Suchergebnisse

O parecer analisa o termo inicial da prescrição administrativa da pretensão de recomposição de prazo de outorga de geração de energia elétrica, previsto na esfera administrativa pela Resolução Normativa ANNEL n. 680, de 15/09/2015, e na esfera legislativa pelo art. 4º da Lei 13.203, de 08/12/2015, substituído pelo art. 19 da Lei n. 13.360, de 17/11/2016. No direito administrativo, o prazo prescricional é de 05 (cinco) anos, previsto no art. 1º do Decreto 20.910/1932, ausente outro prazo específico em lei. A contagem do prazo prescricional para o exercício da pretensão administrativa de recomposição de prazo de outorga de geração de energia elétrica de operação que se iniciou antes da vigência da Lei n. 13.203, de 08/12/2015, inicia-se da sua data de entrada em vigor, quando não aplicável a Resolução Normativa n. 680, de 15/09/2015. ; The legal opinion aims to analyze the initial term of the administrative prescription of the claim to recompose the term of the power generation concession, provided in the ANNEL Normative Resolution n. 680, of 15/09/2015, and in the art. 4 of the Law n. 13.203, of 12/08/2015, substituted by art. 19 of Law n. 13.360, of 11/17/2016. In administrative law, the prescription is 05 (five) years, provided for in art. 1 of Decree 20.910, of 1932, absent another specific term in law. A counting of the administrative prescription of the claim to recompose the term of the power generation concession from operation that begins before Law n. 13.203, of 08/12/2015, starts from its date of entry into force, when no apliqued Normative Resolution n. 680, of 15/09/2015.

This study examines the adoption of arbitration for the definitive solution of conflicts between Brazilian Public Administration and its citizens. Despite strong sociological reasons against adopting the institute in Brazil, surprisingly, legal scholars assimilated it with ease. Dogmatic reasons, however, prevent its adoption. The thesis that it is possible when it comes to the secondary interest is untenable, as the secondary interest is only valid when it coincides with the primary one. The unavailability of the public interest was circumvented by explicit legislative authorization term. It is impossible to circumvent the supremacy of the public interest over the private one, which prevents removing the judiciary from having the final word prerogative on the interpretation of matters of the public interest. Therefore, all laws that authorize administrative arbitration are unconstitutional. ; Este estudio trata sobre la adopción del arbitraje para la solución definitiva de los conflictos entre la Administración Pública brasileña y la administrada. A pesar de las fuertes razones sociológicas en contra de la adopción del instituto en Brasil, sorprendentemente la comunidad jurídica lo asimiló con facilidad. Sin embargo, razones dogmáticas impiden su adopción. La tesis de que es posible cuando se trata de interés secundario es insostenible, ya que el interés secundario solo es válido cuando coincide con el primario. La indisponibilidad del interés público se eludió mediante autorización legislativa expresa. Es imposible eludir la supremacía del interés público sobre el privado, lo que impide que el poder judicial tenga la prerrogativa de dar la última palabra en la interpretación de los asuntos relacionados con el interés público que deben descartarse. Por lo tanto, todas las leyes que autorizan el arbitraje administrativo son inconstitucionales. ; Este estudo versa sobre a adoção da arbitragem para solução definitiva de conflitos entre a Administração Pública brasileira e o administrado. Apesar de fortes razões ...

The purpose of this paper is to address confidentiality in electronic public procurement, since current legislation in Uruguay determines that public procurement must be guided, in a very broad rule, by the principle of transparency, considering that it is the true basis of contracting democracy, which makes it the main instrument to combat corruption. It happens that the legal system foresees exceptions, in which the information can be classified as secret, reserved and confidential, as defined by the legislation. Finally, it addresses the Electronic Opening modality to be used by the Public Administration in its contracts. ; El propósito de este artículo es abordar la confidencialidad en la contratación pública electrónica, ya que la legislación vigente en Uruguay determina que la contratación pública debe guiarse, en una regla muy amplia, por el principio de transparencia, considerando que es el verdadero sustento de la contraer la democracia, lo que la convierte en el principal instrumento para combatir la corrupción. Ocurre que el ordenamiento jurídico prevé excepciones, en las que la información se puede clasificar como secreta, reservada y confidencial, según lo define la legislación. Finalmente, aborda la modalidad de Apertura Electrónica para ser utilizada por la Administración Pública en sus contratos. ; O objetivo deste trabalho é abordar o sigilo na contratação pública eletrônica, uma vez que a legislação em vigor no Uruguai determina que a contratação pública deve ser pautada, em regra muito ampla, pelo princípio da transparência, por ser esta a verdadeira base da democracia contratual. o que o torna o principal instrumento de combate à corrupção. Ocorre que o ordenamento jurídico prevê exceções, nas quais as informações podem ser classificadas como secretas, reservadas e confidenciais, conforme definido pela legislação. Por fim, trata da modalidade Abertura Eletrônica a ser utilizada pela Administração Pública em seus contratos.

The institution of administrative mediation is a legal instrument, i.e. a meas­ure aimed at achieving the objective of amicable settlement of a case. This na­ture of mediation is highlighted by the standards of the Code of Administrative Procedure. This study explores an impact of the Code-based mediation on the effectiveness of administrative proceedings. In this context, effectiveness signi­fies the accomplishment of goals that underlay the incorporation of mediation into the Code of Administrative Procedure as pertinent to the basic principles of administrative proceedings. Those goals include: the promptness of proceedings, the principle of citizens' trust in the administrative authority and the principle of amicable dispute resolution. The article elaborates upon the following four issues: grounds for the incorporation of mediation into the Code of Administrative Pro­cedure, the essence and principles of mediation, the application extent of media­tion, conclusions on how the way mediation is governed affects the effectiveness of administrative proceedings. ; Instytucja mediacji w sprawie administracyjnej jest instrumentem prawnym, czyli środkiem służącym osiągnięciu celu, jakim jest polubowne załatwienie sprawy. Taki charakter tejże instytucji podkreślają normy kodeksu postępowania administracyjnego. Niniejsze opracowanie ukazuje wpływ regulacji mediacji w Kodeksie postępowania administracyjnego na efektywność postępowania administracyjnego. Poprzez efektywność rozumiemy realizację motywów wprowadzenia mediacji do Kodeksu postępowania administracyjnego w związku z podstawowymi zasadami postępowania administracyjnego takimi jak: szybkość postępowania, zasada zaufania obywateli do organu i zasady polubownego rozwiązywania sporów. Artykuł omawia 4 zagadnienia: uzasadnienie wprowadzenia mediacji do kodeksu postępowania administracyjnego, istota i zasady mediacji, zakres zastosowania mediacji, wnioski dotyczące wpływu sposobu regulacji instytucji mediacji na efektywność postępowania administracyjnego.

The issue of the forms of deciding an administrative case has not yet been analysed in a comprehensive manner. First of all, attention used to be paid to individual forms of deciding on an administrative case, namely: administrative decision, administrative ruling, administrative settlement and deciding an administrative case in a tacit manner. If there were collective generalizations made, they came down to administrative decision and administrative ruling, which are classified as classic administrative acts, while the recent introduction of non-typical forms of deciding an administrative case, i.e. administrative settlement and deciding an administrative case in a tacit manner, makes us re-consider the characteristics of their catalogue; in particular, it should be noted at this point that they constitute a substitute for an administrative decision, which is considered to be a classic administrative act. The evolution of the forms of deciding on an administrative case leads to the conclusion that their relationship with the administrative jurisdiction has ceased to be so obvious. ; Zagadnienie form załatwienia sprawy administracyjnej nie było dotąd analizowane w sposób kompleksowy. Przede wszystkim bowiem zwracano uwagę na poszczególne formy załatwienia sprawy administracyjnej, a mianowicie: decyzję administracyjną, postanowienie administracyjne, ugodę administracyjną i milczące załatwienie sprawy administracyjnej. Jeżeli dochodziło już do zbiorczych uogólnień, to ograniczały się one do decyzji administracyjnej i postanowienia administracyjnego, które zalicza się do klasycznych aktów administracyjnych. Tymczasem wprowadzenie ostatnio nietypowych form załatwienia sprawy administracyjnej, czyli ugody administracyjnej i milczącego załatwienia sprawy administracyjnej, zmusza do ponownej refleksji teoretycznej nad charakterystyką wyróżnionego ich katalogu. W szczególności należy podkreślić, że stanowią one substytut rozstrzygnięcia administracyjnego, za jaki uznaje się klasyczny akt administracyjny. Ewolucja form załatwienia sprawy administracyjnej prowadzi zatem do wniosku, że ich związek z jurysdykcją administracyjną przestaje być oczywisty.

The authors of the paper focused upon the general clause of social interest in the general administrative proceedings, as well as the proceedings before administrative courts and the administrative executive proceedings. Thus we got a comprehensive – although limited, considering the framework of the study – analysis of the function of this clause in the three main sets of proceedings constituting the system of administrative procedure. The paper discusses a complicated concept of social interest and its relationship to a concept of public interest. It must be emphasized that both of the terms mentioned above are used, among other things, in the regulations of the Code of Administrative Proceedings. The authors also analyze the questions regarding possibilities of a conflict between a social interest and an individual interest. ; Autorzy opracowania skupili swe rozważania na klauzuli generalnej interesu społecznego w ogólnym postępowaniu administracyjnym, postępowaniu sądowoadministracyjnym oraz postępowaniu egzekucyjnym w administracji. W ten sposób otrzymali kompleksową, aczkolwiek ograniczoną ze względu na ramy opracowania, analizę funkcji tej klauzuli w podstawowych postępowaniach systemu procedury administracyjnej. Artykuł wyjaśnia skomplikowane pojęcie interesu społecznego oraz jego stosunek do pojęcia interesu publicznego. Podkreślenia wymaga, że oba pojęcia występują choćby w przepisach kodeksu postępowania administracyjnego. Przedmiotem rozważań autorzy uczynili również kwestie dotyczące możliwości zaistnienia kolizji między interesem społecznym a interesem indywidualnym.

Pesquisas reconhecem a presença de drogas psicotrópicas nas escolas e abuso dessas substâncias entre alunos. Apontam a necessidade de melhorar a formação de professores em prevenção ao consumo de drogas. Estudos demonstram que o contexto da sala se aula e a atuação do professor são elementos determinantes para assegurar o interesse e o entusiasmo na aprendizagem. O objetivo desse trabalho foi investigar se as atuais práticas docentes são apropriadas à demanda do abuso de drogas entre estudantes. Realizou-se uma intervenção pedagógica entre professoras (23) de educação básica fundamentada no método dialético: tese, antítese e síntese. No presente estudo, o planejamento e a estruturação da intervenção tiveram como foco criar um clima que viabilizasse a motivação para aprender dos professores participantes. Os resultados mostram que a construção de um ambiente de aprendizagem estimulante está associado à motivação de quem aprende. Além disso, sugerem que as propostas inconsistentes do início da intervenção foram se redefinindo até a formulação de propostas novas e adequadas ao contexto social, evidenciando articulação de conhecimentos sobre prevenção ao uso de drogas.

Deprivation of an entity of acquired rights deriving from an administrative act is possible through the combined application of administrative provisions of substantive and procedural law. The limits of durability acquired under an administrative decision rights are the constitutional principle of the protection of acquired rights and the general principles of administrative procedure. The permanence of the right acquired by the administrative decision is not absolute. Repeal or change of the administrative decision is possible only in the mode provided in the law, since the administrative decision makes use of the presumption of regularity. The deprivation of administrative and legal powers in the area of public law takes place in the context of an assessment of the implementation of an administrative decision carried out by a state body. This assessment is possible with the use of two procedural institutions for the expiry of an administrative decision and a substantive institution for the withdrawal of rights. The body assesses whether the addressee of an administrative act has implemented the administrative decision not only in accordance with its content but also the provisions of the generally applicable law. The deprivation of a party of an acquired right is often accompanied by the need to award damages (grant compensation). The procedure and premises for claiming compensation liability have been regulated in the provisions of substantive administrative law. The principle of the effectiveness of public administration bodies is one of the basic principles of administrative law. Its application is not limited only to the creation of law, but also includes the application of law by public administration bodies. The problem of the efficiency of operations of state bodies is of particular importance not only in the area of enforceability of an administrative decision, but also its authorising function. The efficiency of operations of entities in the State structure is assessed through the prism of the implementation of a given administrative decision.

Deprivation of an entity of acquired rights deriving from an administrative act is possible through the combined application of administrative provisions of substantive and procedural law. The limits of durability acquired under an administrative decision rights are the constitutional principle of the protection of acquired rights and the general principles of administrative procedure. The permanence of the right acquired by the administrative decision is not absolute. Repeal or change of the administrative decision is possible only in the mode provided in the law, since the administrative decision makes use of the presumption of regularity. The deprivation of administrative and legal powers in the area of public law takes place in the context of an assessment of the implementation of an administrative decision carried out by a state body. This assessment is possible with the use of two procedural institutions for the expiry of an administrative decision and a substantive institution for the withdrawal of rights. The body assesses whether the addressee of an administrative act has implemented the administrative decision not only in accordance with its content but also the provisions of the generally applicable law. The deprivation of a party of an acquired right is often accompanied by the need to award damages (grant compensation). The procedure and premises for claiming compensation liability have been regulated in the provisions of substantive administrative law. The principle of the effectiveness of public administration bodies is one of the basic principles of administrative law. Its application is not limited only to the creation of law, but also includes the application of law by public administration bodies. The problem of the efficiency of operations of state bodies is of particular importance not only in the area of enforceability of an administrative decision, but also its authorising function. The efficiency of operations of entities in the State structure is assessed through the prism of the implementation of a given administrative decision.