Suchergebnisse
Filter
15 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Italy in uncertain times. Europeanizing foreign policy in the declining processes of the American hegemony: by Carla Monteleone, London, Lexington Books, 2019, 206 pp., £60.00 (hardback), ISBN: 978-1-4985-8183-7
In: Journal of contemporary European studies, Band 28, Heft 1, S. 128-130
ISSN: 1478-2790
Responsibility to protect, NATO and the problem of who should intervene: reassessing the intervention in Libya
In: Global change, peace & security, Band 29, Heft 3, S. 293-309
ISSN: 1478-1166
No Easy Way Out: Origins of NATO's Difficulties in Afghanistan
In: Contemporary security policy, Band 36, Heft 2, S. 200-218
ISSN: 1743-8764
NATO Beyond 9/11. The transformation of the Atlantic alliance
In: Journal of transatlantic studies: the official publication of the Transatlantic Studies Association (TSA), Band 13, Heft 2, S. 226-227
ISSN: 1754-1018
No easy way out: origins of NATO's difficulties in Afghanistan
In: Contemporary security policy, Band 36, Heft 2, S. 200-218
ISSN: 1352-3260, 0144-0381
World Affairs Online
Intervention and Promotion of Democracy. The Paradoxes of External Democratization and the Power-Sharing Between International Officials and Local Political Leaders
In: World political science, Band 9, Heft 1, S. 131-153
ISSN: 2363-4782, 1935-6226
AbstractSince the end of the Cold War new practices of external interferences in the domestic affairs of states have revealed an unprecedented relationship between international intervention and the promotion of democracy. In fact, the new generation of peace-building missions is oriented toward the democratization of the target country. Moving from the paradoxes brought about by the goal of democratization, the paper offers an explanation of the power-sharing between international officials and local political actors in the target country. On the one hand, a democratic approach to international intervention fosters self-determination, tends to grant sovereignty and independence and considers the international mandate as temporary. On the other hand, the goal of democratization entails the establishment of enduring neo-trusteeships, violating the sovereignty and independence of the target-state. The paper focuses on three case-studies (Bosnia, Kosovo and East Timor) to assess how those paradoxes lead to conflicting attitudes by international officials – who both concede and retain essential powers over local political actors – creating a power-sharing in the target country.
Intervento e promozione della democrazia. I paradossi della democratizzazione e la co-gestione delle funzioni di governo fra funzionari internazionali e attori politici locali - 1. Introduzione . 2. Le nuove forme di ingerenza, « peace-building » e democratizzazione . 3. I paradossi dell'interventis...
In: Italian Political Science Review: Rivista italiana di scienza politica, Band 42, Heft 2, S. 197-220
ISSN: 0048-8402
Trump's legacy and the liberal international order: why Trump failed to institutionalise an anti-global agenda
In: The international spectator: journal of the Istituto Affari Internazionali, Band 58, Heft 1, S. 92-108
ISSN: 1751-9721
World Affairs Online
Trump's Legacy and the Liberal International Order: Why Trump Failed to Institutionalise an Anti-global Agenda
In: The international spectator: journal of the Istituto Affari Internazionali, Band 58, Heft 1, S. 92-108
ISSN: 1751-9721
All the President's men. Leadership style, advisory system and Donald Trump's mixed record in foreign policy
In: Global policy: gp, Band 14, Heft 1, S. 95-106
ISSN: 1758-5899
AbstractDonald Trump was expected to dismantle the internationalist approach that has dominated US foreign policy since the end of the Second World War. However, his impact is narrower than is commonly supposed. In some areas, he was able to generate some significant change, while in many others he failed to pursue his revisionist agenda. This article explores the reasons for this surprising result by investigating the relationship between Trump's leadership style and his advisory system. Building on the model of Preston and t'Hart it elaborates a new framework for presidents with leadership traits similar to Trump's, namely, a high need for power, low conceptual complexity, and low experience. The model presents two opposite ideal‐types of interaction between the President and their advisory system – 'presidential predominance' vs. 'presidential permissiveness' – that help us better understand how Trump failed in certain issue areas and succeeded in others. The model is then tested on two case studies, one in which the president failed and the other in which he achieved his goals. These are respectively the cases of NATO and the World Health Organization (WHO).
Cui prodest? Italy's questionable involvement in multilateral military operations amid ethical concerns and national interest
In: International peacekeeping, Band 24, Heft 1, S. 86
ISSN: 1380-748X
Cui prodest?: Italy's questionable involvement in multilateral military operations amid ethical concerns and national interest
In: International peacekeeping, Band 24, Heft 1, S. 86-107
ISSN: 1353-3312
World Affairs Online
Cui prodest? Italy's questionable involvement in multilateral military operations amid ethical concerns and national interest
In: International peacekeeping, Band 24, Heft 1, S. 86-107
ISSN: 1743-906X
La Nato e la distribuzione dei costi della forza
In: Italian Political Science Review: Rivista italiana di scienza politica, Band 40, Heft 1, S. 23-59
ISSN: 0048-8402