Search results

Bilo da je riječ o površnim poznavateljima povijesti ili profesionalnim povjesničarima, kod spomena plemstva u Međimurju prva pomisao biti će grofovi Zrinski, veliki junaci hrvatske i mađarske povijesti, koji su sredinom 16. stoljeća pretvorili Čakovec u svoj matični posjed. Međutim, taj je prostor nakon stabilizacije granice sa Štajerskom bio dom najuglednijim i najbogatijim plemićkim rodovima i obiteljima Ugarskog kraljevstva. Kroz ovaj ćemo rad kronološki popratiti njihove sudbine na prostoru današnjeg Međimurja, ali i šire. Prvi od takvih je rod Haholda, koji je i najzaslužniji za stabilnost na tom području. U njihovo vrijeme u ispravama pronalazimo i starosjedilačko plemstvo Međimurja, kraljeve graničare ili gradokmete, koji s novopridošlim rodom ubrzo ulaze u sukob, a nakon toga, po svemu sudeći, i u njihovu službu. Uvidjet ćemo da je upravo član tog roda ostavio ime središtu županije. Jednu ćemo granu tog roda na promatranom prostoru pratiti sve do kraja srednjeg vijeka. U zadnjoj četvrtini 13. stoljeća, granični je prostor doživio novu destabilizaciju i pustošenja, a samo Međimurje na određeno razdoblje palo u ruke štajerskog kapetana. Nakon što je 1328. vraćeno ugarskom kralju, vlastelinstvo je očito bilo u lošem stanju i tek 1350. godine nalazi novog stalnog vlasnika u obitelji Lacković. U hrvatskoj su povijesti Lackovići najpoznatiji po sukobu sa Sigismundom Luksemburškim, koji je završen u Križevcima, poznatim Krvavim saborom na kojem Stjepan Čakovečki biva ubijen. Nakon Lackovića, posjed uživa obitelj Sečenji, koja potječe od hrvatskog plemenitog roda Kačića. Sečenjiji se nisu dugo zadržali i najvećim djelom 15. stoljeća posjedom gospodare znameniti Celjski, a kasnije umjesto njih njihov kapetan Fridrik Lamberg. Završit ćemo s Ernuštima, skorojevićima kralja Matije Korvina, i time zaključiti zanimljivu povijest srednjeg vijeka prostora Međimurja. ; The first association, when talking about noble families in Međimurje, no matter if you are historian or just history enthusiast are Counts Zrinski. Zrinski were great heroes of Croatian and Hungarian history and they made Čakovec their primary possession. But it should be said that after the stabilization of border with Štajerska, Međimurje was home to many prominent and wealthy noble families from Hungarian kingdom. Throughout this Thesis we will analyze faiths of these above written noble families that had their assets in Međimurje. First such noble family was kindred of Haholds. They are responsible for stability in Međimurje. In their time, documents mention indigenous nobility of Međimurje, royal border guards or "iobagioni castri", who entered into conflict with newcomers and after that, apparently, in their service. We will see that one of the members of this family is responsible for giving name to center of this county. In the last quarter of 13th century, border area was again destabilized and desolated. In that time, Međimurje fell into hands of captain of Štajerska. After the year of 1328 it is returned to king of Hungaria and seigniory was apparently in bad shape. New owners of Međimurje were family Lacković. They claimed their right to Međimurje in the year of 1350. In Croatian history, family Lacković was best known because of their conflict with king Sigismund which ended with famous Bloody Parliament in Križevci when Stephen of Čakovec was killed. After the family of Lacković new owner were family Sečenji which are derived from Croatian noble family Kačići. They did not stay long on this area.For the most part of 15th century owner of Međimurje are family Celjski and after them, their captain Fridrik Lamberg. Last analized noble family are Ernušti and with them we finish this analysis of rather interesting medieval history in Međimuje.

U tekstu se raspravlja nekoliko primjeraka oružja i ratničke opreme s Bribirske glavice. Prema mome mišljenju, značajni su za razumijevanje ukupne bribirske prošlosti, a riječ je o željeznom križolikom okovu i ukrašenom stremenu s konjske orme te o ostatcima četiriju željeznih buzdovana. Na žalost, ni za jednoga od njih nemamo pobližih podataka o okolnostima nalaza. Navedeni primjerci oružja i konjaničke opreme u mnogome dopunjavaju sliku bribirske prošlosti od 9. do 12. stoljeća, no svojim kulturološkim pokazateljima nisu izišli iz okvira kakav nam je za taj lokalitet poznat od ranije i prema drugim nalazima ranoga srednjeg vijeka. Tipološkokronološkom analizom pokušao sam pokazati različite utjecaje pod kojima su ti predmeti nastajali ili su izravno importirani iz tadašnjih većih radioničkih centara u srednjoj Europi i Bizantskome Carstvu. Njihova kvaliteta i vrsnoća izrade vrlo dokumentarno svjedoči visoku razinu života na Bribiru u stoljećima u kojima su nobiles Breberienses započeli svoj gospodarski, vojni i politički uspon. ; The text discusses several items of weaponry and combat equipment from Bribirska Glavica. In our opinion, they are significant for the understanding of the overall past of Bribir. They comprise an iron crossshaped mounting and an ornamented stirrup from horse tack as well as the remains of four iron maces. Unfortunately, we have no very detailed information about the circumstances of the finds for any of them. These items of weaponry and harness do add a great deal to the picture of the Bribir past, from the 9th to the 12th century, and yet in their fundamental cultural indicators they do not depart from the framework that we know of for this site, from earlier work, and from other finds of the early medieval period. Analysis in terms of typology and chronology was used to try to show the different influences on the making of these objects or their direct import from the then bigger workshop centres in Central Europe and the Byzantine Empire. Their quality and excellence of workmanship tellingly documents the high level of life in Bribir in the centuries in which the nobiles Brberienses started their economic, military and political rise.

Today Europeanization is a notion that is frequently used; however, there is a clear shortage of, or even fragmentariness of scientific knowledge, within this scope. The research into the Europeanization processes were initiated by political scientists in the 1970s, although the notion itself only gained popularity in the 1990s alongside the realization of the commom European market. From that moment, Europeanization is a research problem that has attracted interest in numerous fields and scientific disciplines. David Floyd [2001, p. 109] emphasizes the fact that the majority of market changes which have occurred since the beginning of the twenty-first century took place as a result of Europeanization processes which are explicite, defined as the phenomenon of the regionalization processes. As Neil Fligstein [2009, p. 107] highlights, the "majority of the research concerning the European integration focuses only on political and legal processes (…) which is the reason for which researchers overlook the fact how deep the European economy has been reorganized". There are few works of the kind cited above, nor have there been many recent papers seeking to undertake broad and deep research into the Europeanization processes in both economic (including macro- and microeconomic fields) and noneconomic dimensions.