Cover -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- 1 Deparochializing Political Theory and Beyond: A Dialogue Approach to Comparative Political Thought James Tully -- 2 A Conversation with James Tully's "Deparochializing Political Theory and Beyond" Garrick Cooper -- 3 Whose Tradition? Which Practices? Sor-hoon Tan -- 4 Historicizing Political Theory Sudipta Kaviraj -- 5 Dialogues in Black and White Charles W. Mills -- 6 Continuing the Dialogue James Tully -- Afterword: Concluding Reflections Monika Kirloskar-Steinbach -- Notes on Contributors -- Index.
Zugriffsoptionen:
Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
In der philosophischen Forschungsliteratur zur Einwanderungsproblematik wird die Einwanderung überwiegend aus der Perspektive des Individuums diskutiert, das sich zur Migration entschließt. In diesem Zusammenhang werden zum Beispiel Fragen einer gerechten globalen Ressourcenverteilung oder eines Menschenrechts auf Einwanderung erörtert. Dabei wird jedoch die Perspektive des Einwanderungslandes und damit die nationalstaatliche Dimension des Immigrationsproblems ausgeblendet, wie die Autorin in ihrem Beitrag betont. Sie entwickelt vor diesem Hintergrund den Begriff einer "liberalen nationalen Identität". Sie geht ferner auf die in Deutschland geführte Diskussion über nationale Identität ein, in welcher sich mit der "universalistischen" und der "traditionalistischen" Position zwei diametral entgegengesetzte Auffassungen von nationaler Identität gegenüberstehen. Die Autorin erörtert in diesem Zusammenhang die Frage, ob und inwiefern sich der kontextualistische Ansatz von Joseph Carens fruchtbar machen lässt, um zwischen diesen beiden Positionen zu vermitteln. (ICI2)
Drawing on select works of Adorno, we will first rehearse his reasons for a rejuvenation of philosophy and apply them to philosophers working on world philosophical traditions. We will then analyse Adorno's arguments pertaining to the theory–praxis relation to ascertain whether his thought could accommodate a study of world philosophical traditions for the simple reason that they are present in a particular society. Shifting our focus slightly, we reflect upon how current ways of professional philosophizing affect the study of world philosophical traditions. As the example of Māori philosophy demonstrates, current philosophical practices seem to delimit the search for the unconventional in academic philosophy. Through its philosophical appropriation, the so-called unconventional tends to mimic conventional patterns in academic philosophy. We will then attempt to find reasons to critique this process within the Adornoian framework itself. The conclusion draws together different strands of the discussion and delineates some paths to take forward the world philosophies project in an Adornoian spirit.
The Planning Moment elaborates the myriad ways that plans and planning practices pervade recent global history. The books twenty-seven case studies draw attention to the centrality of planning in colonial and postcolonial environments, relationships, and contexts
Empires and their aftermaths were massive planning institutions; in the past two hundred years, the natural and social sciences emerged—at least in part—as modes of knowledge production for imperial planning. Yet these connections are frequently under-emphasized in the history of science and its corollary fields. The Planning Moment explores the myriad ways plans and planning practices pervade recent global history. The book is built around twenty-seven brief case studies that explore the centrality of planning in colonial and postcolonial environments, relationships, and contexts, through a range of disciplines: the history of science, science and technology studies, colonial and postcolonial studies, urban studies, and the history of knowledge.If colonialism made certain landscapes, populations, and institutions legible while obscuring others, The Planning Moment reveals the frequently disruptive and violent processes of erasure in imperial planning by examining how "common sense" was produced and how the intransigence of planning persists long after decolonization. In recognizing the resistance and subversion that often met colonial plans, the book makes visible a range of strategies and techniques by which planning was modified and reappropriated, and by which decolonial futures might be imagined.Contributors: Itty Abraham, Benjamin Allen, Sarah Blacker, Emily Brownell, Lino Camprubí, John DiMoia, Mona Fawaz, Lilly Irani, Chihyung Jeon, Robert Kett, Monika Kirloskar-Steinbach, Karen McAllister, Laura Mitchell, Gregg Mitman, Aaron Moore (†), Nada Moumtaz, Tahani Nadim, Anindita Nag, Raúl Necochea López, Tamar Novick, Benjamin Peters, Juno Salazar Parreñas, Martina Schlünder, Sarah Van Beurden, Helen Verran, Ana Carolina Vimieiro Gomes, Alexandra Widmer, and Alden Young
Zugriffsoptionen:
Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext: