Suchergebnisse
Filter
61 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Review article: Recent research on Australian parties
In: Politics: Australasian Political Studies Association journal, Band 1, Heft 1, S. 56-61
The Changing Pattern of American Politics*
In: The Australian journal of politics and history: AJPH, Band 12, Heft 1, S. 32-42
ISSN: 1467-8497
The changing pattern of American politics [party alignments and party structure in the United States are being altered by social and economic changes which began with the twentieth century and were accelerated after the Second world war; based on address]
In: The Australian journal of politics and history: AJPH, Band 12, S. 32-42
ISSN: 0004-9522
Australian Party Politics. By James Jupp. (Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 1964. Pp. ix, 235 $7.50.)
In: American political science review, Band 59, Heft 2, S. 500-501
ISSN: 1537-5943
Cabinet Government in Australia.S. Encel
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 25, Heft 2, S. 406-407
ISSN: 1468-2508
The Costs of Democracy. By Alexander Heard. (Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press. 1960. Pp. xxv, 493. $6.00)
In: American political science review, Band 54, Heft 3, S. 732-733
ISSN: 1537-5943
Promises and Performances in Australian Politics. By Russell H. Barrett. (New York: Institute of Pacific Relations. 1959. Pp. 126. S2.50.)
In: American political science review, Band 54, Heft 2, S. 560-561
ISSN: 1537-5943
The British and New Zealand Labour Parties: A Comparison. Part 2: Today
In: Political science, Band 9, Heft 2, S. 15-31
ISSN: 2041-0611
The British and New Zealand Labour Parties: A Comparison. Part 1: Heritage
In: Political science, Band 9, Heft 1, S. 23-35
ISSN: 2041-0611
The British and New Zealand labour parties: a comparison; today
In: Political science, Band 9, S. 15-31
ISSN: 0112-8760, 0032-3187
Part 1 is listed in the 1957 P.A.I.S. annual.
The New Zealand Labor Party
In: American political science review, Band 49, Heft 3, S. 708-732
ISSN: 1537-5943
The New Zealand Labor party came into being after years of indecision and disunity, and many false starts. The history of this movement lies outside the scope of this article, but a brief discussion of the basic cleavages which divided labor before 1916, and of the circumstances under which the party was organized, may help to clarify some of the points in the analysis of its present-day structure and problems which is attempted in the pages ahead.The geography and economy of New Zealand encouraged small, widely scattered productive units and decentralized unions relatively weak in bargaining power. The economy is dependent largely upon agriculture and the earlier industries were concerned chiefly with the processing of primary products such as butter, cheese, and meat. The thinly scattered population, the remoteness of the "four main centers" (Auckland, Wellington, Christchurch, and Dunedin) and many of the provincial towns, the variations in conditions from locality to locality, and the absence of mass production industries discouraged the development of a cohesive labor movement ready to support its demands by unified industrial action. Among those groups of workers who were thrown together on the job, such as the "watersiders" (dockworkers) and the miners, there was greater solidarity than among others and these were more inclined to press their claims by direct action. The trades and labor councils that developed in the various centers and met in Dominion-wide annual congresses after 1891 were the stronghold of the more moderate unions. Periodically their tactics were challenged by the militant groups, and differences crystallized in the formation of rival organizations.