Search results

This paper show why the standardization of administrative procedure is important for the state legal system that, in the last two decades, the administrative procedure codes were adopted in almost all of the European states. Afterwards author analyzed main driving forces for development of administrative procedural law at the level of the European Union and the Council of Europe. The most important legal sources of European administrative procedural law (basic standards, principles, recommendations and guidelines in this area) are concisely presented but it is clearly indicated that there are certain ambiguities, that these sources don't apply equally to all institutions of the Union, and that they still don't make finished, complete and forever given system that can be automatically transferred to jurisprudence of the member states and candidate countries. Moreover, often administrative process laws of the member states contain rules that are not existing in this kind of regulation at European Union level and that is why the process of adopting the first European Union general law on administrative procedure was initiated, which would further improve the standards of European administrative process in general. When it comes to the general administrative procedure of the Republic of Serbia it has been shown that in spite of the strategic orientation towards the reform of the Law on Administrative Procedure expressed in numerous strategies, our executive authorities in this area have not yet moved beyond the development of the third version of the Draft Law on General administrative Procedure which was afterward adopted by the Government as the Bill. In his final remarks the author concludes stating that the largest number of European standards of administrative process are included in the final version of the Draft, but without eliminating the shortcomings of the existing Law, and without normative adjusting to the circumstances in which the Serbian administration operates, and with unnecessary abandonment of some solutions that have proved to be right in the decades-long practice of administrative authorities.

La tesi affronta il tema dell'abuso del processo all'interno del sistema penale italiano, tentando una ricostruzione che, muovendo dal piano interno, adotta come ulteriori punti di riferimento l'indagine comparatistica (in particolare, diretta verso il sistema anglosassone) e l'analisi sintetica della nozione di Abuse of Right a livello sovranazionale (più nello specifico, con riguardo alla Convenzione europea dei diritti dell'uomo e delle libertà fondamentali e alla Carta dei diritti fondamentali dell'Unione europea). Da una ricognizione dello scenario maturato nel sistema interno, si tenta di tracciare una delimitazione dei connotati della categoria dogmatica in oggetto (attraverso l'analisi, in particolare, della pronuncia della Suprema Corte (Sez. un., 29 settembre 2011 (dep. 10.1.2012) n. 155, Rossi). Si prosegue con lo studio comparatistico: il sistema preso a modello è quello anglo-gallese, con uno studio diretto ad evidenziare punti di divergenza e, al contempo, l'esistenza di tratti comuni che possano consentire un'eventuale mutuazione delle soluzioni adottate in quella sede. Si procede con la ricognizione del panorama normativo ed interpretativo sovranazionale in materia: i summenzionati testi legislativi rendono contezza del radicamento di tale categoria anche a tale livello, palesando concretamente l'idea della necessità di un adeguamento interno in materia. Le riflessioni finali convergono in una critica delle impostazioni giurisprudenziali emerse nell'ordinamento italiano e dei limiti dell'inquadramento offerto, nonché dell'incapacità della categoria dogmatica così elaborata di offrire adeguate soluzioni ai reali generati dall'abuso del processo; donde la necessità di pervenire alla prospettazione di un diverso paradigma della nozione, secondo una ricostruzione che, pur non negando l'essenzialità del principio di stretta legalità in ambito processuale, ne concepirebbe un temperamento, con l'ipotesi di una elaborazione per via interpretativa di una clausola generale di divieto di abuso, diretta ad offrire una risposta sia agli eventuali comportamenti scorretti dell'accusa (capaci di minare alla radice le garanzie della difesa), sia a quelli dell'imputato. ; The thesis faces the topic of the abuse of process within the Italian criminal system, through an analysis which, moving from the national view, adopts as further points of reference the comparative research (particularly, focused on the England and Wales legal system) and the synthetic analysis of the notion of Abuse of Right on to international level (more in the specific one, with respect to the European Convention of the Human Rights and the Fundamental Chart of Human Rights). From a recognition of the scenario, matured in the italian system, I attempt to trace a delimitation of the essential elements of the dogmatic category (through the analysis, particularly, of the pronunciation of the Supreme Court (Sez. Un., September 29 th 2011, Rossi). The research keeps on with the comparative perspective: I focus the England and Wales system, with a study aimed at highlighting points of divergence and, at the same time, the existence of common traits that may allow to mutuate solutions adopted in that headquarters. Therefore, I conduct a recognition of the international legal scenario and interpretative panorama on the subject is made. Final reflections converge in a critique of the jurisprudence made in Italian law and of the limits of the framing offered, as well as of the inability of the dogmatic category so elaborated to offer appropriate solutions to the real problems generated by the abuse of process and, perhaps, the necessity to come up with the prospect of a different paradigm of the notion, according to a reconstruction that, while not denying the essence of the principle of strict legality in a procedural context, would conceive of a temperament of it, intended to offer an answer to any untrue behavior of the prosecution (capable of undermining the defense's defense), as well as those of the defendant.

In this paper, the author points to the outdated textbook classification of states into three groups, according to whether they have carried out the codification of administrative procedure or not. The first group includes the states that have administrative procedures fully codified. The second group comprises the states with the so-called mixed systems, which have uncodified procedural regulations related to the administration, while the third group contains a few states that do not have administrative procedural regulations at all. The author analyzes recent changes in this highly dynamic field in order to specify general patterns, common characteristics and peculiarities of regulations of general administrative procedure in contemporary states. The paper especially points to the general acceptance of the concept of administrative act but also underscores the differences in its content in various legal systems. The author has identified and analyzed some smaller standalone trends, such as: the increasing complexity of administrative procedures along the lines of judicial procedures, and the most recent deviations from this trend; the increasing presence of administrative contracting and other forms of alternative dispute resolutions of administrative matters; and the growing insistence on the principle of citizens' participation in administrative proceedings. The goal of the analysis is to determine the degree of influence of the Global and European administrative law on the national regulations, to explore the activities of certain expert organizations bringing together a number of experts in the field of comparative administrative law, and to discuss the course of the latest regulations in this area.

A decade ago, Serbia has carried out the reform of judicial control of public administration - by establishing the new Administrative Court. The expected results, however, have not been achieved and the problems that caused the reform have not been resolved. Therefore, a decade later, a new reform is in sight. The planned changes include establishing more administrative courts and introducing a two-instance administrative dispute. The aim of this paper is to discuss these changes, but in a slightly different way. Instead of their uncritical acceptance and justification by European legal standards, they are analysed having in mind the legal nature of the administrative dispute. Successful administrative dispute reform cannot be achieved if European legal standards are blindly accepted and copied literally from classical court proceedings. Only the legal nature of the administrative dispute and the features that make it special and different from the usual court disputes can lead us to a successful implementation of the changes.

This article focuses on administrative reforms in two countries of the Western Balkans – Croatia and Serbia – within the context of democratization and Europeanization processes. It explores, in particular, the administrative simplification measurdes and regulatory reforms that have been undertaken by the two countries in order to reduce administrative burdens on both businesses and citizens, and improve public governance and regulatory quality. In this article, particular attention is given to the progress reached by Croatia and Serbia in establishing the one stop shop principle and e-Government services. The main aim of the article is to verify the impact of the EU integration on administrative simplification measures, especially in the areas of administrative procedure and relationships between public administration and citizens.

Along several legislative interventions, following the Covid-19 pandemic, simplification Decrees (i.e. Decreto Semplificazioni and Semplificazioni bis) have made even permanent changes to the law on administrative procedure, law no. 241/1990, intervening in the public-private relationship, constantly evolving. Observing the articles of the law concerned by the reforms, attention is focused on the persistent decisory self-protection recognized to the public administration even in the emergency, proof of the inexhaustibility of administrative power. The need to achieve the public interest, even in the contemporary crisis of state sovereignty, is inevitably based on the principle of legality, which becomes more properly in "legality-justice". ; Tra i numerosi interventi legislativi, a seguito della pandemia da Covid-19, rilevano i decreti-semplificazione che hanno apportato modifiche anche permanenti alla legge sul procedimento amministrativo, l. n. 241/1990, intervenendo nel rapporto pubblica amministrazione-privato, in costante evoluzione. Ripercorrendo gli articoli della legge interessati dalle riforme, viene focalizzata l'attenzione sulla persistente autotutela decisoria riconosciuta alla pubblica amministrazione anche nella situazione emergenziale, prova dell'inesauribilità del potere amministrativo. La necessità di perseguire l'interesse pubblico, anche nella contemporanea crisi della sovranità statale, trova fondamento inevitabilmente sul principio di legalità, che declina più propriamente nella "legalità-giustizia".

At the end of 2012 and the beginning of 2013, the Serbian Government issued the new national regulations in order to provide an acceptable legislation framework to achieve 2020 targets of 27% increase of total renewable energy sources share in the gross final energy consumption, relative to 2009. The target of a 37% increase relates to participation of renewable energy sources in electricity production. It requires construction of new significant capacities of renewable energy power plants as clearly defined in the National Action Plan for Renewable Energy Sources.This paper comprises critical analyses of targeted new installed capacity of renewable energy power plants for electricity production from different point of views, such as: new national energy policy, new national regulations, renewable energy sources potential in Serbia, efficiency of power plants and the investment financial models.According to the new national energy policy identified in the National Action Plan for Renewable Energy Sources, it is concluded that the new regulations related to the construction of new renewable energy power plants is completed, particularly concerning the investment security, provision of green electricity market, status of green electricity producer, and significant reduction of time for administrative procedures required to obtain a building permit. Particularly, the real wind potential in Serbia, based on the measured data over the past ten years of measurement campaigns at more than thirty locations, has been used to correct the targeted installed capacity of wind power plants. ; At the end of 2012 and the beginning of 2013, the Serbian Government issued the new national regulations in order to provide an acceptable legislation framework to achieve 2020 targets of 27% increase of total renewable energy sources share in the gross final energy consumption, relative to 2009. The target of a 37% increase relates to participation of renewable energy sources in electricity production. It requires construction of new significant capacities of renewable energy power plants as clearly defined in the National Action Plan for Renewable Energy Sources.This paper comprises critical analyses of targeted new installed capacity of renewable energy power plants for electricity production from different point of views, such as: new national energy policy, new national regulations, renewable energy sources potential in Serbia, efficiency of power plants and the investment financial models.According to the new national energy policy identified in the National Action Plan for Renewable Energy Sources, it is concluded that the new regulations related to the construction of new renewable energy power plants is completed, particularly concerning the investment security, provision of green electricity market, status of green electricity producer, and significant reduction of time for administrative procedures required to obtain a building permit. Particularly, the real wind potential in Serbia, based on the measured data over the past ten years of measurement campaigns at more than thirty locations, has been used to correct the targeted installed capacity of wind power plants.

In modern realities the study of the processual form of administrative proceedings under quarantine caused by COVID-19 is important due to the increased need to protect the rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of individuals. The purpose of the study is to analyze the modern processual form of administrative proceedings and the compliance of law modifications with the quarantine conditions caused by COVID-19. The methodological basis of the study represents a set of updated methods of scientific research. The use of formal-logical and structural-functional methods allowed to highlight the elements of the processual form of administrative proceedings and to characterize the main aspects of their transformation, including processing in the quarantine period and restrictions caused by COVID-19. It is of interest to analyze the introduction of an electronic court, electronic exchange of processual documents, as well as participation in court sessions in the mode of the videoconference. With the help of the modeling method the disadvantages and risks of taking part in court sessions in the mode of the videoconference are highlighted. System analysis contributed to the consideration of the processual form as the most distinctive feature of administrative proceedings. The study revealed that the processual form of administrative proceedings had undergone particular fragmentary changes due to the test launch of individual subsystems of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System (UJITS) (as example: "E-Court") and the introduction of taking part in court sessions in the mode of the videoconference. It has been found that in the present realities, the processual form of administrative court proceedings needs further modifications aimed at ensuring the flexibility and a high degree of adaptability of legislative assistance to new conditions of implementation, allowing to guarantee the observance and protection of the rights, freedoms and interests of citizens whenever previously used methods and ...

L'effettività della tutela cautelare, intesa come tutela tempestiva, adeguata e piena, è stata la linea cardine dell'evoluzione della giustizia amministrativa, che, nel corso di un periodo durato più di un secolo, grazie all'opera della giurisprudenza e della dottrina, si è strutturata oggi su un vero processo. Approdo recente, e allo stesso tempo, simbolo di questa evoluzione, è sicuramente il Codice del processo amministrativo emanato con il d. lgs. 2 luglio 2010, n. 104. La ricerca, di cui questo contributo costituisce un resoconto, è iniziata contestualmente all'entrata in vigore del nuovo testo, e quindi è stata anche l'occasione per vederne le prime applicazioni giurisprudenziali. In particolare la lettura del Codice, prescindendo da una mera ricognizione di tutto il suo lungo articolato, è stata fatta alla luce di una ponderazione, nell'attualità, non solo del principio di effettività, ma anche del principio di strumentalità che lega tradizionalmente la fase cautelare con la fase di merito. I risultati della ricerca manifestano la volontà del legislatore di confermare questo rapporto strumentale, per fronteggiare una deriva incontrollata verso una cautela dagli effetti alle volte irreversibili, quale verificatasi nell'applicazione giurisprudenziale, ma contestualmente evidenziano la volontà di estendere la portata della tutela cautelare. Guardando a cosa sia diventata oggi la tutela cautelare, si è assistito ad un rafforzamento degli effetti conformativi, tipici delle sentenze di merito ma che si sono estesi alla fase cautelare. I giudici, pur consapevoli che la tutela cautelare non sia una risposta a cognizione piena, bensì sommaria, intendono comunque garantire una tutela tempestiva ed effettiva, anche per il tramite di tecniche processuali particolari, come quella del remand, cui, all'interno della ricerca, viene dedicato ampio spazio. Nella sua ultima parte la ricerca si è focalizzata, sempre volendo guardare in maniera globale agli effetti della tutela cautelare, sul momento dell'esecuzione e quindi sul giudizio di ottemperanza. ; During more than a century, the core of administrative justice evolution was the effectiveness of interim legal protection, that is a protection timely adequate and full. Thanks to case law and doctrine contribution, it is now structured on a complete judicial proceeding. Issued by legislative decree no. 104 of 2010, the Code of Administrative Proceeding is symbolic of this evolution (from now on, the Code). The present research begun at the time when the Code entered into force. For this reason, it is an opportunity to examine its first judicial application. In particular, the study of the Code aimed to an evaluation in the light of principle of effectiveness and the principle of instrumentality. The latter bounds traditionally interim protection with the judgment not only in the administrative actions but in any type of actions. The results show, on the one hand, a legislative confirmation of this instrumental relationship, in order to face uncontrolled drifts towards irreversible effects of interim protection, as partially noticed in case law, on the other, a desire to extend the scope of protection pending trial. In order to point out what the interim protection has become today, it is necessary to consider concrete effects of such measures on an application level. In that regard, binding effects have been strengthened along with suspension effects or not. Binding effects towards administrative decisions, typical of annulment actions, are now extended to a pre-trial moment . Judges are aware though that interim protection is not a full knowledge solution. However, they intend to ensure a timely and effective protection, even by peculiar technical proceedings such as remand, deeply analysed during the research. Finally, the last part of the present research focused on execution and compliance, still in the light of the effects of interim protection.

Preliminary Materials /I. De Gennaro and H.-Chr. Günther -- Chapter One. Introduction /H.-C. Günther -- Chapter Two. Josef Liegle (1893-1945) /A. Kerkhecker -- Chapter Three. Heidegger And Politics /F. Fédier -- Chapter Four. Sartre Und Die Macht /W. Biemel -- Chapter Five. "Lektüre" Als Machtrelevante Wahrnehmungsanalyse Bei Simone Weil /R. Kühn -- Chapter Six. Philosophers In Japan In The Period Of World War II—Reflecting The Philosophy Of Nishida Against The Background Of Social Phenomena /Hisaki Hashi -- Chapter Seven. Mao Und Die Intellektuellen /Harro Von Senger -- Chapter Eight. Hans Pfitzner – Ein Genie Und Sein Verhältnis Zur Gesellschaft /J. P. Vogel -- Chapter Nine. Abstract Musical Works As Objects Of Political Interest? The Example Of Schönberg's Op. 11,1 /H. Eiholzer -- Chapter Ten. La Poesia Politica Degli Augustei /P. Fedeli -- Chapter Eleven. Political Analysis In Horace'S Roman Odes /T. Reinhardt -- Chapter Twelve. Stalin, Putin And The Poets /D. Rayfield -- Chapter Thirteen. Nationale Dichtung Im 20. Jh.: Der Griechische Dichter Und Politiker Giorgos Seferis /H.-C. Günther -- Notes On Contributors /I. De Gennaro and H.-Chr. Günther -- Index /I. De Gennaro and H.-Chr. Günther.