The Implementation of Public International Law in India
In: Jadavpur journal of international relations: JNR, Volume 6, Issue 1, p. 181-201
ISSN: 2349-0047
2141356 results
Sort by:
In: Jadavpur journal of international relations: JNR, Volume 6, Issue 1, p. 181-201
ISSN: 2349-0047
In: International journal on world peace, Volume 19, Issue 3, p. 100-102
ISSN: 0742-3640
In: International studies review, Volume 4, Issue 1, p. 219-223
ISSN: 1521-9488
In: International studies review, Volume 3, Issue 3, p. 53-73
ISSN: 1468-2486
In: Naval forces: international forum for maritime power, Volume 21, Issue 1, p. 8-9
ISSN: 0722-8880
In: Review of International Studies, Volume 24, Issue 3, p. 321-330
In: Australian Year Book of International Law, Volume 19
In: The International trade journal, Volume 10, Issue 1, p. 21-47
ISSN: 1521-0545
In: Studia diplomatica: Brussels journal of international relations, Volume 49, Issue 4-5, p. 3-4
ISSN: 0770-2965
In: Jadavpur journal of international relations: JNR, Volume 1, Issue 1, p. 51-63
ISSN: 2349-0047
In: Studia diplomatica: Brussels journal of international relations, Volume 40, Issue 6, p. 669-673
ISSN: 0770-2965
World Affairs Online
In: International journal of forecasting, Volume 3, Issue 2, p. 342-343
ISSN: 0169-2070
In: Netherlands yearbook of international law: NYIL, Volume 15, p. 97-138
ISSN: 1574-0951
In any field of legal study, there are certain terms which, while not corresponding to distinct fundamental concepts, come to acquire currency as regular symbols or building-blocks in legal argument, either through their inclusion in some key text, or through being recognised as convenient encapsulation of a bundle of concepts or conditions. The generally well-recognised danger in the use of such symbolic notation is that the term in question may come to be used with insufficient regard to the nucleus of ideas which existed before it was affixed as a label, and the manipulation of which it was merely intended to facilitate. Furthermore, what may be called the "common" meaning of the term in question – the meaning it has in a non-legal or non-specialist dictionary – may exercise a surreptitious influence, causing the legal meaning of the term to drift in a manner unjustified by legal considerations. For these reasons, such terms need to be scrutinised from time to time in the light of their origin and background, in order that such drifts may be detected, and the danger avoided of legal exactitude being prejudiced by linguistic convenience.
In: India International Centre quarterly, Volume 11, Issue 3, p. 271-286
ISSN: 0376-9771
In: Netherlands yearbook of international law: NYIL, Volume 3, p. 142-147
ISSN: 1574-0951