1696 results
Sort by:
In: Nordisk kulturpolitisk tidskrift: The Nordic journal of cultural policy, Volume 17, Issue 2, p. 168-186
ISSN: 2000-8325
In: Tidsskrift for kjønnsforskning, Volume 33, Issue 1-2, p. 100-108
ISSN: 1891-1781
In: Stat & styring, Volume 16, Issue 1, p. 12-12
ISSN: 0809-750X
In: Teologisk tidsskrift, Volume 5, Issue 4, p. 324-339
ISSN: 1893-0271
In: Teologisk tidsskrift, Volume 5, Issue 4, p. 440-441
ISSN: 1893-0271
In: Nordisk kulturpolitisk tidskrift: The Nordic journal of cultural policy, Volume 15, Issue 2, p. 297-301
ISSN: 2000-8325
In: Tidsskrift for kjønnsforskning, Volume 36, Issue 3-4, p. 291-293
ISSN: 1891-1781
In: Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning: TfS = Norwegian journal of social research, Volume 52, Issue 4, p. 581-584
ISSN: 1504-291X
In: Nordisk kulturpolitisk tidskrift: The Nordic journal of cultural policy, Volume 16, Issue 2, p. 178-200
ISSN: 2000-8325
In: Tidsskrift for teologi og kirke, Volume 81, Issue 4, p. 311-313
ISSN: 1504-2952
In: Teologisk tidsskrift, Volume 12, Issue 4, p. 291-292
ISSN: 1893-0271
In: Tidsskrift for kjønnsforskning, Volume 40, Issue 3-4, p. 87-90
ISSN: 1891-1781
In: Arctic review on law and politics, Volume 9, p. 267-286
ISSN: 2387-4562
Since Russia's annexation of Crimea in 2014, Northern Europe has increasingly aligned its national defence arrangements with the United States and NATO. This contrasts with the Cold War period, when Sweden and Finland were neutral, and Norway and Denmark put self-imposed restraints on their NATO memberships. Providing Northern Europe with a stable "buffer" between East and West, this so-called Nordic balance kept the United States and Soviet Union at an arm's length. Since 2014 however, Northern Europe has de facto slid from "buffer" to "springboard" for US forces. This slide may counter Russian assertiveness, but there is also reason to argue that it may increase regional tension and unpredictability. If so, this may leave the entire region with less rather than more security. Using the case of Norway, it is argued that too close an alignment with NATO may have accelerated Norway's role as a "springboard" for US forces. This is because cost-intensive reforms needed to accommodate US expectations abroad have also exacerbated critical vulnerabilities at home. Increased dependency on US forces thereby makes difficult the balance between deterrence and restraint vis-à-vis Russia.
In: Teologisk tidsskrift, Volume 1, Issue 4, p. 437-440
ISSN: 1893-0271