THE IMAGE OF NATO AND THE AMERICAN PUBLIC OPINION
In: Milletlerarası münasebetler türk yıllığı: The Turkish yearbook of international relations, S. 001-009
68875 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Milletlerarası münasebetler türk yıllığı: The Turkish yearbook of international relations, S. 001-009
In: International affairs, Band 47, Heft 2, S. 360-361
ISSN: 1468-2346
In: Diplomats and Diplomacy in the Roman World, S. 45-72
In: American Slavic and East European Review, Band 17, Heft 4, S. 481
In: Shakaigaku hyōron: Japanese sociological review, Band 9, Heft 2, S. 97-103,133
ISSN: 1884-2755
In: International journal / Canadian Institute of International Affairs, Band 10, Heft 2, S. 154-155
ISSN: 2052-465X
In: The American journal of sociology, Band 56, Heft 5, S. 507-507
ISSN: 1537-5390
In: International affairs, Band 23, Heft 1, S. 75-75
ISSN: 1468-2346
In: The political quarterly, Band 10, Heft 3, S. 428-441
ISSN: 1467-923X
In: The political quarterly: PQ, Band 10, S. 428-441
ISSN: 0032-3179
In: The political quarterly, Band 5, Heft 3, S. 413-421
ISSN: 1467-923X
In: The political quarterly, Band 3, Heft 1, S. 117-124
ISSN: 1467-923X
In: Stanford University publications. University ser. History, economics, and political science 4,2
In: Political research quarterly: PRQ ; official journal of the Western Political Science Association and other associations, Band 63, Heft 4, S. 834-849
ISSN: 1938-274X
In this study, the authors test for the presence of bias during Fox News and CNN's coverage of the 2004 national party conventions. The content analysis demonstrates that Fox News's coverage was more favorable to the Republican Party than it was to the Democratic Party, while CNN's coverage was more impartial. The authors also use panel data from the National Annenberg Election Survey to show how opinion change toward the 2004 presidential candidates was associated with exposure to cable television coverage of the national party conventions. These findings highlight the evolving role of the cable news media in presidential campaigns and elections.
In: Urban affairs review, Band 57, Heft 1, S. 70-103
ISSN: 1552-8332
Cities face numerous environmental challenges. Local governments need the public's support to tackle these problems, and scholars and practitioners have suggested that framing initiatives around resilience, as opposed to sustainability, reducing vulnerability, or adaptation, may increase public support for local action. Resilience, they argue, has a better social connotation, is more positive, and less polarizing than related concepts. Empirical evidence supporting these claims is lacking. In three online survey experiments, we test whether the public is more likely to support policies when they are framed in terms of "resilience." We also examine public conceptualizations of these different terms and whether resilience has a more positive connotation. We find significant differences in policy support, perceived importance, and interpretations of the concepts. The study confirms that framing affects policy support, but complicates claims that resilience is inherently more appealing. These findings have implications for urban research and policymaking.