Securitization of Islam and religious discrimination: Religious minorities in Western democracies, 1990–2008
In: Comparative European politics, Band 13, Heft 2, S. 175-197
ISSN: 1740-388X
8 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Comparative European politics, Band 13, Heft 2, S. 175-197
ISSN: 1740-388X
In: Foreign Policy Analysis, Band 10, Heft 4, S. 413-430
In: Journal of peace research, Band 48, Heft 6, S. 807-816
ISSN: 1460-3578
This article presents the Religion and State-Minorities (RASM) dataset addressing its design, collection, and utility. RASM codes religious discrimination by governments against all 566 minorities in 175 countries which make a minimum population cutoff. It includes 24 specific types of religious discrimination coded yearly from 1990 to 2002. Religious discrimination measures the absence of the human right of religious freedom which includes limits on religious practices such as worship as well as limits on religious institutions such as churches and mosques which are not placed on the majority group. Thus the dataset focuses on the restriction of religious group rights. Most similar datasets, including those that focus on human rights in general, include a single discrimination score for a country. RASM is the first to contain an accounting of religious discrimination against all relevant religious minorities on an individual basis while avoiding some methodological problems of previous similar data collections. In order to demonstrate the utility of the dataset, we examine the relationship between religious identity and religious discrimination. We find that both majority and minority identities matter in predicting the treatment of religious minorities. This demonstration that codings for individual minorities add to our understanding of the correlates of religious discrimination is illustrative of the potential uses of this dataset. It also indicates that this type of data can be useful in other types of studies where dyads based on religious identity are relevant, such as studies of ethnic conflict and civil war.
In: Politics, religion & ideology, Band 12, Heft 4, S. 449-470
ISSN: 2156-7697
In: Ethnopolitics, Band 10, Heft 3-4, S. 271-295
ISSN: 1744-9065
In: Journal of peace research, Band 48, Heft 6, S. 807-817
ISSN: 0022-3433
In: Nationalism & ethnic politics, Band 17, Heft 4, S. 423-446
ISSN: 1557-2986
In: Politics and religion: official journal of the APSA Organized Section on Religion and Politics, Band 5, Heft 3, S. 528-554
ISSN: 1755-0491
AbstractReligious movements have long been challenging the modernist and secularist ideas around the world. Within the last decade or so, pro-religious parties made significant electoral advances in various countries, including India, Sudan, Algeria, and the Palestinian territories. In this article, we focus on the rise of the pro-religious Justice and Development Party (Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi- AKP) to power in the 2002 elections in Turkey. Using the Turkish experience with political Islam, we evaluate the explanatory value of Mark Juergensmeyer's rise of religious nationalism theory, with a special emphasis on the "failed secularism" argument. Our analysis indicates that the theoretical approach formulated by Juergensmeyer has a great deal of explanatory power; however, it does not provide a complete explanation for the success of the AKP. The rise of religion in Turkish politics is the result of a complex process over long years of encounter and confrontation between two frameworks of order, starting with the sudden imposition of secularism from above, when the republic was established. Hence, to understand the rise of religion in contemporary Turkish politics, an in-depth understanding of history, politics, and the sources of tension between secularists and Islamists is essential. The findings of this article have important implications for other countries, especially those that are experiencing a resurgence of religion in politics, and are struggling to integrate religious parties into a democratic system.