Legal Bases
In: International review of the Red Cross: humanitarian debate, law, policy, action, Band 30, Heft S1, S. 6-6
ISSN: 1607-5889
35026 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: International review of the Red Cross: humanitarian debate, law, policy, action, Band 30, Heft S1, S. 6-6
ISSN: 1607-5889
In: The journal of communist studies, Band 9, Heft 1, S. 150-160
In: International journal of legal information: IJLI ; the official journal of the International Association of Law Libraries, Band 18, Heft 1, S. 38-38
ISSN: 2331-4117
In: Social & legal studies: an international journal, Band 15, Heft 2, S. 306-307
ISSN: 1461-7390
In: Žurnal Sibirskogo Federal'nogo Universiteta: Journal of Siberian Federal University. Gumanitarnye nauki = Humanities & social sciences, S. 2058-2078
ISSN: 2313-6014
The present article stipulates on various disputable issues of applying the general legal maxims on overcoming the conflict of lex posterior derogate priori and lex specialis derogate legi generali based on the empirical examples of contemporary Russian criminal law. The objective is to clear the peculiarities of operating the lex posterior and lex specialis maxims including, inter alia, through appealing to the doctrine and positive law in the aspect of correlation with some specific colnflict rules. For this purpose, the author turns to a number of techniques, ways and methods of legal phenomena studies, such as, particularly, system approach, ascend from abstract to specific, using the logic of standard and normative statements, conceptual and definition analysis, speculative experiment, legal and dogmatic approach, legal simulation method, law comparison method. The main conclusion of the research is formulated as follows: though the principles of lex specialis and lex posterior are generated by the legal doctrine as criteria for selecting one out of two conflicting options, the principle that a law governing a specific subject matter overrides a law governing only general matters finds a wider scope of application compared to the principle of priority of a new law over the old one. The situation is explained by the fact that lex specialis is deliberately used by the legislators to construct logical relationships of legal rules, while lex posterior does not perform a similar function
In: Uluslararasi Hukuk ve Politika, Band 7, Heft 26
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 107, Heft 2, S. 454-460
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: Uluslararasi Hukuk ve Politika, Band 7, Heft 26, S. 125-152
In: The Cambridge yearbook of European legal studies: CYELS, Band 7, S. 17-31
ISSN: 2049-7636
The creation of an economically integrated Europe, based on free circulation across open borders, has probably facilitated an increase in transnational crime. One response to this phenomenon has been to try to create an integrated European criminal law. But legal integration will not magically solve all the problems related to transnational crime. Indeed, it may create problems of its own. By favouring efficiency (that is, repression) over legitimacy (the protection of fundamental rights), it favours a criminal justice policy oriented towards 'security'. By imposing the same rules throughout Europe, it disturbs the internal consistency of national legal systems. Nevertheless, the phenomenon of legal integration, facilitated by new legal instruments such as framework decisions, continues to develop. We might therefore ask ourselves, as an introduction, why this is so.
In: The international & comparative law quarterly: ICLQ, Band 23, Heft 4, S. 881-882
ISSN: 1471-6895
In: The international & comparative law quarterly: ICLQ, Band 20, Heft 4, S. 764-765
ISSN: 1471-6895
In: Yearbook of European law, Band 31, Heft 1, S. 373-401
ISSN: 2045-0044
In: China perspectives: Shenzhou-zhanwang, Heft 3, S. 80-82
ISSN: 2070-3449, 1011-2006
World Affairs Online
In: Punishment & society, Band 5, Heft 3, S. 259-260
ISSN: 1741-3095
In: Nuclear law bulletin, S. 9-27
ISSN: 0304-341X