Search results

More often than not, the State did not acknowledge the matrimonial norms as settled by the Church. This relation seems to have altered towards the end of the 19th century, when the State succeeded in imposing on the Church the respect for the general civil framework. Yet, the change was not radical. The Church and the State were still pretty connected. The State acknowledged the Church's right to be in charge with officiating marriages, with bed and home separation according to the requirements of each confession. However, the State had the right to supervise the civil and military status, the relationship between the spouses, legacy, legal guardianship, the issue of supporting children and spouses and many others. The Church admitted the involvement of the State in major demographic issues in an individual's life.
As time went by, the State became more and more complex while its legislation became ever more "lay". It is true that willy-nilly lay legislation borrowed norms and regulations belonging to Church's legislation. The frail State – Church dualism on family law was influenced by lay laws enforcing the lay legitimacy of important moments in man's life. Matrimonial laws as set out in 1894 were the most complex laws in the 19th century. Due to their clarity, they managed to put an end to misunderstandings between lay and Church authorities. Moreover, the matrimonial issues between different confessions were in favour of the State. Civil law very clearly favoured family and children's interests. They were all conceived to better supervise individual's education in a moral family where the Church would still have an influence.

The family, its formation, the relationships between man, woman, children and relatives, as well as the relationships with the rest of the community were filtered by the "village gossip". The need for a strong solidarity that was necessary in the unfriendly conditions at the time compelled the individuals to accept the cohabitation with other members of the family (including the extended one) and with the rest of the community. More often than not, the individual behaviour acquired the expression of the collective behaviour. Such an influence of the community was obvious in the traditional rural societies. However, in time, it became progressively diluted under the pressure of modernity.
We can see that there were deep changes as the area integrated to an economic circuit that would lead to imposing new mutations in several economic sectors. The economic development and the dissemination of non-agricultural activities associated to urban development whose influence went growing brought about alterations in the family relations. Then, there were mutations in the relationship between the family, the domestic group and the household resources. These changes were not obvious in all localities in the region: some of them were still anchored in the traditional as the new managed to penetrate more difficultly, while major changes on the level of the collective mental could not be perceived on a short span of time. Nevertheless, under the influence of modernity, society influenced the family not only in point of form, but also insofar as its role and functions were concerned. Mentalities changed together with the form and nature of society. Family was no longer big; it did no longer accept the interference of the relatives and even less that of the community. Changes were more visible in the city; however, once the social, cultural and economic changes, they became obvious in the countryside too. The nuclear family was the new family model where interference from the outside was insignificant.

Revista Transilvania - serie nouă, anul XLV (CXLIX), nr. 6, 2017; Colegiul științific: prof.univ.dr. Ștefan AFLOROAIEI; prof.univ.dr. Sabin Adrian LUCA; prof.univ.dr. Peter KOPECKÝ; acad.prof.univ.dr. Alexandru MOȘANU; acad.pr.prof.univ.dr. Mircea PĂCURARIU; acad.prof.univ.dr. Ioan-Aurel POP; prof.univ.dr. Ștefan SIENERTH; prof.univ.dr.habil. Andrei TERIAN; acad.prof.univ.dr. Alexandru ZUB. Colegiul consultativ: Î.P.S.prof.univ.dr. Laurențiu STREZA; prof.univ.dr. Pamfil MATEI; prof.univ.dr. Zeno PINTER. Redactor șef: Radu VANCU; Redactor: Dragoș VARGA ; Revista Transilvania nr. 6, 2017 cuprinde următoarele articole: Vancu, Radu. Despre instituții & continuități. Lecțiile lui H.-R. Patapievici & Mircea Cărtărescu. Sau despre atenția la celălalt ca mod de construcție instituțională; / Mitchievici, Angelo. Traian Demetrescu - gestul estetic; / Ignat, Mihai. Onomastica în romanele lui Stefan Agopian; / Olaru, Ovio. Douămiismul poetic românesc. Condițiile unei schimbări de paradigmă; / Vancea, Mihaela. Proza douămiistă - detabuizarea cuplului homosexual; / Chioaru, Dumitru. (In)actualitatea teoriei blagiene a influenţelor; / Baghiu, Ștefan. Figura boemei la Pierre Bourdieu: câmpul literar modern; David, Maria Tereza. Franco Moretti – despre supraviețuirea literară. Analiză și explorare; / Berechet, Lăcrămioara. Noaptea de Sânziene. Locuirea sacrului în hermeneutica recuperatoare; / Stan, Adriana. Piramidele se construiesc altfel decât miturile. Mihai Pop și reinventarea studiilor de folclor; / Galter, Sunhild. Das siebenbürgische Dorf in der Perspektive von Rolf Bauerdicks Roman Wie die Madonna auf den Mond kam; / Muntean Beșliu, Petre. The archaeology of the medieval towers in Mount Athos. An attempt of archaeological research; / Gîță, Elena Iulia. Cultural Translation Enabling a Dialogue between West and East; / Manolache, Viorella. Making sense of Jürgen Habermas: Politica scurtelor introduceri filosofice; / Andrei, Olivia. Chestionarea ca proces cognitiv: ilustrarea în Viața mea a lui Charles Darwin și implicațiile sale în educația modernă; / Ilea, Mihaela. Televiziunea – între jurnalismul de informare și cel de comunicare; / Sălcudean, Minodora. Children and Public Street Protests – a Public Debate of Striking Immediacy in Romania. The Social Media and the Mass-media as Main Vectors to shape up the Dominant Threads of Opinion;

The paper presents the theories of 195 great specialists in the field of organizations, the selection being made according to several criteria: originality of ideas and style, academic recognition and applicability. They are sociologists, psychologists, economists, management experts, engineers, philosophers, political scientists, historians, journalists, lawyers, but all have enjoyed a professional fame that has crossed the borders of their country. Their multiple specializations have enriched the field of organizations, and the dynamic, high, engaging style has made them enter global university circuits. Managers understood thanks to them that for the development of their institutions they have to work closely with specialists to increase their visibility, to impose a good strategy and for the well-being of themselves, employees and society.

The article explores the way political participation, representation and governance
are conceptualized and rationalized by the Romanian legislation on parties. The
plurality of parties was initially set up as a way to discipline and organize the
political pluralism manifest in society in order to contain it within the boundaries
imposed by the Constitution. This disciplinary vocation of parties was confirmed
and reinforced by the laws enacted in 1996 and 2003 that embedded parties into
a functional vision of democracy where they were explicitly endowed with
the public mission of ensuring the political integration of Romanian citizens.
The detailed rationalization of parties' mission to organize citizens' political
participation and to contain the expression of their political will contrasted
sharply with both the ambiguity of their governmental role within the "eclectic"
institutional design of the Constitution, and with their organizational friability.