Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
54 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Pitt series in Russian and East European studies
In: Pitt series in Russian and East European studies
In: Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism: JPICT, Band 19, Heft 2, S. 207-222
ISSN: 2159-5364
In: The American interest: policy, politics & culture, Band 13, Heft 3, S. 25-35
ISSN: 1556-5777
World Affairs Online
In: Social epistemology: a journal of knowledge, culture and policy, Band 30, Heft 3, S. 251-272
ISSN: 1464-5297
In: Political studies review, Band 13, Heft 1, S. 123-124
ISSN: 1478-9302
In: The American interest: policy, politics & culture, Band 10, Heft 5, S. 24-32
ISSN: 1556-5777
World Affairs Online
In: The American interest: policy, politics & culture, Band 9, Heft 5, S. 85-95
ISSN: 1556-5777
World Affairs Online
In: Perspectives on politics, Band 11, Heft 4, S. 1177-1179
ISSN: 1541-0986
In: Politics, philosophy & economics, Band 11, Heft 1, S. 76-96
ISSN: 1741-3060
The scarcity of resources required to produce justice is manifested in the relation between the accuracy, depth, and scope of materially possible forms of justice. Ceteris paribus, increases in the accuracy of justice must come at the expense of its depth and scope, and vice versa, though they are not linearly proportioned. The accuracy of justice is the degree of agreement between the possible results of attempts to implement a theory or principles of justice and the desired result according to that theory or those principles of justice. The scope of justice measures how broadly the principle or theory of justice is intended to apply. The depth of justice measures the gap between existing social norms and the theory or principles of justice we examine within the specified scope. This three-dimensional model explains public policies, laws, and regulations that increase the scope or depth of justice at the cost of a decrease in its accuracy -- rough forms of justice such as measures of transitional justice, affirmative action, mandatory sentencing, simplified tax codes, collective guilt and victimhood, and general amnesties. The scarcity of resources necessary for justice can contract or expand. The normative choice between principles of justice that prefer accuracy and those that favor scope or depth usually corresponds, respectively, with rights-based deontological theories and consequentialist ethics. [Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications Ltd., copyright holder.]
In: The independent review: journal of political economy, Band 17, Heft 1, S. 99-119
ISSN: 1086-1653
In: Politics, philosophy & economics: ppe, Band 11, Heft 1, S. 76-96
ISSN: 1741-3060
The scarcity of resources required to produce justice is manifested in the relation between the accuracy, depth, and scope of materially possible forms of justice. Ceteris paribus, increases in the accuracy of justice must come at the expense of its depth and scope, and vice versa, though they are not linearly proportioned. The accuracy of justice is the degree of agreement between the possible results of attempts to implement a theory or principles of justice and the desired result according to that theory or those principles of justice. The scope of justice measures how broadly the principle or theory of justice is intended to apply. The depth of justice measures the gap between existing social norms and the theory or principles of justice we examine within the specified scope. This three-dimensional model explains public policies, laws, and regulations that increase the scope or depth of justice at the cost of a decrease in its accuracy – rough forms of justice such as measures of transitional justice, affirmative action, mandatory sentencing, simplified tax codes, collective guilt and victimhood, and general amnesties. The scarcity of resources necessary for justice can contract or expand. The normative choice between principles of justice that prefer accuracy and those that favor scope or depth usually corresponds, respectively, with rights-based deontological theories and consequentialist ethics.
In: Angelaki: journal of the theoretical humanities, Band 15, Heft 3, S. 139-152
ISSN: 1469-2899