Suchergebnisse

Due to the extreme diversity of economic conditions, the level of interregional differences in Russia is unique. The extent of these differences is usually measured by traditional indicators of variation based on per capita GRP indicators. However, while the movement of the coefficient of variation, for example, reflects the systemic properties of the object under study, it may not capture structural spatial shifts. But it is precisely these shifts, if they are stable, that are of particular interest both as a subject of scientific research and as an object of management by authorities. The main question posed in the article is the following: Is there a connection between the level of economic development of a region and its "propensity" for structural displacement? Or in other words: how stable is the territory's position in the interregional ranking of per capita GRP indicators, does it depend on the value of per capita GRP? It turns out that noticeable structural shifts (predominant growth or increasingly lagging behind the per capita GRP of the region relative to the national average) are the prerogative, first of all, of territories with a level of per capita GDP close to the average.