Studying first-strike stability with knowledge-based models of human decision making
In: [Report] R-3689-CC
In: Rand library collection
433058 results
Sort by:
In: [Report] R-3689-CC
In: Rand library collection
In: JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, Volume 57, Issue 4, p. 692-709
SSRN
In: Review of Constitutional Studies, Volume 18, Issue 1
SSRN
In: Law & policy, Volume 16, Issue 3, p. 341
ISSN: 0265-8240
In: IHS Working Paper, Volume 6
Artificial intelligence is at the heart of current debates related to ethical, social and political issues of technological innovation. This briefing refocuses attention from the techno-ethical challenges of AI to artificial decision-making (ADM) and the questions related to delegating human decisions to ADM. It is argued that (a) from a socio-ethical point of view the delegation is more relevant than the actual ethical problems of AI systems; (b) instead of traditional responsible AI approaches focusing on accountability, responsibility and transparency (ART) we should direct our attention to trustworthiness in the delegation process; and (c) trustworthiness as a socio-communicational challenge leads to questions that may be guided by a responsible research and innovation framework of anticipation, reflexivity, inclusion, and responsiveness. This may lead to different questions policymakers and other interested publics may ask as well as novel approaches, including regulatory sandboxes and other measures to foster a more inclusive, open and democratic culture of human-ADM relations.
In: Edward Elgar E-Book Archive
Beyond Conventional Economics presents new original work from leading scholars on the interface between the individual and political and social institutions. The book offers a critique of the inadequacies of the conventional economic approach to politics and a state-of-the-art view of new paradigms challenging the dominant economic notion of the individual. A number of chapters also explore the limits of individually rational behaviour in political decision making--some by challenging the orthodox content of the idea of rationality, others by providing fresh views on the operation of political processes
SSRN
The field of Public Policy and Administration is heavily influenced by the decisions individuals make regarding matters of governance. These types of decisions can affect a broad scope of government-related activities ranging from esoteric debates about political ideology to policy development to specific ways in which people directly interact with public services. Unfortunately, in the view of this research, there is no sufficient model for conceptualizing governance decision making. This creates the focus of inquiry for this work, which is to examine how governance decisions are conceived of and formulated. The purpose of this research is then to analyze the governance decision making processes. This is achieved by examining the available research on decision making processes and then contrasting the widely applied rational approaches with the more applicable nonrational approaches for decision making. This review will indicate that a nonrational conceptualization based on schemas, heuristics, and a societal-level shared mental model may be more instrumental in analyzing governance decisions than rational conceptualizations. The unique but necessary methodological approach of abductive logic is used to develop a theoretical foundation for this new perspective. An application of abductive principles is used to create a framework that anchors governance decisions. The result of these efforts is a model that can serve as a tool for analysis of these important and influential decisions in governance.
BASE
In: Child abuse & neglect: the international journal ; official journal of the International Society for the Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect, Volume 34, Issue 1, p. 57-69
ISSN: 1873-7757
SSRN
Working paper
In: International journal of urban and regional research, Volume 37, Issue 6, p. 1984-2000
ISSN: 1468-2427
In: Journal of political marketing: political campaigns in the new millennium, Volume 8, Issue 2, p. 130-146
ISSN: 1537-7865
Investing In Financial Research is a guidebook for conducting financial investigations. The book lays out the AREA Method -- a research and decision-making system that uniquely controls for bias, focuses on the incentives of others and expands knowledge while improving judgement -- and applies it to all sorts of financial sleuthing from investment analysis to investigative journalism. The AREA Method provides defined tasks that guide and focus research on a vision of success; a structure that isolates sources, giving insight into their perspectives, biases and incentives; investigative resources, tips and techniques to upgrade research and analysis beyond document-based sources; exercises to foster creativity and originality in thinking; and a sequence and framework that brings disparate pieces of research together to build confidence and conviction about financial decisions.