Suchergebnisse

"This book revisits the arguments by which Harvey Sacks and Harold Garfinkel opposed the widespread attempt in the social sciences to construct disciplinary theories and methods in place of common-sense knowledge of human action, and proposed instead an alternative that would investigate the organised methods of natural language use and common-sense reasoning that constitute social orders - arguments that led to the establishment and proliferation of ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. As the very 'constructive analysis' that they opposed has begun to be incorporated into influential lines of research in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis, the authors return to the founding insights of the field and reiterate the importance of Garfinkel and Sacks' original and controversial proposals for an 'alternate' sociology of practical action and practical reasoning. Showing how constructive analysis has become entrenched in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis and arguing for a need to 're-boot' these approaches, this volume constitutes a call for a renewal of the radical alternative proposed by Garfinkel and Sacks"--

-

"This book revisits the arguments by which Harvey Sacks and Harold Garfinkel opposed the widespread attempt in the social sciences to construct disciplinary theories and methods in place of common-sense knowledge of human action, and proposed instead an alternative that would investigate the organised methods of natural language use and common-sense reasoning that constitute social orders - arguments that led to the establishment and proliferation of ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. As the very 'constructive analysis' that they opposed has begun to be incorporated into influential lines of research in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis, the authors return to the founding insights of the field and reiterate the importance of Garfinkel and Sacks' original and controversial proposals for an 'alternate' sociology of practical action and practical reasoning. Showing how constructive analysis has become entrenched in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis and arguing for a need to 're-boot' these approaches, this volume constitutes a call for a renewal of the radical alternative proposed by Garfinkel and Sacks"--

Discussing Conversation Analysis: The work of Emanuel A. Schegloff presents an in-depth view on Schegloff's complex and stimulating work in Conversation Analysis (CA) and offers clear insights into how it has and may be developed further as a research tool in social psychology, social science, artificial intelligence, and linguistics. What is the status of fine-grained empirical studies of human interaction in CA and how does CA relate to other approaches to linguistic interaction? What is Schegloff's contribution to CA and how does his work relate to that of Goffman, Garfinkel, and Sacks? How

Conversation analysis: categories, contexts, and reality -- Structures of talk-in-interaction -- Accounting for conversations -- Topic as a resource for coherence -- It says here...techniques of textual absorption and resistance -- Getting started: writing and erasing youth's stories -- Relationship in an interview -- Child protection and entries into care -- Stories of coming into care -- Social workers and children and youth in care -- Conclusion: seeing "the social" in social work

Cover -- Half Title -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Table of Contents -- List of contributors -- Acknowledgements -- Chapter 1 Ethnomethodological conversation analysis in motion: An introduction -- Part 1 Exploring "being a member" -- Chapter 2 How to study interactional history in non-human animals? Challenges and opportunities -- Chapter 3 Transcribing human-robot interaction: Methodological implications of participating machines -- Chapter 4 Ocularcentric participation frameworks: Dealing with a blind member's perspective -- Part 2 Broadening the analyst's access to a member's perspective by using various video materials -- Chapter 5 Collecting and analysing multi-source video data: Grasping the opacity of smartphone use in face-to-face encounters -- Chapter 6 From distributed ecologies to distributed bodies in interaction: Capturing and analysing "dual embodiment" in virtual environments -- Chapter 7 360-cameras used by a team participating in a mobile gathering -- Part 3 Augmenting analyses of the member's perspective with multiple research materials and methods -- Chapter 8 Inductive approach in EMCA: The role of accumulated ethnographic knowledge and video-based observations in studying military crisis management training -- Chapter 9 A satellite view of spatial points in conversation -- Chapter 10 EMCA informed experimentation as a way of investigating (also) "non-accountable" interactional phenomena -- Part 4 Enhancing transparency of analytical processes -- Chapter 11 Beyond Video: Using practice-based VolCap analysis to understand analytical practices volumetrically -- Chapter 12 Recurrent problems and recent experiments in transcribing video: Live transcribing in data sessions and depicting perspective -- Index.

In diesem Aufsatz diskutiere ich ein neues Buch von Robin WOOFFITT, in dem Konversationsanalyse (KA) mit anderen Verfahren zur Untersuchung von Diskursen verglichen wird. Dabei verwendet WOOFFITT einen sehr spezifischen Begriff der Diskursanalyse in der Tradition prominenter britischer Ansätze in der (Sozial-) Psychologie; zwei weitere Traditionslinien – die Kritische Diskursanalyse und die FOUCAULTsche Diskursanalyse – werden später zusätzlich behandelt. Meine Hauptkritik an "Conversation Analysis and Discourse Analysis" geht dahin, dass es mit einer sehr selektiven Behandlung von KA in seiner Nützlichkeit beschränkt ist auf diejenigen Ansätze, die derzeit in Großbritannien en vogue sind. In einem Epilog diskutiere ich die in dem Buch aufgerissenen zentralen Themen unter einer breiteren Perspektive.

This book presents the first collection of conversation analytic studies addressed exclusively to issues of inequality and injustice. The chapters produce a forensic analysis of how participants enact discriminatory ideologies, negotiate systemic power imbalances, and pursue social change in and through the nuances of their interactions.

What do the stories youth in state care tell about life in their family of origin? What stories do they tell us about coming into care, living in care, and relationships with foster-parents and social workers? This book presents the stories of youth in care, though not in splendid isolation, but as interactively produced, turn by turn in interviews, and in conversations with other youth. By using tools from conversation analysis (CA), the author examines interviews with youth in care and social workers, to unfold the essential and incorrigible reflexivity of story production. CA allows us to grasp the ways that a youth's story emerges turn by turn, and is an artefact of a social relation between a youth and an interviewer. This text provides social work readers with a sense of art, artistry, and ambiguity at the heart of social interaction. It will be required reading for all social work students and academics looking for a deeper, more philosophical understanding of the profession.