Suchergebnisse
Filter
309 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
SSSR i Litva v gody vtoroj mirovoj vojny, T. 2, СССР и Литва в годы второй мировой войны, Т. 2, Litva v politike SSSR i v meždunarodnych otnošenijach: (avgust 1940 - sentjabrʹ 1945 gg.)
In: SSSR i Litva v gody vtoroj mirovoj vojny T. 2
In: СССР и Литва в годы второй мировой войны Т. 2
M. K. Čiurlionio kūrybos retrospekcijos B. Kutavičiaus ir V. Bartulio muzikoje ; Retrospectives of M. K. Čiurlionis' work in music by B. Kutavičius and V. Bartulis
The aim of the study is to reveal the differences in the attitudes to Čiurlionis' creative work by the Lithuanian composers of two different generations – Bronius Kutavičius and Vidmantas Bartulis. The primacy of constructive or emotional relationship is demonstrated and the differences between modern and postmodern attitudes are studied with the help of analytical and comparative methods. However, this divide does not eliminate certain similarities. The period between the commemoration of Čiurlionis' birth centenary in 1975 and the year 2005 is examined. Kutavičius' "Dzūkiškos variacijos" (Dzukian Variations), Bartulis' "Ūkanos" (Mist), "Hommage à Čiurlionis" and "Kelias" (The Way) are analysed. The reasons for late reception are studied, and the political and cultural conditions discussed. Establishing a national musical school, the composers (just like Čiurlionis himself ) stressed folk tradition for a long time; only later did they start to purposely build links with their predecessors. It is stated how with the passing of time it is possible to distance oneself from an idealised relationship, and the approach as if it were an icon has also changed. The possibility of a more relaxed communication is linked with the changing from general relationships to personal. The artist who creates an opus that has been greatly influenced by others does not necessarily draw on the "peaks". It is possible that unresolved and unexpanded things, certain dead ends, or some collateral phenomena for which the genius simply had no time can be important for further expansion of art. Nevertheless, incorporated music is often employed as a sign and then the most characteristic works are drawn on. In cases of intertextuality, personal concurrence is rare and it imparts an additional dimension to other authors' creative idea that is being expanded. With the increasing number of works marked by in-texts, the listener is directed to search for them. In Čiurlionis' case, we have a peculiar phenomenon as honouring this symbolic Lithuanian figure other composers draw on his painting and graphic works, textual legacy, his music, or his personality. In his "Dzūkiškos variacijos" (Dzukian Variations) for chamber orchestra, piano and tape, Kutavičius not only pays homage to Čiurlionis but also as though builds a solidarity link between folk art, Čiurlionis' legacy and modern composing techniques. Meanwhile, in Bartuli's "Kelias" for mixed choir, saxophone, percussion and tape, Čiurlionis exists as an imaginary dramatic personage and thus here we can speak about stylistic biographic intertextuality
BASE
M. K. Čiurlionio kūrybos retrospekcijos B. Kutavičiaus ir V. Bartulio muzikoje ; Retrospectives of M. K. Čiurlionis' work in music by B. Kutavičius and V. Bartulis
The aim of the study is to reveal the differences in the attitudes to Čiurlionis' creative work by the Lithuanian composers of two different generations – Bronius Kutavičius and Vidmantas Bartulis. The primacy of constructive or emotional relationship is demonstrated and the differences between modern and postmodern attitudes are studied with the help of analytical and comparative methods. However, this divide does not eliminate certain similarities. The period between the commemoration of Čiurlionis' birth centenary in 1975 and the year 2005 is examined. Kutavičius' "Dzūkiškos variacijos" (Dzukian Variations), Bartulis' "Ūkanos" (Mist), "Hommage à Čiurlionis" and "Kelias" (The Way) are analysed. The reasons for late reception are studied, and the political and cultural conditions discussed. Establishing a national musical school, the composers (just like Čiurlionis himself ) stressed folk tradition for a long time; only later did they start to purposely build links with their predecessors. It is stated how with the passing of time it is possible to distance oneself from an idealised relationship, and the approach as if it were an icon has also changed. The possibility of a more relaxed communication is linked with the changing from general relationships to personal. The artist who creates an opus that has been greatly influenced by others does not necessarily draw on the "peaks". It is possible that unresolved and unexpanded things, certain dead ends, or some collateral phenomena for which the genius simply had no time can be important for further expansion of art. Nevertheless, incorporated music is often employed as a sign and then the most characteristic works are drawn on. In cases of intertextuality, personal concurrence is rare and it imparts an additional dimension to other authors' creative idea that is being expanded. With the increasing number of works marked by in-texts, the listener is directed to search for them. In Čiurlionis' case, we have a peculiar phenomenon as honouring this symbolic Lithuanian figure other composers draw on his painting and graphic works, textual legacy, his music, or his personality. In his "Dzūkiškos variacijos" (Dzukian Variations) for chamber orchestra, piano and tape, Kutavičius not only pays homage to Čiurlionis but also as though builds a solidarity link between folk art, Čiurlionis' legacy and modern composing techniques. Meanwhile, in Bartuli's "Kelias" for mixed choir, saxophone, percussion and tape, Čiurlionis exists as an imaginary dramatic personage and thus here we can speak about stylistic biographic intertextuality
BASE
Tarybu̜ lietuvos visuomenės mokslai: RL ; referatyvinis leidinys. Ėkonomika = Ekonomika
ISSN: 0206-3182
Lietuvių genties ginkluotė V-XIII a. ; Lithuanian weaponry in the 5th – 13th century
The Baltic society underwent different stages of development just as any other culture. Throughout centuries weaponry and its progress stages were among the major factors facilitating community's adaptation to altering environment. The Baltic tribes which once inhabited the territory of the modern Lithuania had to develop their weaponry in order to promote their own existence and to defend their habitat from the attacks of foreign foes during the course of time; therefore, they gradually developed traditional munitions outfits distinctive with their own specific features and revealing shared similarities when compared. This paper seeks to review the 5th – early 13th century weaponry of the Lithuanian tribe which inhabited the habitat of the Eastern Lithuanian Barrow Culture (hereinafter referred to as the ELBC) based on the materials of the burial monuments. The tasks of the paper are: 1. Describing the social structure and economical and political development of the Lithuanian tribe (ELBC) in the 5th – early 13th century identifying its most characteristic features; 2. Assessing types of weaponry used by the 5th – early 13th century Lithuanian tribe (ELBC) and identifying what kind of weapons (which of their types) were typical for a warrior of this tribe during the Middle and Late Iron Age period; 3. Highlighting specifics of the munitions of the 5th – early 13th century warriors of the Lithuanian tribe (ELBC) compared to other Baltic tribes and identifying typical munitions outfits of the warriors of this tribe.
BASE
Lietuvių genties ginkluotė V-XIII a. ; Lithuanian weaponry in the 5th – 13th century
The Baltic society underwent different stages of development just as any other culture. Throughout centuries weaponry and its progress stages were among the major factors facilitating community's adaptation to altering environment. The Baltic tribes which once inhabited the territory of the modern Lithuania had to develop their weaponry in order to promote their own existence and to defend their habitat from the attacks of foreign foes during the course of time; therefore, they gradually developed traditional munitions outfits distinctive with their own specific features and revealing shared similarities when compared. This paper seeks to review the 5th – early 13th century weaponry of the Lithuanian tribe which inhabited the habitat of the Eastern Lithuanian Barrow Culture (hereinafter referred to as the ELBC) based on the materials of the burial monuments. The tasks of the paper are: 1. Describing the social structure and economical and political development of the Lithuanian tribe (ELBC) in the 5th – early 13th century identifying its most characteristic features; 2. Assessing types of weaponry used by the 5th – early 13th century Lithuanian tribe (ELBC) and identifying what kind of weapons (which of their types) were typical for a warrior of this tribe during the Middle and Late Iron Age period; 3. Highlighting specifics of the munitions of the 5th – early 13th century warriors of the Lithuanian tribe (ELBC) compared to other Baltic tribes and identifying typical munitions outfits of the warriors of this tribe.
BASE
Matematičeskie metody v social'nych naukach: trudy seminara = Matematiniai metodai socialiniuose moksluose = Mathematical methods in social sciences
ISSN: 0136-3700
В. И. Самойло в русской периодике и культурной жизни Вильно (1920–1939) ; V. I. Samojlo Vilniaus rusų periodikoje ir kultūriniame gyvenime (1920–1939) ; V. I. Samoilo in Russian periodicals and cultural life of Wilno (1920–1939)
A native of Belarus, publicist, critic and author of poetic texts Vladimir Samoilo (1878–1941) is well known as a teacher of Yanka Kupala and a popularizer of his poetry. He is also known as a correspondent of Alexander Blok and an author of works about his creations, as well as a prominent figure of the Belarusian national movement. However, his participation in the Russian periodical press and in the social and cultural life in Wilno is insufficiently investigated. The aim of this study is to fill this gap. Samoilo was the organizer of the evenings of the famous Russian writers Dmitry Merezhkovsky, Zinaida Gippius, Dmitry Filosofov in 1920. He participated in discussions about the works of the Russian philosopher Nikolai Berdyaev, organized by the Literary-artistic section of the Wilno Russian society in 1925. He was elected a member of the council of the Religious-philosophical section of the Wilno Russian society in 1927. Later, Samoilo became vice-chairman of the Religious-philosophical section. Samoilo was the author of a large statement at the solemn assembly on the 50th anniversary of the death of Fyodor Dostoevsky in 1931. At the meetings of the Religious-philosophical circle, Samoilo made reports on Russian philosophers Ivan Kireevsky, Pyotr Chaadayev and others. Newspapers "Vilenskoe slovo", "Vilenskaya misl", "Utro" published Samoilo's articles on the topics of domestic and international politics as well as economy. He was the editor and publisher of the newspaper "Vilenskaya rech", where he published articles about the works of Alexander Blok and Fyodor Dostoevsky as well about the historiosophic concept of Marian Zdziechowski. He had conflicts with the newspaper "Vilenskoe utro". Samoilo's cooperation in the newspaper "Nashe vremia" was accompanied by a polemic with the Warsaw newspaper "Za svobodu!" and its head Dmitry Filosofov about Alexander Blok's poem "The Twelve". The most important Samoilo's publications in the "Nashe vremia" newspaper are devoted to the history of Russian literature and philosophy, as well to discussions in the Religious and philosophical circle of the Wilno Russian society. The analysis of the collected information clarifies the existing knowledge about the activities and views of Samoilo in the Wilno period and complements the general picture of the life of the Russian minority in the Wilno region and in the interwar Poland as a whole. Despite the contradictions and conflicts with certain representatives of the Russian society in Wilno, Vladimir Samoilo was its active and influential participant.
BASE
В. И. Самойло в русской периодике и культурной жизни Вильно (1920–1939) ; V. I. Samojlo Vilniaus rusų periodikoje ir kultūriniame gyvenime (1920–1939) ; V. I. Samoilo in Russian periodicals and cultural life of Wilno (1920–1939)
A native of Belarus, publicist, critic and author of poetic texts Vladimir Samoilo (1878–1941) is well known as a teacher of Yanka Kupala and a popularizer of his poetry. He is also known as a correspondent of Alexander Blok and an author of works about his creations, as well as a prominent figure of the Belarusian national movement. However, his participation in the Russian periodical press and in the social and cultural life in Wilno is insufficiently investigated. The aim of this study is to fill this gap. Samoilo was the organizer of the evenings of the famous Russian writers Dmitry Merezhkovsky, Zinaida Gippius, Dmitry Filosofov in 1920. He participated in discussions about the works of the Russian philosopher Nikolai Berdyaev, organized by the Literary-artistic section of the Wilno Russian society in 1925. He was elected a member of the council of the Religious-philosophical section of the Wilno Russian society in 1927. Later, Samoilo became vice-chairman of the Religious-philosophical section. Samoilo was the author of a large statement at the solemn assembly on the 50th anniversary of the death of Fyodor Dostoevsky in 1931. At the meetings of the Religious-philosophical circle, Samoilo made reports on Russian philosophers Ivan Kireevsky, Pyotr Chaadayev and others. Newspapers "Vilenskoe slovo", "Vilenskaya misl", "Utro" published Samoilo's articles on the topics of domestic and international politics as well as economy. He was the editor and publisher of the newspaper "Vilenskaya rech", where he published articles about the works of Alexander Blok and Fyodor Dostoevsky as well about the historiosophic concept of Marian Zdziechowski. He had conflicts with the newspaper "Vilenskoe utro". Samoilo's cooperation in the newspaper "Nashe vremia" was accompanied by a polemic with the Warsaw newspaper "Za svobodu!" and its head Dmitry Filosofov about Alexander Blok's poem "The Twelve". The most important Samoilo's publications in the "Nashe vremia" newspaper are devoted to the history of Russian literature and philosophy, as well to discussions in the Religious and philosophical circle of the Wilno Russian society. The analysis of the collected information clarifies the existing knowledge about the activities and views of Samoilo in the Wilno period and complements the general picture of the life of the Russian minority in the Wilno region and in the interwar Poland as a whole. Despite the contradictions and conflicts with certain representatives of the Russian society in Wilno, Vladimir Samoilo was its active and influential participant.
BASE
В. И. Самойло в русской периодике и культурной жизни Вильно (1920–1939) ; V. I. Samojlo Vilniaus rusų periodikoje ir kultūriniame gyvenime (1920–1939) ; V. I. Samoilo in Russian periodicals and cultural life of Wilno (1920–1939)
A native of Belarus, publicist, critic and author of poetic texts Vladimir Samoilo (1878–1941) is well known as a teacher of Yanka Kupala and a popularizer of his poetry. He is also known as a correspondent of Alexander Blok and an author of works about his creations, as well as a prominent figure of the Belarusian national movement. However, his participation in the Russian periodical press and in the social and cultural life in Wilno is insufficiently investigated. The aim of this study is to fill this gap. Samoilo was the organizer of the evenings of the famous Russian writers Dmitry Merezhkovsky, Zinaida Gippius, Dmitry Filosofov in 1920. He participated in discussions about the works of the Russian philosopher Nikolai Berdyaev, organized by the Literary-artistic section of the Wilno Russian society in 1925. He was elected a member of the council of the Religious-philosophical section of the Wilno Russian society in 1927. Later, Samoilo became vice-chairman of the Religious-philosophical section. Samoilo was the author of a large statement at the solemn assembly on the 50th anniversary of the death of Fyodor Dostoevsky in 1931. At the meetings of the Religious-philosophical circle, Samoilo made reports on Russian philosophers Ivan Kireevsky, Pyotr Chaadayev and others. Newspapers "Vilenskoe slovo", "Vilenskaya misl", "Utro" published Samoilo's articles on the topics of domestic and international politics as well as economy. He was the editor and publisher of the newspaper "Vilenskaya rech", where he published articles about the works of Alexander Blok and Fyodor Dostoevsky as well about the historiosophic concept of Marian Zdziechowski. He had conflicts with the newspaper "Vilenskoe utro". Samoilo's cooperation in the newspaper "Nashe vremia" was accompanied by a polemic with the Warsaw newspaper "Za svobodu!" and its head Dmitry Filosofov about Alexander Blok's poem "The Twelve". The most important Samoilo's publications in the "Nashe vremia" newspaper are devoted to the history of Russian literature and philosophy, as well to discussions in the Religious and philosophical circle of the Wilno Russian society. The analysis of the collected information clarifies the existing knowledge about the activities and views of Samoilo in the Wilno period and complements the general picture of the life of the Russian minority in the Wilno region and in the interwar Poland as a whole. Despite the contradictions and conflicts with certain representatives of the Russian society in Wilno, Vladimir Samoilo was its active and influential participant.
BASE