Congress and the "Details" of Administration
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 36, Heft 5, S. 516
ISSN: 1540-6210
93 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 36, Heft 5, S. 516
ISSN: 1540-6210
In: PS: political science & politics, Band 9, Heft 3, S. 276-279
ISSN: 1537-5935
In: American political science review, Band 69, Heft 4, S. 1443-1444
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 35, S. 717
ISSN: 1540-6210
In: Cahiers africains d'administration publique: revue semestrielle = African administrative studies = Dirāsāt ifrīqīya fi-'l-idāra, S. 197-208
ISSN: 0007-9588
In: Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science, Band 32, Heft 1, S. 51
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 33, Heft 2, S. 146
ISSN: 1540-6210
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 33, S. 146-156
ISSN: 0033-3352
In: Politische Planungssysteme, S. 142-166
In: State Government: journal of state affairs, Band 45, S. 12-18
ISSN: 0039-0097
In: The Bureaucrat, Band 1, S. 116-160
ISSN: 0045-3544
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 394, Heft 1, S. 57-71
ISSN: 1552-3349
During the 1960's, program innovation and social analysis bloomed concurrently. Especially during the mid-years of that decade, many new social enterprises were spurred by the confident analyses of social scientists. The 1970's, however, have ushered in a period of program evaluation and public retrospection. The emphasis no longer is on building a record of program initiatives or on projecting the cost-effectiveness of prospective federal policies, but on looking backward to measure what has been accomplished by means of the activities already undertaken. The difference between analysis and evaluation is tied to the policy-making context within which social science operates. The uses of analysis are most in demand when underutilized slack resources are available, when there is a great deal of confidence in the efficacy of public action, and when policy-makers want to forge new program initiatives. When these conditions change, the dominant tone of both social science and public policy shifts to evaluation. The drainage of resources, confidence, and the will to innovate thus account for the recent rise of evaluation.
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 394, S. 57-71
ISSN: 0002-7162
During the 1960's, program innovation & soc analysis bloomed concurrently. Esp during the mid-yrs of that decade, many new soc enterprises were spurred by the confident analyses of soc sci'ts. The 1970's, however, have ushered in a, period of program evaluation & public retrospection. The emphasis no longer is on building a record of program initiatives or on projecting the cost-effectiveness of prospective federal policies, but on looking backward to measure what has been accomplished by means of the activities already undertaken. The diff between analysis & evaluation is tied to the policy-making context within which soc sci operates. The uses of analysis are most in demand when underutilized slack resources are available, when there is a great deal of confidence in the efficacy of public action & when policy-makers want to forge new program initiatives. When these conditions change, the dominant tone of both soc sci & public policy shifts to evaluation. The drainage of resources, confidence, & the will to innovate thus account for the recent rise of evaluation. HA.
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 29, Heft 4, S. 431
ISSN: 1540-6210
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 29, Heft 2, S. 137
ISSN: 1540-6210