Search results

This paper analyses the influence of ideologies on political discourse, in terms not only of content but also of form and interaction, defining ideology in the broadest sense of basic beliefs shared by members of a group and understanding political discourse to be a class of genres defined by a social domain, namely that of politics. The ways in which ideologically based beliefs are exhibited in discourse and discursive evidence in the interplay of several ideologies are analysed in the form of a debate on asylum seekers in the British House of Commons. Parliamentary debates are particularly revealing for these purposes because their text and content exhibit the social cognitions of political parties and their members. An analysis of this particular debate shows how political discourse in general, and parliamentary debates in particular, are replete with ideological expressions and rhetorical tropes at all levels. ; This paper analyses the influence of ideologies on political discourse, in terms not only of content but also of form and interaction, defining ideology in the broadest sense of basic beliefs shared by members of a group and understanding political discourse to be a class of genres defined by a social domain, namely that of politics. The ways in which ideologically based beliefs are exhibited in discourse and discursive evidence in the interplay of several ideologies are analysed in the form of a debate on asylum seekers in the British House of Commons. Parliamentary debates are particularly revealing for these purposes because their text and content exhibit the social cognitions of political parties and their members. An analysis of this particular debate shows how political discourse in general, and parliamentary debates in particular, are replete with ideological expressions and rhetorical tropes at all levels.

This paper analyses the influence of ideologies on political discourse, in terms not only of content but also of form and interaction, defining ideology in the broadest sense of basic beliefs shared by members of a group and understanding political discourse to be a class of genres defined by a social domain, namely that of politics. The ways in which ideologically based beliefs are exhibited in discourse and discursive evidence in the interplay of several ideologies are analysed in the form of a debate on asylum seekers in the British House of Commons. Parliamentary debates are particularly revealing for these purposes because their text and content exhibit the social cognitions of political parties and their members. An analysis of this particular debate shows how political discourse in general, and parliamentary debates in particular, are replete with ideological expressions and rhetorical tropes at all levels. ; This paper analyses the influence of ideologies on political discourse, in terms not only of content but also of form and interaction, defining ideology in the broadest sense of basic beliefs shared by members of a group and understanding political discourse to be a class of genres defined by a social domain, namely that of politics. The ways in which ideologically based beliefs are exhibited in discourse and discursive evidence in the interplay of several ideologies are analysed in the form of a debate on asylum seekers in the British House of Commons. Parliamentary debates are particularly revealing for these purposes because their text and content exhibit the social cognitions of political parties and their members. An analysis of this particular debate shows how political discourse in general, and parliamentary debates in particular, are replete with ideological expressions and rhetorical tropes at all levels.

This paper analyses the influence of ideologies on political discourse, in terms not only of content but also of form and interaction, defining ideology in the broadest sense of basic beliefs shared by members of a group and understanding political discourse to be a class of genres defined by a social domain, namely that of politics. The ways in which ideologically based beliefs are exhibited in discourse and discursive evidence in the interplay of several ideologies are analysed in the form of a debate on asylum seekers in the British House of Commons. Parliamentary debates are particularly revealing for these purposes because their text and content exhibit the social cognitions of political parties and their members. An analysis of this particular debate shows how political discourse in general, and parliamentary debates in particular, are replete with ideological expressions and rhetorical tropes at all levels.

Call for Abstracts für a Special Issue of Industrielle Beziehungen – The German Journal of Industrial Relations. Deadline: June 1, 2023

Der vorliegende Bericht ist die Langfassung eines Teiles der empirischen Studie "Student 79" des Zentralinstituts für Jugendforschung der DDR. Er beschäftigt sich mit dem Themenkomplex Studenten und Ideologie. Die Differenzierung der Daten erfolgte in der Studie nach einem einzigen Kriterium und zwar dem der Fachzugehörigkeit (Sektionszugehörigkeit). Die Darstellung der Sektionsunterschiede vollzieht sich in der Darstellung verkürzter Tabellen und mittels Rangfolgen. Im einzelnen werden die Ergebnisse folgender Themenbereiche dargestellt: (1) Einstellung zur SED; (2) Einstellung zur DDR; (3) Verbundenheit mit der Sowjetunion; (4) Verbundenheit mit der sozialistischen Staatengemeinschaft; (5) Einstellung zur Bundesrepublik Deutschland; (6) Einstellung zum Sozialismus; (7) atheistische Weltanschauung; (8) Zusammenhang der ideologischen Einstellungen untereinander; (9) Vergleich zur Studie U 79; (10) Vergleich zur Studie Student 69; (11) politisches Interesse, Rezeption von Massenmedien; (12) Geschichtsinteresse; (13) Einstellungen zur FDJ. (ICC)