THE COMMON LAW AND FREE ENTERPRISE: AN EARLY CASE OF MONOPOLY
In: The economic history review, Band a7, Heft 2, S. 217-220
ISSN: 1468-0289
8 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The economic history review, Band a7, Heft 2, S. 217-220
ISSN: 1468-0289
In: University of Maine studies ser. 2, no. 43
In: The Maine bulletin vol. 40, no. 4
In: Schriften des deutschen Instituts für außenpolitische Forschung und des Hamburger Instituts für auswärtige Politik 22
In: Das Britische Reich in der Weltpolitik 7
In: Prentice Hall Political science series
In: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/njp.32101066804046
v. 4, no. 1. Carey, W.G. Simple ideas. no. 2. Carey, W.G. Business leadership. no. 3. Carey, W.G. Responsibility and progress. no. 4. Carey, W.G. America must move forward. no. 5. Carey, W.G. Our tragic dilemma. no. 6. Kemper, J.S. Youth's opportunity and responsibility. no. 7. Hawkes, A.W. In unity there is strength. no. 8. Hawkes, A.W. United Americs looks ahead to 1942. no. 9. Hawkes, A.W. Employment relations. no. 10. Hawkes, A.W. Life insurance depends on free enterprise. no. 11. Hawkes, A.W. Duty of business in war. no. 12. Hawkes, A.W. Victory and free enterprise. no. 13. Johnston, E.A. The road to realism. no. 14. Johnston, E.A. The future for the farmer. no. 15. Johnston, E.A. The adventure of tomorrow. no. 16. Johnston, E.A. Eric Johnston in New Haven -- v. 5, no. 1. Steinkraus, H.W. Your dollars and sense. no. 2. Steinkraus, H.W. The job of selling America to the Americans. no. 3. Steinkraus, H.W. A challende to leadership in business, labor, and government. no. 4. Steinkraus, H.W. Group action and its impact on the nation -- v. 6., no. 1. Steinkraus, H.W. Building a better America. no. 2. Steinkraus, H.W. Measuring monolpoly. no. 3. Steinkraus, H.W. United nation. no. 4. Steinkraus, H.W. The decisive decade. no. 5. Steinkraus, H.W. Improving Canada-United States relations. ; v. 1, no. 1. Barnes, J.H. Treatment of Allied debts. no. 2. Barnes, J.H. Industry and the agricultural revival. no. 3. Barnes, J.H. "Organization and fair play." no. 4. Barnes, J.H. Modern industry and individualism. no. 5. Barnes, J.H. "European and American ideals." no. 6. Individualism in action. no. 7. Barnes, J.H. American individualism versus European social panaceas. no. 8. Barnes, J.H. The opportunity of business leadership. no. 9. Barnes, J.H. "The American political philosophy in its economic and social aspects." no. 10. Barnes, J.H. The service of organized industry. no. 11. Barnes, J.H. America's conquest of poverty. no. 12. Barnes, J.H. Machine production and individual prosperity. no. 13. Barnes, J.H. The farm market. no. 14. Barnes, J.H. Inventive industry and resourceful government. no. 15. Barnes, J.H. Government price-fixing. no. 16. Barnes, J.H. The national significance of bank resources. no. 17. Barnes, J.H. Modern business and government at Runnymede -- v. 2, no. 1. Barnes, J.H. Annual address, 1924. no. 2. Harriman, J.I. The changing business world. no. 3. Harriman, J.I. American progress under American methods. no. 4. Harriman, J.I. Current national problems. no. 5. Harriman, J.I. Business achievements and problems during the depression. no. 6. Sibley, H. Principles of American enterprise. no. 7. Sibley, H. Business looking ahead. no. 8. Davis, G.H. What helps business. no. 9. Davis, G.H. Congress and business. no. 10. Davis, G.H. Are we getting soft. no. 11. Davis, G.H. Expanding national income and employment. no. 12. Carey W.G. Build America -- v. 3, no. 1. Harriman, H.I. The changing business world. no. 2. Harriman, H.I. The ultimate goal. no. 3. Harriman, H.I. In retrospect. no. 4. Harriman, H.I. Monetary policy. no. 5. Harriman, H.I. Business in 1934. no. 6. Harriman, H.I. Statement at the meeting of the Board of directors of the Chamber. no. 7. Harriman, H.I. Business problems of 1934. no. 8. Harriman, H.I. What makes electricity ch ; Mode of access: Internet.
BASE
The industrial development of the united States has been accompanied by attempts to restrain the free play of competition through modern trust movements. The growing concentration of industry added a new importance to the law on restraint of trade, and considerable statutory regulation of trusts were attempted. This discourse deals with the organization of business enterprises in the United states, their practices in respect to competition, and the Statutory regulations of trusts prior to 1920. It does not embrace government regulation of all industries as such, but is limited to federal regulation through statutory enactments as an outgrowth of the necessity to curb industrial activities, competition and combination.
BASE
In: The review of politics, Band 2, Heft 4, S. 415-437
ISSN: 1748-6858
In his address at the 200th convocation of the University of Chicago, June 11, 1940, President Hutchins invited American youth to reexamine the principles which make life worth living.This enterprise is most urgently necessary in removing the intellectual unpreparedness of the nation. Far worse than the military and economic deficiencies in equipment and armament are the spiritual dissensions among the various groups of our time. In the universal conflict those nations will prevail whose unity results from spontaneous and free devotion to values which are recognized as worth living and dying for. We can reintegrate the nation, when we succeed in breaking the continuous secularization which, parallel to the rapid industrialization after the Civil War, is undermining the ethos of American life. The ethos which made this commonwealth great, was the fighting spirit of enlightenment. The backbone of the political principles of the Constitution, is the spirit of the Christian Law of Nature; that means political freedom as the fullfilment of the rules of the Almighty. This unity between the three spheres: nature, man and God was discarded by the process of secularization. The ethics of enlightenment shifted to the demand for universal comfort and for good living. The attitude of a boundless optimism prevailed which considered history an unending process of perfection. It was thought that this state of continuous improvement would result from the scientific organization of social and political institutions; their progress would eliminate eventually what the less scientific past had ascribed to the finiteness and sinfulness of man.