The main aim of the article is to present the discourse around the possibility of regulating the sharing economy and to discuss potential instruments of public policy that may be used to limit the adverse effects of the development of this economic system. The contribution first introduces the understanding of the concept of regulation and régulation and discusses the relationship between the sharing economy and the concept of digital governance. Then, after presenting selected positive and negative effects of the sharing economy, regulatory instruments are identified. The summary indicates possible directions for further research.
SSCB'nin dağılmasından sonra uluslararası sisteme entegre olma girişimlerinin sürdüğü Kafkasya ve Türkistan1 ülkeleri dünya siyasasında jeo-stratejik açıdan önemli bir konuma sahiptir. Bu bölgelerde yeni bağımsız devletlerin kurulmasıyla, daha önce kapalı alanda dikkat çekmeyen birçok konu, bu kez sorun olarak ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu sorunlardan biri ve en önemlisi de bölgedeki enerji kaynaklarının ve askeri bakımdan stratejik merkezlerin paylaşımıdır. Bu çalışmamızda tarihsel zemine dayalı olarak, söz konusu bölgelerdeki muhtelif sorunları ele aldık. Çünkü, bu bölgelerde tarihçilerin geleneksel ilgilerine yakın olan sorunlar demeti bulunmaktadır. Kafkasya ve Türkistan devletlerinin eskiden SSCB'ye bağımlı olmaları konunun karmaşıklığını iyice artırmaktadır. Günümüzde Rusya'nın yakın çevre doktriniyle, ABD'nin büyük oyun stratejisi, araştırmamızda öne çıkan kavramlardır. Bu araştırma bizi Avrasya tarihine biraz olsun yaklaştırmıştır. ; Caucasus and Turkestan countries trying to inegrate into international system after the demise of Soviet Union have very important geo-strategic role in the world policy. A lot of subjects that didn't draw attention at that close area has became a problem after the establishment of new independent states. The most important one of these problems is sharing the strategical military regions and energy sources. In this essay we have analyzed these problems according to the historical perspective. Because, there are a bunch of problems which are close to historians traditional interests. The dependency of the Caucasus and Turkestan countries to Soviet Union in the near history is increasing the complexity of the issues. Russia's vicinity doctrine and USA's big game strategy are prominent concepts of our essay. This study promises us to get a bit more closer to Eurasian history.
A rational economic person desires to achieve happiness by acting for his or her own benefit. Therefore, the key of human happiness is in the sense of pleasure and satisfaction. The concept of happiness, which has been emphasized more over time, has also started to be discussed frequently in economic terms. The economics of happiness at the focus of these discussions was built on an economy model based on society and nature. It is possible to mention many socioeconomic factors that add value to life and create happiness. Factors such as a clean environment, a good income level, relationships based on trust, healthy and quality life can be described as the causes of happiness. Today, a new social process is mentioned and happiness takes attention as well as technological developments in this society. This study has aimed to investigate the factors associated with happiness in the context of Society 5.0, using the panel data analysis method for 8 OECD countries between the years 2007-2019. In the study, it has been found that there is a statistically significant and positive relationship between GDP per capita and happiness. In addition, it was found that there is a statistically significant and positive relationship between human capital and happiness. It has been determined that there is a significant and positive relationship between renewable energy consumption and happiness. The happiness index, which is the dependent variable in the study, is explained by all other independent variables at the rate of 89 %.
Given the growing popularity of biometrics, doubts about the conditions for biometric data processing can be noticed in practice. These inaccuracies take place in various areas of law, including labour law. This article provides a theoretical discussion on the processing of special categories of data. It aims to point to the need for appropriate legal regulations to ensure the security of the processing of biometric data of employees and candidate employees. The article starts with clarifying the concept of biometric data and discusses the practical aspects of the use of biometric tools. Further on, the author analyses the legal regulations concerning the processing of biometric data in the relations between the employer as the personal data controller and the employee as the data subject. As a result of the studies carried out, a position was presented which indicates that the employer who processes biometric data of employees and candidates for employment should always find out whether he has legal justification to process the data in question. This article is one of the few studies on the processing of biometric data in Polish literature on the subject. The main purpose hereof is to present situations under the current legislation, in which the employer can process biometric data of its employees. The article is a form of universal presentation of the problem and may be of interest especially to legal practitioners. ; Z uwagi na wzrost popularności technik biometrycznych w praktyce można zauważyć pojawiające się wątpliwości dotyczące przesłanek warunkujących przetwarzanie danych biometrycznych. Przedmiotowe nieścisłości pojawiają się na gruncie różnych dziedzin prawa, w tym na gruncie prawa pracy. Niniejszy artykuł zawiera rozważania teoretyczne dotyczące przetwarzania danych szczególnej kategorii. Jego celem jest zwrócenie uwagi na potrzebę stworzenia odpowiednich regulacji prawnych służących zapewnieniu bezpieczeństwa przetwarzania danych biometrycznych pracowników oraz kandydatów do pracy. Artykuł rozpoczyna się od wyjaśnienia pojęcia danych biometrycznych oraz traktuje o praktycznych stronach wykorzystania narzędzi biometrycznych. W dalszej części autorka poddaje analizie regulacje prawne dotyczące przetwarzania danych biometrycznych w relacjach pomiędzy pracodawcą jako administratorem danych osobowych a pracownikiem jako podmiotem, którego dane są przetwarzane. W wyniku przeprowadzonych badań zaprezentowane zostało stanowisko wskazujące, że pracodawca przetwarzający dane biometryczne zatrudnionych pracowników oraz kandydatów do pracy powinien każdorazowo ustalać, czy dysponuje przewidzianą przez przepisy prawa przesłanką legalizującą przetwarzanie tych danych. Niniejszy artykuł jest jedną z niewielu prac w polskim dorobku piśmienniczym na temat przetwarzania danych biometrycznych. Głównym celem jest zaprezentowanie sytuacji, w których pracodawca może zgodnie z aktualnie obowiązującym stanem prawnym przetwarzać dane biometryczne swoich pracowników. Artykuł stanowi formę uniwersalnego przedstawienia problemu i może być przedmiotem zainteresowania zwłaszcza praktyków prawa.
The article discusses the problem of the reform of the system of the protection of personal data in the context of changes, new tasks and challenges faced by the European data protection authorities, in particular the European Data Protection Supervisor, Article 29 Working Group or the national supervisory authorities. The proposals of regulations and directives submitted in recent years by the European Commission related to data protection in general, as well as the specific rules governing the functioning of the EU agencies involved in the fight against crime clearly show that the proposed changes are intended to increase the role of these bodies at both the E. U. and the national level by ensuring a more effective implementation of the new rules. The planned strengthening of the relationship between the national authorities as well as the coordination of their activities also aims to meet this objective.