This book explores challenges to international conflict resolution efforts in the South Caucasus. It examines the efforts made by the UN, the OSCE, and the EU, and by the states of Russia, Turkey, and the United States. The conflict is analyzed through the theoretical frameworks of neorealism, constructivism, and neoclassical realism.
Access options:
The following links lead to the full text from the respective local libraries:
The peace that has been made by the disputing parties, in the presence of a notary with a notarial deed, is expected to end the dispute, provide legal certainty between those who are in dispute. The peace deed is also expected to provide legal certainty, benefit and provide justice between those who are in dispute and for their future descendants. Thus it will create a calm life, peace and harmony between those who are at odds. However, if the peace deed that has been made between them, especially what has been made before a notary with a notarized peace deed, can then be disputed again, the problem raised in this study is the legal force of the peace deed made by a notary in an effort to resolve civil law conflicts in Indonesia. In the example case of the Gianyar District Court decision No. 54/Pdt.G/2015/PN.Gir. To answer these problems, normative juridical legal research methods are used with prescriptive research methods. The results of the analysis and research are that the binding power of a notarial peace deed in proof is a deed that has the power of a judge's decision at the final level. The peace deed that was made was also useless and violated the sense of justice of the parties who made it in good faith. Of course this will also cause doubts both among the parties and in society. Therefore, understanding and clarity are needed regarding the nature of the peace itself and the binding power of the notarized peace deed in proof in court. Extensive knowledge so that the word published does not cause problems in the future for the parties involved.
In: Orient: deutsche Zeitschrift für Politik, Wirtschaft und Kultur des Orients = German journal for politics, economics and culture of the Middle East, Volume 28, Issue 4, p. 519-532
A brief history of international efforts to control cannabis in the twentieth century is presented. The Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs is discussed and analyzed with respect to its provision on cannabis, and various alternatives are discussed by which cannabis could be legally regulated and taxed both within the framework of the Convention and by its modification. A short history of international efforts to reform cannabis laws is presented with emphasis on the United Nations. Finally, the Commission on Narcotic Drugs' policy with regard to cannabis is discussed and analyzed.