Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
54 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Administrative science quarterly: ASQ, Band 65, Heft 3, S. NP24-NP26
ISSN: 1930-3815
In: American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Forthcoming
SSRN
In: Health Economics (2013)
SSRN
In: Just, David R. and Brian Wansink (2009), "Better School Meals on a Budget: Using Behavioral Economics and Food Psychology to Improve Meal Selection," Choices, 24:3, 1-6
SSRN
In: Handbooks in economics
In: American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Band 98, Heft 4, S. 1181-1194
SSRN
In: American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Band 97, Heft 5, S. 1385-1399
SSRN
SSRN
Working paper
In: The journal of human resources, Band 48, Heft 4, S. 855-872
ISSN: 1548-8004
In: American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Band 88, Heft 4, S. 882-899
SSRN
In: Applied economic perspectives and policy, Band 43, Heft 2, S. 716-731
ISSN: 2040-5804
AbstractThis study contributes to the growing literature on household resource allocation across time by examining monthly cycles of food pantry visitation. This study uses 13 years of data from over 40,000 households who visited the Food Bank for Larimer County in Northern Colorado. Analysis reveals that pantry visitation fluctuates dramatically by day of the month and is highest at the end of the month among the general pantry client population. Further analysis examines these monthly cycles with consideration for the Colorado SNAP distribution schedule, with results that suggest pantry visitation increases when SNAP benefits run out.JEL CLASSIFICATIOND15 (Intertemporal Household Choice); Q18 (Food Policy)
In: Just, David R., Brian Wansink, and Andrew S. Hanks (2014), "Chefs Move to Schools: A Preliminary Examination of How Chef-created Dishes can Increase School Lunch Participation and Fruit and Vegetable Intake, Appetite, 83:242-247.
SSRN
In: American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Band 95, Heft 5, S. 1049-1067
SSRN
In: Applied economic perspectives and policy, Band 32, Heft 1, S. 4-32
ISSN: 2040-5804
AbstractThe efficacy of alternative biofuel policies in achieving energy, environmental and agricultural policy goals is assessed using economic cost‐benefit analysis. Government mandates are superior to consumption subsidies, especially with suboptimal fuel taxes and the higher costs involved with raising tax revenues. But subsidies with mandates cause adverse interaction effects; oil consumption is subsidized instead. This unique result also applies to renewable electricity that faces similar policy combinations. Ethanol policy can have a significant impact on corn prices; if not, inefficiency costs rise sharply. Ethanol policy can increase the inefficiency of farm subsidies and vice‐versa. Policies that discriminate against trade, such as production subsidies and tariffs, can more than offset any benefits of a mandate. Sustainability standards are ineffective and illegal according to the WTO, and so should be re‐designed.