Objective: Comprehend the working process of professionals in Therapeutic Residential Service, their potentialities and limitations in the process of rebuilding the life of the resident outside of a mental hospital. Method: This is a case study, with a qualitative research approach. Results: It was demonstrated a new conception of the object, a large arsenal of instruments based on psychosocial knowledge, and the goal is different from the healing provided by the asylum mode. Discussion: The subject in psychological distress, is now seen as an extended object, an active participant in the process of understanding madness as a different way of relating with the world and belonging to a territory, a family, social group, which enables social insertion according to individual needs. Conclusion: This perception tries to provide a substitute the mental hospitals, for the freedom to walk around on the city, in an attempt to help residents to rebuild their lives outside the asylums.
Objective: To evaluate the challenges and the potentialities of the network of mental health from the Family Health Strategy. Methods: It is a descriptive and exploratory study, with qualitative methodological approach. The data collection occurred in the period of April to May 2012 in Family Health Units in the city of Pelotas/ RS. There were performed semi-structured interviews with six managers, which were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Results: The challenges are highlighted by: lack of support from management, excessive use of psychotropic drugs, some professionals do not know their users and lack of communication on the network. The potentialities are: the recognition of the involvement of professionals with the actions of mental health and the concern of managers with the practices of mental health within their services. Conclusion: The care involves many social actors that need to work in network to mitigate the challenges and strengthen the potential to affect the care.
Objetivo: analisar as implicações psicossociais decorrentes da pandemia da COVID-19, relatadas em atendimento online, pela ótica dos conceitos de biopoder, biopolítica e de governamentalidade de Michel Foucault. Método: pesquisa qualitativa do tipo documental, com a análise dos registros de prontuários de usuários atendidos em um chat de escuta terapêutica, entre abril e outubro de 2020. Resultados: os dados foram organizados em duas temáticas: Governamentalidade na pandemia de COVID-19 e a produção de implicações psicossociais de ansiedade e medo e Disciplinarizações e sujeições na pandemia de COVID-19: subjetividades marcadas pela tristeza e angústia. A primeira demonstra que a "arte de governar" no Brasil produziu instabilidades e incertezas que influenciaram na produção do medo da contaminação/morte/e não acesso ao tratamento e ansiedade. Na segunda temática, percebe-se como o controle disciplinar e a regulamentação biopolítica se combinam. No Brasil, um país extremamente desigual, tem-se produzido sujeição e subjetividades marcadas pela angústia, sentimentos de desânimo e tristeza. Conclusão: os processos excludentes foram aprofundados na pandemia, com exercício de uma biopolítica que precariza a vida e produz sofrimento psíquico. ; Objective: to analyze the psychosocial implications arising from the COVID-19 pandemic, reported in online service, from the perspective of Michel Foucault's concepts of biopower, biopolitics and governmentality. Method: qualitative documental research, with analysis of medical records of users assisted in a therapeutic listening chat, between April and October 2020. Results: the data were organized into two themes: Governmentality in the COVID-19 pandemic and the production of psychosocial implications of anxiety and fear and Discipline and subjection in the COVID-19 pandemic: subjectivities marked by sadness and anguish. The first demonstrates that the "art of governing" in Brazil produced instabilities and uncertainties that influenced the production of fear of contamination/death/and non-access to treatment and anxiety. In the second theme, we can see how disciplinary control and biopolitical regulation are combined. In Brazil, an extremely unequal country, subjectivity and subjectivities marked by anguish, feelings of discouragement and sadness have been produced. Conclusion: the exclusionary processes were deepened in the pandemic, with the exercise of a biopolitics that makes life precarious and produces psychological distress. ; Objetivo: analizar las implicaciones psicosociales derivadas de la pandemia de la COVID-19, relatadas en el servicio online, desde la perspectiva de los conceptos de biopoder, biopolítica y gubernamentalidad de Michel Foucault. Método: investigación documental cualitativa, con análisis de prontuarios de usuarios atendidos en chat de escucha terapéutica, entre abril y octubre de 2020. Resultados: los datos fueron organizados en dos temas: Gubernamentalidad en la pandemia de la COVID-19 y la producción de implicaciones psicosociales de la ansiedad y el miedo y Disciplinas y sujeciones en la pandemia de la COVID-19: subjetividades marcadas por la tristeza y la angustia. El primero demuestra que el "arte de gobernar" en Brasil produjo inestabilidades e incertidumbres que influyeron en la producción de miedo a la contaminación/muerte/y no acceso al tratamiento y ansiedad. En el segundo tema, podemos ver cómo se combinan el control disciplinario y la regulación biopolítica. En Brasil, país sumamente desigual, se han producido subjetividades y subjetividades marcadas por la angustia, sentimientos de desánimo y tristeza. Conclusión: los procesos de exclusión se profundizaron en la pandemia, con el ejercicio de una biopolítica que precariza la vida y produce sufrimiento psíquico.
