International affairs, Band 19, Heft 12, S. 655-655
ISSN: 1468-2346
In: American political science review, Band 15, Heft 1, S. 1-26
ISSN: 1537-5943
"A treaty entering the Senate is like a bull going into the arena; no one can say just how or when the final blow will fall—but one thing is certain—it will never leave the arena alive." When John Hay put this in his diary he had been secretary of state for six years. During this period he had seen seventeen treaties borne from the Senate, lifeless or so mutilated by amendments that they could not survive. We can pardon the harassed secretary's earlier statement. "The fact that a treaty gives to this country a great, lasting advantage, seems to weigh nothing whatever in the minds of about half the Senators. Personal interest, personal spites, and a contingent chance of petty political advantage are the only motives that cut any ice at present."It is, however, with the objective aspect of Secretary Hay's statement that we are primarily concerned. Statesmen, as others, may occasionally express impatience, but if the practical function of the Senate in treaty making is that of the matador at a bull fight, there are more serious grounds for concern. If its duties resemble those of picadors or banderilleros, the matter is serious enough, and of its goading tactics we have early evidence. Thus, John Quincy Adams writes in his diary: "Mr. Crawford told twice over the story of President Washington's having at an early period of his Administration gone to the Senate with a project of a treaty to be negotiated, and been present at their deliberations upon it. They debated it and proposed alterations, so that when Washington left the Senate-chamber he said he would be damned if he ever went there again. And ever since that time treaties have been negotiated by the Executive before submitting them to the consideration of the Senate."
In: South Asian history and culture
In: Routledge India paperbacks
World Affairs Online
In: Central European history, Band 51, Heft 1, S. 102-107
ISSN: 1569-1616
By now there is not much resistance to the notion that historians of modern Germany should pay heed to events outside the borders of theReichor nation-state (though, even now, Austria and Switzerland often remain an afterthought). At the 2006 annual conference of the German Studies Association in Pittsburgh, Michael Geyer spoke of transnational history as "the new consensus." His keynote address bore the title "Where Germans Dwell"—a clear indication that the subject matter of German history must include transplants such as Jürgen Klinsmann and Arnold Schwarzenegger, as well as the German diaspora of prior centuries. In keeping with this agenda, H. Glenn Penny has played a significant role in organizing scholarship on Germans abroad, whereas Kira Thurman is exploring how African Americans experienced German musical culture. The scope of transnational German history remains vast.
In: The Stateman’s Yearbook; The Statesman’s Yearbook 2016, S. 78-78
In: Internasjonal politikk, Band 60, Heft 1, S. 101-110
ISSN: 0020-577X
In: Pacifica review: peace, security and global change, Band 13, Heft 1, S. 73-90
ISSN: 1469-9974
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 83, Heft 4, S. 736-739
ISSN: 2161-7953
One of the most frequently overstated concepts in American constitutional theory is the "separation" of powers. The Framers of the Constitution began with the proposition that concentration of power was to be avoided. They understood, on the other hand, that if governmental powers and responsibilities were actually set apart, each branch would exercise its powers in isolation from the other coordinate branches, to the detriment of cooperation and accommodation among them. Governance would be at best inefficient and at worst impossible.
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Heft 489, S. 13-27
ISSN: 0002-7162
World Affairs Online