Search results

The article
is devoted to studying the perception of a literary text
(hereinafter referred to as LT), which is relevant for the current state of literature
research, as projected on the theoretical prerequisites of the domestic prehistory of
European receptive aesthetics. Russian philology has developed two approaches to
LT — the psychological ("Russian psychological school" by A.A. Potebnya and his
followers) and the purely formal ("Russian formal school" of the language — OPOYAZ) ones. Cognitive poetics as the mainstream modern fi eld of literature studies
combines these approaches in the light of the goals that it sets for itself: the study of
both the formal and semantic organization of the text and its understanding by the
reader. Th e focus of the study into a work of literature is its understanding, therefore,
the meaning of the text turns out to be a scientific priority, as well as the development
of algorithms for its reconstruction in the reader's perception. In this regard, the
terminological apparatus is of particular importance, assuming the differentiation
of the terms of the triad "apprehension-perception-reception". Studying reader's
perception particularly focuses on L.S. Vygotsky's concept of the influence of the
text's rhythm on reader.

The second part of the article is devoted to the phenomenon of surprise, which is significant for studying the reader's perception of a literary text (CT) and for understanding estrangement (ostranneniе) not only as a literary device, but also as a certain state of the reader's consciousness. In the ambiguous interpretation of this state of the human psyche, taken in the status of both basic emotion and intellectual assessment, by modern psychology, there is no contradiction, since an attempt to understand the world is accompanied by the experience of an intentional object, if it does not begin with it. However, the new, the unknown, being the objectcause of surprise as an intellectual-cognitive state of consciousness, induces opposite emotional reactions in different people - like (acceptance up to delight) and hostility (rejection up to irritation). It is these emotional epiphenomena of surprise that can serve as an argument for distinguishing within the considered intellectual state «surprise+», when the new causes emotional acceptance and intellectual interest, and «surprise-», when the new causes such emotional rejection that leaves no room for the cognitive aspirations of the mind. Speech examples of the emotional ambivalence of surprise are presented both in Russian and in other languages. Particular attention is paid to the connection between the concept of 'surprise' and the concept of 'estrangement' (ostranneniе), as well as their connection with the author's position. Th e formation of the text also has a cognitive-aesthetic reason, which consists in the author's understanding of life through surprise in its two forms - acceptance and rejection (as a rule, in their complex interweaving), and a formalaesthetic goal, confirmed by draft s. The study of the material made it possible to come to the conclusion that the surprise of the author (in any of the author's artistic incarnations) with his diametrically opposed epiphenomena is the reason for the estrangement as a verbal-compositional embodiment of this mode of consciousness in CT. At the same time, «surprise-» dominates and the method of estrangement adequate to it in the linguistic embodiment given within the framework of this type of surprise.

The second part of the article is devoted to the phenomenon of surprise,
which is significant for studying the reader's perception of a literary text (CT) and
for understanding estrangement (ostrannenie) not only as a literary device, but also
as a certain state of the reader's consciousness. In the ambiguous interpretation of
this state of the human psyche, taken in the status of both basic emotion and intellectual assessment, by modern psychology, there is no contradiction, since an attempt
to understand the world is accompanied by the experience of an intentional object,
if it does not begin with it. However, the new, the unknown, being the object-cause
of surprise as an intellectual-cognitive state of consciousness, induces opposite
emotional reactions in different people — like (acceptance up to delight) and hostility (rejection up to irritation). It is these emotional epiphenomena of surprise that
can serve as an argument for distinguishing within the considered intellectual state
«surprise+», when the new causes emotional acceptance and intellectual interest,
and «surprise–», when the new causes such emotional rejection that leaves no room
for the cognitive aspirations of the mind. Speech examples of the emotional ambivalence of surprise are presented both in Russian and in other languages. Particular attention is paid to the connection between the concept of 'surprise' and the
concept of 'estrangement' (ostrannenie), as well as their connection with the author's
position. The formation of the text also has a cognitive-aesthetic reason, which
consists in the author's understanding of life through surprise in its two forms —
acceptance and rejection (as a rule, in their complex interweaving), and a formal-aesthetic goal, confirmed by draft s. The study of the material made it possible to come
to the conclusion that the surprise of the author (in any of the author's artistic incarnations) with his diametrically opposed epiphenomena is the reason for the estrangement as a verbal-compositional embodiment of this mode of consciousness
in CT. At the same time, «surprise–» dominates and the method of estrangement
adequate to it in the linguistic embodiment given within the framework of this type
of surprise.

The paper presents an unknown Russian translation of a rare Polish political satire from 1688 on political intrigues at the court of King Jan Sobieski. Both the Polish original and the Russian translation are published with detailed historical and linguistic comments. ; Rysk forskningsprojekt: RGNF 14-04-00128

Igor Sergeev erweist sich als umsichtiger Manager beim Umbau und der Reduzierung der russischen Streitkräfte. Gleichzeitig versucht er deren Effizienz zu optimieren, was allerdings Opfer von den Betroffenen erfordert