Suchergebnisse
Filter
39 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
(Not) Talking about Capital Punishment in the Xi Jinping Era
In: International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, Band 11, Heft 3, S. 79-91
ISSN: 2202-8005
In this paper, we investigate the death penalty in the People's Republic of China in the Xi Jinping era (2012–). Unlike previous administrations, Xi does not appear to have articulated a signature death penalty policy. Where policy in China is unclear, assessing both the quality and frequency of discourse on the topic can provide evidence regarding an administration's priorities. Therefore, we analyse death penalty discourse during Xi's tenure and compare it with discourse under his predecessors. We base our analysis on three large datasets assembled for this project—the collected works of China's leaders, a complete corpus of The People's Daily and a database of academic publications in China. We find no references to the death penalty in Xi Jinping's speeches. We also find a decline in The People's Daily coverage of the death penalty beginning in 2015 and a sharp decrease in academic publications on capital punishment beginning in 2011. Our findings indicate that discourse on the death penalty has declined in the Xi era. We argue that the death penalty has been demobilised under Xi as a discursive site of political signalling. Finally, we conclude with some observations about discursive silence.
Death Penalty Politics: The Fragility of Abolition in Asia and the Pacific
In: International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, Band 11, Heft 3
ISSN: 2202-8005
This special collection of articles on the death penalty and the politics of abolition in Asia and the Pacific is published to coincide with the centenary of one of the world's earliest statutory abolitions, in the Australian state of Queensland, in August 1922. Scholars of the death penalty, its practice and its abolition were invited to participate in a symposium in May 2021 hosted in Melbourne by Eleos Justice at Monash University and the Griffith Centre for Social and Cultural Research at Griffith University. They were joined by lawyers and abolition advocates, including some who had worked on death row cases.
This collection seek to bring perspectives from a variety of disciplines and methods—historical, legal, sociological, comparative—to bear on the questions of retention and abolition in a variety of jurisdictions and time periods. If there is one conclusion to these collective studies, it is the fragility of abolition. Abolition may now be widely embraced as a norm of international human rights law, but its establishment as a comprehensive and irrevocable fact remains elusive. The task of a research collection such as this is to understand why that may be as a guide to what might be pursued in the future regarding abolition.
Criminal Justice Reform in the Xi Jinping Era
In: China law and society review, Band 2, Heft 1, S. 63-128
ISSN: 2542-7466
This paper reviews current criminal justice reforms that have been initiated in recent years under the governance platform Governing the Nation in Accordance with the Law [yifa zhiguo].
1
These initiatives are helping to reframe criminal justice processes to correspond with the broad governance intentions of President Xi Jinping: finessing center-local power relations, making the authorities in the justice system more accountable for their decision-making, and improving procedures that aim to bring about greater fairness and efficiency. We examine these ongoing reforms in two main areas: the handling of minor crimes and the punishment of serious offenses. We find that yifa zhiguo and the reforms made in its name continue to reflect a highly legalist and instrumentalist vision of law whose goal is to enhance Party-state governance to control dissent and crime more effectively through criminal law, to enhance politico-legal institutional credibility, and, ultimately, to sustain Party supremacy and social stability.
Handling COVID-19 with big data in China: increasing 'governance capacity' or 'function creep'?
In: Australian journal of international affairs: journal of the Australian Institute of International Affairs, Band 75, Heft 5, S. 480-486
ISSN: 1465-332X
Legal reforms and deprivation of liberty in contemporary China
In: The rule of law in China and comparative perspectives
Deprivation of liberty under scrutiny / Elisa Nesossi, Sarah Biddulph, Flora Sapio and Susan Trevaskes -- What to make of the abolition of re-education through labour? / Sarah Biddulph -- China's socialization of administrative offenders in the community : an unrealistic agenda? / Enshen Li -- Deprivation of liberty against one's will in mental health institutions in contemporary China / Zhiyuan Guo -- Residential surveillance : evolution of a janus-faced measure / Joshua Rosenzweig -- China's pre-trial detention centres : challenges and opportunities for reform / Lei Cheng and Elisa Nesossi -- Addressing the "hide and seek" scandal: restoring the legitimacy of Kanshousuo / Nicola Macbean -- Framing imprisonment studies in China : ideology, law and politics / Elisa Nesossi and Susan Trevaskes -- Western analyses of deprivation of liberty in China / Flora Sapio -- Opportunities and challenges for legislative and institutional reform of detention in China / Elisa Nesossi, Sarah Biddulph, Flora Sapio and Susan Trevaskes
Interpreting the Rule of Law in China
With its ample resonance both within China and internationally, the 'rule of law' (yifa zhiguo) is an expression that can justify the most disparate justice reforms. It is both a political value worth defending and a reason for consternation; it is an ideal that is inherently troubling and troubled by its interlocutors, advocates, and critics. For this reason, even the term 'yifa zhiguo' has been translated differently by different interlocutors, with 'rule of law', 'rule by law' and 'ruling the country according to the law' being the most frequent renderings in the English language.
BASE
Detention and Its Reforms in the prc
In: China law and society review, Band 2, Heft 1, S. 1-62
ISSN: 2542-7466
This article reviews forms of detention and their reforms in the People's Republic of China (prc). We examine the changing scope and uses of both administrative and criminal detention powers in the reform period and the impact of changing politics, ideology, and law in reform of both detention powers and institutions.In Part 1, we focus on the continuities and discontinuities in the ideology of punishment, the perceived role and uses of detention in shaping society and in social control. In Part 2, we explore the factors relevant to the reform or abolition of range of administrative detention powers. We seek to understand how reforms have occurred, where they have stalled and where they are now possible. We ask how relevant these considerations are to the reform of criminal detention powers and find some distinctive features, not least of which is the comparative rigidity brought about by legal codification. We also note that reform to some administrative detention powers has been accompanied by an expansion in the criminal justice system. Our analysis illustrates that not only is there a wide range of people that the Party-state considers deserve to be placed outside of society, but also that in contemporary China detention is still considered to be a very useful form of social management and control.