Suchergebnisse

The problem of money laundering in the world is becoming more and more challenging, which Bosnia and Herzegovina are not spared, and there is more and more "dirty" money coming from various criminal activities and trying to "launder", ie put into legal channels. Therefore, anti-money laundering projects in Bosnia and Herzegovina are extremely important, and they have shown the first results. In this regard, in May 2017, the European Union launched a two-year twinning project "Support to the fight against money laundering", and in the meantime, our country was removed from the so-called "gray lists" of the Interstate Anti-Money Laundering Authority (FATF). It should be emphasized that the benefits for Bosnia and Herzegovina due to the removal from the FATF "gray list" are multiple. Due to the fact that Bosnia and Herzegovina were placed on this "gray list", economic entities in their daily business encountered difficult foreign payment transactions. By removing our country from the Interstate Anti-Money Laundering Authority "gray list", the causes of the problems that business entities from Bosnia and Herzegovina face in their daily business, as well as the causes that our citizens encounter when performing financial transactions abroad, cease.

The authors of the paper have been studing the electoral engineering in Bosnia and Herzegovina, where the formal rules define the behavior of parties, politicians and citizens. In the first part of the hypothesis is tested whether the institutional design of Bosnia and Herzegovina contributes to the strengthening of democracy and its consolidation. We discuss the key dilemmas and challenges of the Constitution of BiH, as well as the electoral system where we've provided concrete examples of electoral engineering. In the second part of the paper the authors state the causes and consequences of electoral engineering in Bosnia and Herzegovina, where attention is given to the institutional design. The aim is to point out the necessary reforms of the electoral system, which is expected to reduce ethnic conflicts, the creation of democratic accountability, solving social problems, strengthening the will and confidence of voters, as well as increasing women's quota in institutions. At the end of the work we point out the solutions, with the intention that the work will serve and contribute the scientific knowledge of institutional design in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

309Human rights — Responsibility of States — Transfer of individuals to custody of other State — Whether transferring State responsible for subsequent treatment of individuals — Torture — Capital punishment — Whether transferring State required to seek assurances from other State prior to transfer — Circumstances in which real risk of torture or other inhuman or degrading treatment to be presumed — Transfer of individuals in Bosnia and Herzegovina to United States forces — Subsequent transfer to Guantanamo BayHuman rights — Liberty and security — Arbitrary detention — Pre-trial detention — Court ordering release — Transfer of detainees to custody of other State after order for release — Other State subsequently holding detainees — Whether engaging responsibility of transferring StateHuman rights — Fair trial — Presumption of innocence — Limits — Administrative decisions taken on basis of prosecutionStates — Federal States — Whether actions of component of federation engaging responsibility of national authorities — The law of Bosnia and Herzegovina

In the age of globalisation, the foreign funding of mosques has become widespread in many countries worldwide. Bosnia and Herzegovina is no exception to the rule, and the post-war - and still ongoing - (re)construction process there has been accompanied by many foreign donations, in line with different forms of "mosque geopolitics" depending on the donor country. As a great number of mosques were destroyed during the Bosnian war of 1992-1995, the post-war period has inevitably required a vital reconstruction process. New needs for places of worship, caused by the nationwide war-related displacement of Bosnian Muslims, have been met by the construction of new mosques. In a relatively poor country like Bosnia and Herzegovina, the influx of foreign funds has been called for and welcomed by many Bosnian Muslim congregations. Western nations have lagged behind during this (re)construction process, while the task of helping financially with mosques has been taken over by several "friendly Islamic countries," among them were most prominently Iran, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey. But such foreign funding has not been via a top-down process, and in most cases the financial help coming from foreign donors only complements locally generated revenues invested in the (re)construction, restoration, and renovation of each Bosnian mosque. While the short-term impact of this foreign funding is clear albeit not systematic architecturally, the religious one is much more modest.