Search results

The twentieth century has been called, not inaccurately, a century of genocide. And the beginning of the twenty-first century has seen little change, with genocidal violence in Darfur, Congo, Sri Lanka, and Syria. Why is genocide so widespread, and so difficult to stop, across societies that differ so much culturally, technologically, and politically? [-]That's the question that this collection addresses, gathering a stellar roster of contributors to offer a range of perspectives from different disciplines to attempt to understand the pervasiveness of genocidal violence. Challenging outdated beliefs and conventions that continue to influence our understanding, Genocide constitutes a major contribution to the scholarship on mass violence.[-]

Intro -- title page -- copyright page -- 1. What Is Genocide? -- 2. Has There Always Been Genocide? -- 3. What Are the Causes of Genocide? -- 4. Infamous Genocides -- 5. How Does Genocide Affect People? -- 6. Can Genocide be Stopped? -- Appendix: Genocide by Continent, Since 1900 -- International Organizations -- Series Glossary -- Further Reading -- Internet Resources -- Index -- Untitled -- Blank Page.

"In 1948, the United Nations established the Genocide Convention to legally define genocide as actions intended to destroy a particular group of people based on race, religion, ethnicity, and other defining characteristics. The goal was to prevent and punish future acts of genocide, but a number of mass killings have followed since its establishment, and in some situations whether these executions qualify as genocides is surprisingly unclear. The viewpoints in this title explore what genocide is and isn't, as well as historical and contemporary examples of genocide. They also examine potential political and social solutions to prevent future genocides"--

"Genocide" published on by Oxford University Press.

Cover Page -- Half Title Page -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Contents -- Foreword -- Introduction -- Chapter 1: Recognizing and Defining Genocide -- 1. The International Definitions of Genocide Are Being Challenged -- 2. The United States Defines Genocide in a Way That Suits Its Interests -- 3. Israel Should Encourage a Greater Understanding of the Universality of Genocide -- 4. England Should Recognize the Armenian Genocide -- 5. Germany Has Not Recognized Armenian Genocide Because of the Political Implications -- 6. Turkey's Denial of Armenian Genocide Is Holding It Back -- 7. The Srebrenica Massacre Fits the Definition of Genocide -- 8. Lithuania's Push for a Genocide Law Is Appalling -- Periodical and Internet Sources Bibliography -- Chapter 2: Contemporary Accounts of Genocide -- 1. The Democratic Republic of the Congo Is Devastated by Chronic Genocide -- 2. Western Sahara Genocide Is Being Ignored by the European Union -- 3. Sri Lanka Committed Genocide of Its Tamil Minority -- 4. Sudan's South Kordofan Province Is Devastated by a Renewed Genocide -- 5. Israel Is Committing an Ongoing Genocide of the Palestinian People -- 6. Uganda Is Sanctioning a Gay Genocide -- Periodical and Internet Sources Bibliography -- Chapter 3: Preventing and Prosecuting Genocide -- 1. Rwanda: Mixed Legacy for Community-Based Genocide Courts -- 2. Rwanda's "Genocidal Ideology" Law Is Too Restrictive -- 3. Cambodian Trials of Former Khmer Rouge Soldiers Stir Up Controversy -- 4. Iran Must Face the Consequences of Its Attempts to Incite Genocide -- 5. Canada Should Support the UN in Preventing Mass Violence -- Periodical and Internet Sources Bibliography -- Chapter 4: The Legacy of Genocide -- 1. Rwanda Is Moving Forward from the 1994 Genocide -- 2. The Rwanda Genocide Led to More Aggressive International Justice Efforts

Cover -- Title Page -- Other Books in the At Issue Series -- Copyright -- Contents -- Introduction -- 1. We Must Commit to the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide -- 2. Turkey Must Acknowledge and Remember the Armenian Genocide -- 3. Stalin's Genocide by Famine in Ukraine Deserves Public Recognition -- 4. The Time to Remember the Holocaust Is Also the Time to Act -- 5. Intent to Destroy Must Be Proven in the Genocide Case Against Myanmar -- 6. Lessons to Avoid Another Darfur Genocide -- 7. American Involvement Is Critical to Genocide Prevention -- 8. Life Force Atrocities Are Early Indicators of Genocide -- 9. War Produces Conditions for Genocide -- 10. Hannah Arendt Was Wrong: Nazi Evil Was Not Banal -- 11. Recognition of the Armenian Genocide Could Strengthen Turkey's Position -- 12. Auschwitz Evidence Causes Judge to Rule Against David Irving, Holocaust Denier -- 13. The Internet Must Be the New Battleground Against Holocaust Denial -- 14. Early Warning Signs of Genocide Are Possible to Detect -- 15. UN Peacekeepers May Thwart Missions Through Their Own Violence -- 16. To Effectively Address Genocides, International Law Must Be Decolonized -- 17. Ordinary People Can Perpetrate Genocides -- 18. Surviving Genocide in Colonial Namibia -- 19. The United States Is Complicit in the Saudi-Led Genocide in Yemen -- Organizations to Contact -- Bibliography -- Index -- Back Cover.

Genocide is a topic beset by ambiguities over meaning and double standards. In this stimulating and gripping history, William Rubinstein sets out to clarify the meaning of the term genocide and its historical evolution, and provides a working definition that informs the rest of the book. He makes the important argument that each instance of genocide is best understood within a particular historical framework and provides an original chronology of these distinct frameworks. In the final part of the book he critically examines a number of alleged past and recent genocides: from native Americans

Genocidal tendencies that exist today are due to the embrace of realpolitik and the glorification of the state. Unrestrained nationalism can only lead to mass killing with conviction and pure heart. Genocide is the commission of specific acts with intent to destroy, wholly o r in part, a national ethnic, racial o r religious group. There are many cases of genocide today which the U.S. ignores because it makes anti‐Sovietism the centerpiece of I t s foreign policy. International law is not enough to prevent genocide. Natural law and the judgements at Nuremberg as well are not sufficient. The problem is one of individuals who must reduce their loyalty to the state as the dominant imperative of political life. Only then will realpolitik be controlled.