Economic Clauses
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 14, Heft S1-S2, S. 99-153
ISSN: 2161-7953
21214 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 14, Heft S1-S2, S. 99-153
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: The American Journal of International Law, Band 14, Heft 1/2, S. 99
In: The American Journal of International Law, Band 14, Heft 1/2, S. 81
In: Proceedings of the annual meeting / American Society of International Law, Band 14, S. 77-78
ISSN: 2169-1118
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 13, Heft S3, S. 285-335
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 13, Heft S3, S. 277-284
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: Politica: tidsskrift for politisk videnskab, Band 20, Heft 1, S. 123
In: The spokesman: incorporating END papers and the peace register, Heft 109, S. 15-18
ISSN: 0262-7922, 1367-7748
In: Swiss Medical Forum ‒ Schweizerisches Medizin-Forum, Band 8, Heft 9
ISSN: 1424-4020
In: The Massachusetts review: MR ; a quarterly of literature, the arts and public affairs, Band 47, Heft 2, S. 278-279
ISSN: 0025-4878
In: PS: political science & politics, Band 44, Heft 4, S. 850-853
ISSN: 0030-8269, 1049-0965
In: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/uiug.30112101048160
Cover title. ; Includes index. ; "April 1984." ; Mode of access: Internet.
BASE
In: HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (3d ed.), Forthcoming
SSRN
In: Oxford Private International Law Series
This book brings clarity to the current law on asymmetric jurisdiction clauses in the EU, England, and Contracting States to the 2005 Hague Choice of Court Convention. It prompts practitioners and scholars to reflect carefully and critically on how asymmetric clauses are used and how both the clause and the law could be better designed.
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 45, Heft 1, S. 108-128
ISSN: 2161-7953
The question of including in an international multilateral instrument provisions defining the application of the instrument to the dependent territories of the contracting states has been a controversial subject in the United Nations. Such provisions, generally known as "colonial clauses," may take one of three forms. They may provide for the optional application of an instrument to the dependent territories of the contracting states, so that the instrument does not apply to the dependent territories of any contracting state unless the latter chooses to extend the application of the instrument to all or any of its dependent territories. On the other hand, they may provide for the optional exclusion from the application of the instrument of the dependent territories of the contracting states, so that the instrument applies to the dependent territories unless a contracting state chooses to exclude from the application of the instrument all or any of its dependent territories. A third type of colonial clauses may provide for the automatic application of the instrument to the dependent territories of all contracting states. However, there are instruments, notably the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations, which do not contain any reference at all with respect to their application to dependent territories. In such cases, the general rule seems to be that, subject to express or implied provisions to the contrary, the instruments apply to all the territories of the contracting states, including their dependent territories. The following is an account of the developments in connection with several multilateral instruments considered by the General Assembly of the United Nations or concluded under the auspices of the United Nations.