Realism and Neo-realism
In: Theories of International Relations, S. 67-92
1592 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Theories of International Relations, S. 67-92
In: Representation and mind
In: Representation and mind
In: Synthese: an international journal for epistemology, methodology and philosophy of science, Band 85, Heft 1, S. 115-138
ISSN: 1573-0964
In: Synthese: an international journal for epistemology, methodology and philosophy of science, Band 73, Heft 2, S. 275-299
ISSN: 1573-0964
In: Synthese: an international journal for epistemology, methodology and philosophy of science, Band 52, Heft 1, S. 55-112
ISSN: 1573-0964
In: Foreign affairs, Band 76, Heft 4, S. 147
ISSN: 0015-7120
'Roots of Realism' edited by Benjamin Frankel and 'Realism: Restatements and Renewal' edited by Benjamin Frankel are reviewed. A review is presented of two books edited by Benjamin Frankel: 1. Roots of Realism and 2. Realism: Restatements and Renewal.
In: Science & society: a journal of Marxist thought and analysis, Band 57, Heft 2, S. 160
ISSN: 0036-8237
In: Review of international studies: RIS, Band 16, Heft 3, S. 223
ISSN: 0260-2105
In: Science & society: a journal of Marxist thought and analysis, Band 53, Heft Winter 89-90
ISSN: 0036-8237
In: Science & society: a journal of Marxist thought and analysis, Band 53, Heft 4, S. 459
ISSN: 0036-8237
In: History of political thought, Band 12, Heft 1, S. 107
ISSN: 0143-781X
In: International organization, Band 51, Heft 3, S. 445-477
ISSN: 1531-5088
International relations scholars have tended to focus on realism's common features rather than exploring potential differences. Realists do share certain assumptions and are often treated as a group, but such a broad grouping obscures systematic divisions within realist theory. Recently, some analysts have argued that it is necessary to differentiate within realism. This article builds on this line of argument. The potential, and need, to divide realism on the basis of divergent assumptions has so far been overlooked. In this article I argue that realism can be split into two competing branches by revealing latent divisions regarding a series of assumptions about state behavior. The first branch is Kenneth Waltz's well-known neorealist theory; a second branch, termed here "postclassical realism," has yet to be delineated as a major alternative but corresponds with a number of realist analyses that cohere with one another and are incompatible with Waltzian neorealism.
In: The review of politics, Band 47, Heft 2, S. 212
ISSN: 0034-6705
In: The review of politics, Band 47, Heft 2, S. 212-230
ISSN: 1748-6858
Declaring his departure from the modes and orders of his predecessors— especially the creators of imaginary republics and principalities (men like Plato, Aristotle and Augustine) — Machiavelli undertakes to show "whoever understands" a new and more promising road to political salvation and personal well-being. So compelling is Machiavelli's rhetoric that we seem to have forgotten just how "realistic" or "moderate" Machiavelli's predecessors we're, and how "unrealistic" or "immoderate" Machiavelli's own teaching is. This essay attempts to bring to light the extremism which underlies Machiavelli's realism and raises doubts about his ability to provide his readers the security he promises.