Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
53955 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
SSRN
Working paper
In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics
"Strategic Voting Versus Sincere Voting" published on by Oxford University Press.
I conduct an axiomatic analysis of voting rules in a context where voters evaluate each candidate by assigning her an evaluation from a pre-established set. I focus on additive rules, which follow the utilitarian paradigm. Characterization results are provided for each of the two prominent additive rules: Evaluative Voting when the evaluation set is finite and Range Voting when the evaluation set is [0,1].
BASE
In: Hofstra Univ. Legal Studies Research Paper
SSRN
Conventional democratic institutions aggregate preferences poorly. The norm of one-person-one-vote with majority rule treats people fairly by giving everyone an equal chance to influence outcomes but fails to give proportional weight to people whose interests in a social outcome are stronger than those of other people. This problem leads to the familiar phenomenon of tyranny of the majority. Various institutions that have been tried or proposed over the years to correct this problem-including supermajority rule, weighted voting, cumulative voting, "mixed constitutions," executive discretion, and judicially protected rights-all badly misfire in various ways, for example, by creating gridlock or corruption. This Article proposes a new form of political decisionmaking based on the theory of quadratic voting. It explains how quadratic voting solves the preference-aggregation problem by giving proper weight to preferences of varying intensity, how it can be incorporated into political institutions, and why it should improve equity.
BASE
In: The public opinion quarterly: POQ, Band 68, Heft 1, S. 102-108
ISSN: 1537-5331
In: Polish political science review: Polski przeglad politologiczny, Band 8, Heft 1, S. 87-99
ISSN: 2353-3773
Abstract
Populist, especially far-right populist, parties have gained votes in recent elections across Europe recently. This observation is true for Poland as well. The far-right populist party Law and Justice (PiS, Prawo i Sprawiedliwość) won the parliamentary election in 2015. Next to the well-known nativist and populist messages, PiS promoted a social policy: the Family 500+ programme. Did this programme attract voters? The findings of this study lend reason to answer the question in the affirmative. The inclusion of social policies usually associated with left-wing parties might hence be a path to be explored by other far-right populist parties as well.
In: Parliamentary journal, Band 40, Heft 2, S. 70-77
ISSN: 0048-2994
In: Mathematical social sciences, Band 7, Heft 3, S. 294-295
In: Beyond the Founders, S. 57-78
In: Public choice, Band 127, Heft 3-4, S. 285-303
ISSN: 1573-7101
In: Public choice, Band 127, Heft 3, S. 285-304
ISSN: 0048-5829