U.S. foreign policy
In: American federationist: official monthly magazine of the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations, S. 10-11
ISSN: 0002-8428
812424 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: American federationist: official monthly magazine of the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations, S. 10-11
ISSN: 0002-8428
In: The Washington quarterly, Band 18, Heft 3, S. 195-210
ISSN: 0163-660X, 0147-1465
World Affairs Online
In: The Department of State bulletin: the official weekly record of United States Foreign Policy, Band 79, Heft 2033, S. 45-49
ISSN: 0041-7610
World Affairs Online
In: The Washington quarterly, Band 18, Heft 3, S. 193-210
ISSN: 1530-9177
In: American journal of international law, Band 87, Heft 3, S. 497-499
ISSN: 0002-9300
In: SAIS review / School of Advanced International Studies, the Johns Hopkins Foreign Policy Institute, Band 4, Heft 1, S. 107
ISSN: 0036-0775
In: American political science review, Band 99, Heft 1, S. 107-123
ISSN: 1537-5943
Research in international relations has identified a variety of actors who appear to influence U.S. foreign policy, including experts and "epistemic communities," organized interests (especially business and labor), and ordinary citizens or "public opinion." This research, however, has often focused on a single factor at a time, rather than systematically testing the relative importance of alternative possible influences. Using extensive survey data gathered over three decades we conduct a comparative test, attempting to account for the expressed foreign policy preferences of policy makers by means of the preferences of the general public and those of several distinct sets of elites. The results of cross-sectional and time-lagged analyses suggest that U.S. foreign policy is most heavily and consistently influenced by internationally oriented business leaders, followed by experts (who, however, may themselves be influenced by business). Labor appears to have significant but smaller impacts. The general public seems to have considerably less effect, except under particular conditions. These results generally hold over several different analytical models (including two-observation time series) and different clusters of issues (economic, military, and diplomatic), with some variations across different institutional settings (the U.S. House, Senate, and executive branch).
In: Monthly review: an independent socialist magazine, Band 31, Heft 11, S. 1-12
ISSN: 0027-0520
FINDINGS OF A STUDY INVESTIGATING GLOBAL BALANCE OF POWER BY THE CENTER FOR DEFENSE INFORMATION ARE PRESENTED. THEY INDICATE THAT, CONTRARY TO POPULAR BELIEF, BOTH SUPERPOWERS HAVE BEEN DECLINING IN POWER AND INFLUENCE IN THE POST-WORLD WAR II ERA. NEXT, TO PREDICT FUTURE US FOREIGN POLICY, THREE ECONOMIC ASPECTS OF US INTERESTS ARE ANALYZED: DIRECT FOREIGN INVESTMENT, BALANCE OF PAYMENTS, US BANKS.
In: Orbis: FPRI's journal of world affairs, Band 50, Heft 1, S. 103-116
ISSN: 0030-4387
In: World policy journal: WPJ ; a publication of the World Policy Institute, Band 3, Heft 2, S. 251
ISSN: 0740-2775
In: The Washington quarterly, Band 12, S. 151-197
ISSN: 0163-660X, 0147-1465
Problems of US human rights policy and opportunities for political aid abroad; 4 articles.
In: The Department of State bulletin: the official weekly record of United States Foreign Policy, Band 31, S. 359-362
ISSN: 0041-7610
In: The Department of State bulletin: the official weekly record of United States Foreign Policy, Band 79, S. 45-49
ISSN: 0041-7610
In: The Department of State bulletin: the official weekly record of United States Foreign Policy, Band 52, S. 1030-1034
ISSN: 0041-7610
In: U.S. news & world report, Band 89, S. 35-36
ISSN: 0041-5537