Post-War Development of International Courts
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 37, Heft 2, S. 276-281
ISSN: 2161-7953
7031634 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 37, Heft 2, S. 276-281
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 25, Heft S1, S. 49-61
ISSN: 2161-7953
SSRN
In: International human rights law review, Band 3, Heft 1, S. 122-145
ISSN: 2213-1035
Between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2013 the Chambers of the International Criminal Court (icc) delivered several notable judgments and decisions. This comment highlights the most important developments in 2013 concerning pre-trial proceedings, trial proceedings, appeal proceedings, complementarity principle and other developments.
In: The international & comparative law quarterly: ICLQ, Band 13, Heft 2, S. 665-666
ISSN: 1471-6895
In: International Journal, Band 7, Heft 2, S. 165
In: 12 Chicago-Kent Journal of International and Comparative Law 1 (2012)
SSRN
In: GRUR international: Journal of European and International IP Law
ISSN: 2632-8550
Abstract
In GRUR International 2024, pp. 191-197, Nicolas Binctin (Professor in Poitiers, France) and Craig A. Nard (Professor in Cleveland, USA) come to the surprising conclusion that the conditions for the entry into force of the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court (UPCA), as set out in its Art. 89(1), are still not met. If their opinion were correct, not only would a new ratification by the contracting member states (including referenda in Denmark and Ireland) be necessary (this is what the authors advocate), the Unified Patent Court (as it is properly called) would be up in the air, along with its decisions and orders to date.
In short, the authors assume that effective ratification by the United Kingdom is still required for the application of Art. 89(1) UPCA as long as the said provision has not been amended removing its alleged reference to a ratification by the United Kingdom. They derive this view essentially from the wording of Art. 7(2) UPCA (according to which a division of the central division is located in London) and from Art. 3(1) of the Protocol on the Provisional Application of the UPCA (referring to a ratification of the UPCA by the United Kingdom as a precondition for the entry into force of the Protocol).
Do states or individuals stand under duties of international justice to people who live elsewhere and to other states? How are we to assess the legitimacy of international institutions such as the International Monetary Fund and the United Nations Security Council? Should we support reforms of international institutions and how should we go about assessing alternative proposals of such reforms? The book brings together leading scholars of public international law, jurisprudence and international relations, political philosophers and political theorists to explore the central notions of international legitimacy and global justice. The essays examine how these notions are related and how understanding the relationships will help us comparatively assess the validity of proposals for the reform of international institutions and public international law
SSRN
Working paper
In: Developments in International Law
In: Developments in International Law Ser. v.67