Suchergebnisse

Cover -- CONTENTS -- Glossary -- SUMMARY OF MISSION OUTCOMES AND PRIORITY RECOMMENDATIONS -- DETAILED TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT AND RECOMMENDATIONS -- A. Reconciliation Processes -- B. Compilation of Nonbudgetary Public Sector Units -- C. Classification Issues -- D. Officials Met During the Mission -- FIGURES -- 1. Illustration Step-by-Step Unravelling Annual Financial Statement into Entity Components -- 2. Step [A]-Verifying Net Income -- 3. Step [B]-Estimating Net Flows -- 4. Step [C]-Determine 'Other Economic Flows' and Unravelling Provisions -- 5. Step [D]-Allocating GFS Transactions, OEFs and Stocks -- 6. Step [E]-Finalizing GFS Framework, and Calculating NLB and Financing -- TABLES -- 1. Priority Recommendations -- 2. Adjustments on Revenue and Expense per GFSM 2014 and ESA 2010 -- 3. Adjusting Provisions Recording to the GFSM 2014 and ESA 2010 Methodology -- 4. Additional Recommendations -- 5. Comparison CONCEPT 'New' GFSM 2014 Framework Data and 'Old' HRT Data -- 6. Additional Recommendations -- 7. Illustration of Health Care Funding and Provision Flows Four Subsectors of the Economy -- 8. Generic Business Accounting Standards and GFS Recording Standards Compared (Treatment of Specific Concepts in the GFSM 2014 and ESA 2010 Frameworks) -- APPENDIX -- I. Proposed Compilation Process for Extrabudgetary Units

KEY ISSUESStand-By Arrangement (SBA): The Board approved Bosnia and Herzegovina's (BiH)request for a two-year SBA with access of SDR 338.2 million (200 percent of quota) onSeptember 26, 2012. The fourth review was completed on October 28, 2013 andSDR 211.375 million (125 percent of quota) has been disbursed so far. SDR 42.275 million(25 percent of quota) would become available after completion of the fifth review.Program performance: Policy implementation remains strong despite a challengingenvironment. All end-September 2013 performance criteria (PCs) and indicative targetswere met. The fifth

By combining comparative politics, conflict analysis and international relations theory Soeren Keil offers a unique analysis of federalism in post-Dayton Bosnia and Herzegovina. By exploring this model of 'imposed federalism' not only does this study greatly contribute to the literature on developments in Bosnia and Herzegovina it also re-evaluates comparative federalism in theory and practice. This study also offers important conclusions for similar cases, both in the Western Balkans region and the wider world, where international involvement and federalism as a method of conflict resolution.

Cover Page -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Contents -- Dedication Page -- List of Maps -- List of Acronyms -- Acknowledgements -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Theories of Multinational Federalism -- 3 Bosnia and Herzegovina's Federal Tradition: Continuity, Change and Foreign Powers -- 4 The Bosnian Federation -- 5 Federalism in Post-war Bosnia and Herzegovina -- 6 Conclusion -- Bibliography

Five major groups fought one another in Bosnia and Herzegovina during the Second World War: The German and Italian occupiers, the Serbian Chetniks, the Ustasha of the Independent State of Croatia, the Bosnian Muslims, and the Tito-led Partisans. The aims, policies, and actions of each group are examined in light of their own documents and those of rival groups. This work shows how the Partisans prevailed over other groups because of their ideological appeal, superior discipline, and success in winning the support of large numbers of uncommitted Bosnians, particularly the Bosnian Muslims.

Part I. The Battle. - 1. We fired first 9. - 2. They fire back 26. - 3. The battle 44. - 4. The defeat 65. - Part II. Reflections on the Battle. - 5. Non-violent wars 85. - 6. Non-violent insurgency 122. - 7. Diplomatic counterinsurgency 150. - 8. The avalanche 171. - 9. Looking forward 198