History Strikes Back: The State of International Relations Theory
In: Australian journal of political science: journal of the Australasian Political Studies Association, Band 29, Heft 1, S. 179
ISSN: 1036-1146
44 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Australian journal of political science: journal of the Australasian Political Studies Association, Band 29, Heft 1, S. 179
ISSN: 1036-1146
In: Review of international studies: RIS, Band 14, Heft 4, S. 309-316
ISSN: 1469-9044
It is not surprising that international crises have become a subject of intensive study in the nuclear age. The example of Sarajevo stands as an awesome warning of the repercussions which can flow from an apparently minor incident. The Cuban missile crisis seemed for a time to suggest guidelines by which crises could be successfully 'managed', but the dangers of generalizing from an optimistic reading of that unique case have come to be widely appreciated.
In: World politics: a quarterly journal of international relations, Band 40, Heft 3, S. 289-316
ISSN: 1086-3338
AbstractHistorical research since the opening of the British archives in the late 1960s has brought about a substantial revision of the image of appeasement that had generally been accepted after World War II. Yet the traditional image has scarcely been questioned in contemporary writing on international relations. This article examines some of the central themes in recent studies relating to appeasement: the "structural" approach, which offers a new overall interpretation; the economic, military, and intelligence "dimensions" of British foreign policy in the 1930s; and the breaking down of traditional stereotypes of the roles of Chamberlain and Churchill. This reappraisal has important implications for the discipline of international relations, its view of the origins of World War II, and theories of international structural change.
In: World politics: a quarterly journal of international relations, Band 40, Heft 3, S. 289-316
ISSN: 0043-8871
World Affairs Online
In: Review of international studies: RIS, Band 14, Heft 4, S. 309
ISSN: 0260-2105
In: American political science review, Band 68, Heft 3, S. 1392-1393
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: American political science review, Band 66, Heft 4, S. 1420-1421
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: World politics: a quarterly journal of international relations, Band 24, Heft 4, S. 579-612
ISSN: 1086-3338
The writings of the so-called Cold-War revisionists have had a powerful impact in recent years. In the case of the new generation coming to political awareness, analogies drawn or suggested between Vietnam and the period of the origins of the Cold War carry immediate conviction: many others have had their image of contemporary history challenged or even shattered, and those not persuaded by the revisionist case would acknowledge that important questions have been raised. Undoubtedly circumstances have favored the revisionist critique.
In: The Australian journal of politics and history: AJPH, Band 16, Heft 1, S. 1-10
ISSN: 1467-8497
In: The Australian yearbook of international law, Band 3, Heft 1, S. 286-287
ISSN: 2666-0229
In: Australian outlook: journal of the Australian Institute of International Affairs, Band 24, S. 51-60
ISSN: 0004-9913
This book offers the first comprehensive account and re-appraisal of the formative phase of what is often termed the 'Grotian tradition' in international relations theory: the view that sovereign states are not free to act at will, but are akin to members of a society, bound by its norms. It examines the period from the later fifteenth to the mid-seventeenth centuries, focusing on four thinkers: Erasmus, Vitoria, Gentili and Grotius himself, and is structured by the author's concept of international society. Erasmus' views on international relations have been entirely neglected, but underlying his work is a consistent image of international society. The theologian Francisco de Vitoria concerns himself with its normative principles, the lawyer Alberico Gentili - unexpectedly, the central figure in the narrative - with its extensive practical applications. Grotius, however, does not re-affirm the concept, but wavers at crucial points. This book suggests that the Grotian tradition is a misnomer.
In: International Journal, Band 36, Heft 3, S. 679
In: International Journal, Band 33, Heft 3, S. 629
In: Australian journal of international affairs: journal of the Australian Institute of International Affairs, Band 45, Heft 1, S. 60, 70, 78
ISSN: 1035-7718