Suchergebnisse

[2], 14 p. ; Attributed to Williams by Wing and NUC pre-1956 imprints. ; "Perused and allowed according to order." ; Imperfect: print show-through. ; Reproduction of original in the Harvard University Library.

1 sheet ([1] p.) ; Title from caption and opening lines of text. ; Signed and dated at end: Saturday November 12. 1653. John Thurloe, Secr. ; Reproduction of the original in the British Library.

12 p. ; A reply to: Ley, John. Light for smoke (Wing L1883). ; Annotation on Thomason copy: "Aprill 17th". ; Reproduction of the original in the British Library.

In 1619 the Protestants met in Assembly at Loudun. The Assembly proposed prohibiting Catholic preaching in their cities. This Arrest commands all government officials to allow the preaching of any religious order whatsoever sent by Bishops of the Diocese. ; Electronic reproduction ; 8 p. ; 16 cm.

[6], 36 p. ; Attributed to Peter Heylyn. Cf. BM. ; Signed: E.Y. ; Reproduction of original in Huntington Library.

1 broadside. ; At head of title: God saue the King. ; Date of imprint suggested by STC (2nd ed.). ; "Given vnder oure signet at Edinburgh the twentie sext day of Julie, and of reigne the first yeere. 1625." ; Reproduction of original in the Town House (Aberdeen, Scotland). Charter Room.

[2], 30 p. ; A reissue, with cancel t.p., of his Of resisting the lawfull magistrate upon colour of religion, London, 1643. ; Reproduction of original in Huntington Library.

[2], 6 p. ; Annotation on Thomason copy: "1640" with the zero crossed out; and "1641". ; Reproduction of the original in the British Library.

[2], 10 p. ; Written by Francis Bacon. Cf. BM. ; Reproduction of original in the University of Illinois (Urbana-Champaign Campus). Library.

10 p. ; Imperfect: Print show through with some loss of print. ; Reproduction of original in the Harvard University.

Based on two studies with Bosniak and Croatian students in Bosnia and Herzegovina, this paper analyzes the effects of religiosity on intergroup forgiveness and reconciliation. Both Christianity and Islam advance forgiveness and reconciliation as one of the major moral imperatives. Previous studies also indicate that religiosity can increase readiness to grant forgiveness on the inter-personal level and facilitate rapprochement. When it comes to inter-group level, prescripts of religious piety often conflict with norms of group solidarity and care. Another set of research suggests that religion obstructs conflict transformation due to the dogmatic reasoning it promotes, including reframing of immanent disputes in transcendental (and thus non-negotiable) terms. This study initially tested whether adding religious symbols to conflict narratives impacts prosocial attitudes of respondents and came with negative results. In other words, adding religious codes to already known narratives about conflicts did not have a significant impact on participants' attitudes. In a subsequent SEM analysis, it was found that religiosity in both groups is strongly correlated with group-centricity, which negatively mediates its relationship with both forgiveness and reconciliation. We conclude that collectivistic forms of religiosity that privilege ingroup solidarity might have negative effects on intergroup forgiveness and reconciliation in post-conflict settings.

Based on two studies with Bosniak and Croatian students in Bosnia and Herzegovina, this paper analyzes the effects of religiosity on intergroup forgiveness and reconciliation. Both Christianity and Islam advance forgiveness and reconciliation as one of the major moral imperatives. Previous studies also indicate that religiosity can increase readiness to grant forgiveness on the inter-personal level and facilitate rapprochement. When it comes to inter-group level, prescripts of religious piety often conflict with norms of group solidarity and care. Another set of research suggests that religion obstructs conflict transformation due to the dogmatic reasoning it promotes, including reframing of immanent disputes in transcendental (and thus non-negotiable) terms. This study initially tested whether adding religious symbols to conflict narratives impacts prosocial attitudes of respondents and came with negative results. In other words, adding religious codes to already known narratives about conflicts did not have a significant impact on participants' attitudes. In a subsequent SEM analysis, it was found that religiosity in both groups is strongly correlated with group-centricity, which negatively mediates its relationship with both forgiveness and reconciliation. We conclude that collectivistic forms of religiosity that privilege ingroup solidarity might have negative effects on intergroup forgiveness and reconciliation in post-conflict settings.

[8] p. ; Reproduction of original in Thomason Collection, British Library.

1 sheet ([1] p.) ; Annotation on Thomason copy: "Aprill 1st". ; Reproduction of the original in the British Library.

1 sheet ([1] p.) ; Signed and dated: Given under my hand and Seal at Armes, this twenty fourth day of April. 1643. Essex. ; At end of document: It is his Excellencies pleasure that this Proclamation be forthwith printed. Rob: Chambers, Secr. ; Annotation on Thomason copy: "May. 8.". ; Reproduction of the original in the British Library.