Suchergebnisse

Corbett reviews 'Ethnics and Political Practice: Perspectives on Legislative Ethics' edited by Noel Preston and Charles Sampford.

This academic paper aims to analyze "Political ethics" is the main problem that has manifested itself in the form of good or politically inappropriate conduct, because it is considered very important to the development of Thailand especially the quality characteristics of politicians affecting economic and social development in local communities. As a result, business people can enter into more political roles and lead to problems in relying on political office for family and family business. This is because the administration of the country, must adhere to the principles of public interest rather than personal interests Therefore, if a politician lacks morality and political ethics. Often creates conflicts of interest in various forms, such as the unfairness of business groups that are not aligned with the government. Policy-making may favor government funding groups as well, and make the issuance of various policies beneficial to their own groups Therefore, it is a factor that does not receive thorough justice.

In this volume, Marks offers a defense of amorality as both philosophically justified and practicably livable. In so doing, the book marks a radical departure from both the new atheism and the mainstream of modern ethical philosophy. While in synch with their underlying aim of grounding human existence in a naturalistic metaphysics, the book takes both to task for maintaining a complacent embrace of morality. Marks advocates wiping the slate clean of outdated connotations by replacing the language of morality with a language of desire. The book begins with an analysis of what morality is and th.

Emphasis is on US covert action; 5 articles. Includes discussion of Indian intervention in South Asia.

Scrutinizing the practice of legislators and politicians from an ethical perspective, this work looks closely at various methods to facilitate ethical conduct.

Understanding a primitive society -- Nature and convention -- Human nature -- Man and society in Hobbes and Rousseau -- Wittgenstein's treatment of the will -- Trying -- The universalizability of moral judgments -- Moral integrity -- Can a good man be harmed? -- Ethical reward and punishment -- Index.

Preface ; 1. Introductory Remarks: We Never Do Just One Thing -- Part I: The Doctrine of Double Effect. 2. Definitions First: Classic Formulations of the Doctrine ; 3. Back to the Beginning: Aristotle, Aquinas and the Origins of Double Effect -- Part II: Double Effect in Theory. 4. The Trolley Problem ; 5. An Experimental Approach to the Permissibility of Killing One to Save Five ; 6. A Theoretical Problem with Double Effect: Closeness ; 7. Kamm, Kant, and Double Effect -- Part III: Double Effect in Practice. 8. The Classic Application of Double Effect: Collateral Damages ; 9. An Experimental Approach to the Distinction between Intending and Merely Foreseeing ; 10. Bioethical Applications: The Example of Embryo Loss and Stem Cell Research ; 11. What Shall I Do? The Doctrine Cannot Tell Us How We May Permissibly Act ;12. Concluding Remarks: Responsibility, Character and Mends -- Notes ; Bibliography ; Index.

The first issue ofEthics & International Affairswas published in 1987, when the Cold War still dominated international affairs. It was appropriate at that time to launch the journal with an issue devoted in part to the theme "superpower ethics." In his introduction to the topic Nye argues that the challenge of establishing an ethics for the United States and the Soviet Union is not met by any traditional Western system. Aristotle's "virtue," Kant's "good intent," and the "good result" of the consequentialists are inadequate to the task of determining right on the superpower playing field. In reference to this insufficiency, Nye sketches the arguments of the subsequent articles by Mazrui, Hassner, and Hoffman, each of whom offers an instructive picture of the state of superpower ethics.

In this volume, Marks offers a defense of amorality as both philosophically justified and practicably livable. In so doing, the book marks a radical departure from both the new atheism and the mainstream of modern ethical philosophy. While in synch with their underlying aim of grounding human existence in a naturalistic metaphysics, the book takes both to task for maintaining a complacent embrace of morality. Marks advocates wiping the slate clean of outdated connotations by replacing the language of morality with a language of desire.The book begins with an analysis of what morality is and th