Suchergebnisse

Abstract
Building on conceptions of policing as a colonial project, this article contributes to spatial and sensory understandings of policing by examining everyday practices of gender and racial criminalization. I argue that criminalization results from 'seeing like a cop' (Guenther 2019), and reordering and securing spaces accordingly. I explore the logics, practices and effects of this regime of visuality and spatial governance, drawing upon research on the criminalization of women who experience interpersonal, state and structural violence in Melbourne, Australia. For these women, police visions of danger, disorder and disposability pre-empt their displacement and punishment. The perceptual practices of police forge carceral continuums that connect the gentrifying streetscape and the home, producing both as sites of racial surveillance and gender entrapment. The article highlights the capacity for sensory analysis to deepen understandings of the violence work of policing.

This paper develops a conception of 'carceral atmospheres' as a way of framing our encounter with the sound art and archive how are you today, created by the Manus Recording Project Collective (MRPC). This 2018 work involved the creation and collection of 84 field recordings by six asylum seekers and refugees indefinitely detained on Manus Island by the Australian government. I argue that a proper engagement with the medium and mode of production of how are you today – that is, offshore detention and transborder solidarity – requires a sensory politics that is attuned to the dynamic and increasingly diffuse nature of carceral power. The paper explores the tension between the tangible and intangible nature of carceral space, the heterogeneity of prison soundscapes and the significance of time to experiences of punishment. Complicating the presumption of sound as object of analysis, I consider how field recordings both convey and create atmospheres.

Intro -- Foreword -- Acknowledgements -- Contents -- Notes on Contributors -- List of Tables -- Part I What is Agile Working? -- 1 Introduction to Agile Working and Well-Being in the Digital Age -- 1.1 Agile Working and Well-Being in the Digital Age -- 1.2 What Is Agile Working? -- 1.2.1 Promoting Temporal and Spatial Flexibility -- 1.2.2 Integrating Resources -- 1.2.3 Engaging in Innovative Activities -- 1.2.4 Utilising New Communication and Digital Technologies -- 1.3 What Issues Arise from Agile Working? -- 1.4 The Structure of This Book -- 1.4.1 What Is Agile Working? -- 1.4.2 Managing Boundaries -- 1.4.3 Managing Digital Communications -- 1.4.4 Healthy, Effective and Sustainable Agile Working -- 1.4.5 Dynamic and Innovative Approaches to Effectively Managing and Sharing Resources -- 1.4.6 Conclusions -- 1.5 Summary -- References -- 2 Concepts, Terms and Measurement in Agile Working -- 2.1 Introduction -- 2.2 Terms Used in 'Agile Working' -- 2.2.1 The Impetus and History Behind Remote and Flexible Working and How This Relates to 'Agile Working' -- 2.3 Measurement of Agile Working -- 2.3.1 The E-Work Life Scale -- 2.4 Future Directions in Agile Working -- 2.5 Conclusion -- References -- Part II Managing Boundaries -- 3 Boundary Management: Getting the Work-Home Balance Right -- 3.1 Introduction -- 3.2 Defining Work-Life Boundaries -- 3.3 Managing Boundaries -- 3.4 Agile Working Challenges to Boundary Management -- 3.5 How Can Organisations Provide Boundary Management Support? -- 3.6 Conclusion -- References -- Part III Managing Digital Communications -- 4 The Paradox of Work-Email: Individual Differences in Agile Digital Work -- 4.1 Introduction -- 4.2 Does Work-Email Facilitate Agile Working? -- 4.3 The Role of Personality in Understanding Effective Work-Email Use -- 4.3.1 Preferences for Managing Work-Home Boundaries.

Measuring affective well-being in organizational studies has become increasingly widespread, given its association with key work-performance and other markers of organizational functioning. As such, researchers and policy-makers need to be confident that well-being measures are valid, reliable and robust. To reduce the burden on participants in applied settings, short-form measures of affective well-being are proving popular. However, these scales are seldom validated as standalone, comprehensive measures in their own right. In this article, we used a short-form measure of affective well-being with 10 items: the Daniels five-factor measure of affective well-being (D-FAW). In Study 1, across six applied sample groups ( N = 2624), we found that the factor structure of the short-form D-FAW is robust when issued as a standalone measure, and that it should be scored differently depending on the participant instruction used. When participant instructions focus on now or today, then affect is best represented by five discrete emotion factors. When participant instructions focus on the past week, then affect is best represented by two or three mood-based factors. In Study 2 ( N = 39), we found good construct convergent validity of short-form D-FAW with another widely used scale (PANAS). Implications for the measurement and structure of affect are discussed.

Taking an abolition feminist standpoint, this article develops a critique of the absorption of the language of 'trauma-informed practice' into gendered penal policy. We use Carol Bacchi's methodology for post-structural policy analysis, which centres around the question, 'what is the problem represented to be?', and apply it to an Australian correctional policy document designed to inform practice in the Victorian women's prison system: Strengthening Connections. We find that the policy constructs criminalised women's trauma as an individual psychological pathology that causes 'criminal offending' and makes them vulnerable to further harm. In effect, the prison is framed as both necessary for the protection of the community and for the protection of criminalised women themselves. We argue that these discursive distortions sanitise the structural violence of the prison and revalorise the carceral state under the guises of rehabilitation and therapy. Our contribution highlights broader implications and challenges for criminological research that engages attempts to 'soften' carceral conditions without reckoning with their capacity to entrench gendered carceralism.

New technologies for recording, reproducing, and disseminating sound are increasingly accessible and provide important opportunities for listening to accounts of confinement. Through a politics and practice of 'earwitnessing detention', this article explores experiential patterns and distinctions between immigration detention and imprisonment. By 'tuning in' to radio and podcasting emerging from and through carceral spaces, we argue that both detained asylum seekers and Aboriginal prisoners in Australia narrate an experience of 'indefinite stuckness'. Indefinite stuckness is an existential condition within a carceral continuum that is both spatial and temporal, and characterised by massive racial inequalities. For detained asylum seekers, indefinite stuckness manifests in the absence of a set release date, whereas for Aboriginal prisoners, it is a cycle of criminalisation and re-incarceration in the colony. This important distinction shapes how detention is represented: as torturous and abusive, or as an opportunity for respite from the 'chaos' outside. Linking these sometimes-divergent accounts of confinement are themes of friendship and community as forms of survival and resistance to the abjection that frequently accompanies indefinite stuckness.

Australia's offshore immigration detention centers are characterized by a culture of secrecy that keeps human rights abuses hidden. Yet, detainees are employing new technologies and media to narrate their experiences of incarceration. This article examines the potentials and limitations of bearing witness and exercising acoustic agency through podcasting. It provides a case study of The Messenger podcast in which a refugee detained on Manus Island exchanges voice messages with an Australian journalist. It finds that podcasting can breach the secrecy that sustains a punitive detention regime and evoke empathy in listeners through the affective nature of voice. However, podcasting is limited by the sense of distance produced by prerecorded and edited sound and by the risk of creating echo chambers through the selective nature of podcast consumption. Finally, we adapt, develop, and argue for the concept of earwitnessing as a practice of responsible and political listening to injustice.

Women's rates of remand, or pre-trial detention, have grown dramatically in Australia and the rates at which Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women are incarcerated without conviction are particularly high. However, there is little research examining bail and remand practices and their relationship to social inequalities. This article presents findings from research on the drivers behind women's increasing rates of custodial remand in Victoria—a jurisdiction that has significantly restricted access to bail through legislative reforms. Drawing on data derived from interviews with criminal defence and duty lawyers, we outline how bail and remand practices systematically disadvantage women experiencing housing insecurity and domestic and family violence (DFV), increasing their risk of becoming trapped in longer-term cycles of incarceration. Our analysis reinforces the need to move away from 'tough on crime' approaches to bail. It also highlights unintended consequences of DFV reforms, including further marginalising and punishing criminalised women who are victim-survivors.