Public Policy for Private Higher Education: A Global Analysis
In: Journal of comparative policy analysis: research and practice, Band 13, Heft 4, S. 383-396
ISSN: 1572-5448
27 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Journal of comparative policy analysis: research and practice, Band 13, Heft 4, S. 383-396
ISSN: 1572-5448
In: Perspectives on politics, Band 1, Heft 3, S. 623-624
ISSN: 1541-0986
In: Perspectives on politics: a political science public sphere, Band 1, Heft 3, S. 623-624
ISSN: 1537-5927
In: Studies in comparative international development: SCID, Band 30, Heft 2, S. 3-25
ISSN: 1936-6167
In: Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly: journal of the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action, Band 24, Heft 1, S. 41-58
ISSN: 1552-7395
Latin America's nonprofit research centers have a major impact on politics and society as well as on academia. Crucial to this impact is the central nonprofit challenge of attracting sufficient, stable income. The centers have done a remarkable job of building a novel and increasingly diversified income profile. This profile ruptures the region's statist tradition as it rests on voluntary giving, markets, an evolving private-public mix, and pluralism.
In: Studies in comparative international development, Band 30, Heft 2, S. 3-25
ISSN: 0039-3606
Conventional development models refer to two sectors, public & for-profit private. Massive growth of nonprofit private activity undermines that picture. Latin American think tanks exemplify a nonprofit privatization that has an enormous impact on development & remolds intersectoral relationships overall. Four major dynamics acount for the spectacular growth of the region's nonprofit think tanks. Three push factors are state repression, state weakness, & public university problems, &, as epitomized by financial supply, a pull factor is also crucial to attract nonprofit growth. To conceptualize these findings, public failure theory is considered. Unhelpful regarding the pull factor, the theory otherwise works reasonably well, especially where there is visible movement from the public to the nonprofit sector. Beyond that, the evidence suggests ways to broaden the theory. Even a broadened formulation cannot fully capture the remarkable diversity & vitality of the growth in Latin America's think tanks. But the key growth factors that blend together to produce particular institutional & national configurations can be identified & analyzed. 53 References. Adapted from the source document.
In: Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly: journal of the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action, Band 23, Heft 3, S. 284-287
ISSN: 1552-7395
In: Ciencia y Sociedad, Band 16, Heft 1, S. 57-90
ISSN: 2613-8751
Se evalúan las experiencias de universidades privadas en América Latina, presentando su crecimiento, sus diferentes metas y los intereses y grupos a que sirven. Este trabajo analiza en qué sentidos, dentro de qué contextos, con qué reservaciones, y para quién, el sector privado ha sido un éxito o no.
In: American political science review, Band 82, Heft 3, S. 1006-1008
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 493, Heft 1, S. 195-196
ISSN: 1552-3349
In: The American journal of sociology, Band 92, Heft 6, S. 1555-1558
ISSN: 1537-5390
In: Current history: a journal of contemporary world affairs, Band 86, Heft 518, S. 113-116
ISSN: 1944-785X
In: Current history: a journal of contemporary world affairs, Band 86, S. 113-116
ISSN: 0011-3530
Contents: A weakening political class; Expanded and emboldened oppositions.
In: Current history: a journal of contemporary world affairs, Band 86, Heft 518, S. 113-116,132-133
ISSN: 0011-3530
World Affairs Online
In: Latin American research review: LARR ; the journal of the Latin American Studies Association (LASA), Band 21, Heft 3, S. 95-128
ISSN: 0023-8791
Authoritarian rule has profoundly transformed Chilean universities. The influence is great on almost all indicators explored but especially on those focusing on political processes and qualitative dimensions. Since 1973 higher education policy - in admissions, appointments, curriculum and finance - has been largely consistent with principal features of bureaucratic authoritarianism. Thus, policy has gone beyond reversing the percieved excesses of Popular Unity rule (1970-1973) to establishing certain unprecedented conditions
World Affairs Online