Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia
In: Mezinárodní vztahy: Czech journal of international relations, Volume 47, Issue 3, p. 102-107
ISSN: 0543-7989, 0323-1844
483 results
Sort by:
In: Mezinárodní vztahy: Czech journal of international relations, Volume 47, Issue 3, p. 102-107
ISSN: 0543-7989, 0323-1844
In: Politologický časopis, Volume 16, Issue 1, p. 77-79
ISSN: 1211-3247
In: Mezinárodní vztahy: Czech journal of international relations, Volume 42, Issue 4, p. 5-28
ISSN: 0543-7989, 0323-1844
This article offers a critical review of the few existing scholarly attempts to conceptualize & theorize the study of peacekeeping operations. It reveals that even though the study of peacekeeping operations is burgeoning, most of the available literature is idiosyncratic & atheoretical. Although some authors have recently utilized various concepts from international relations theory for analysis of peacekeeping operations, the potentially diverse international peacekeeping theories are yet to be fully integrated into international relations theory. After inspecting future research agendas outlined by the leading experts in the field, the author critiques the recent calls for a "macrotheory" of international peacekeeping. Adapted from the source document.
In: Mezinárodní vztahy: Czech journal of international relations, Volume 38, Issue 4, p. 102-104
ISSN: 0543-7989, 0323-1844
In: Mezinárodní vztahy: Czech journal of international relations, Volume 49, Issue 1, p. 83-86
ISSN: 0543-7989, 0323-1844
In: Mezinárodní vztahy: Czech journal of international relations, Volume 41, Issue special, p. 32-37
ISSN: 0543-7989, 0323-1844
This article presents a critical commentary on the debate between M. Louzek & P. Drulak. First, in direct contradiction to Louzek's position, the article argues that "objectivity" in social science is not based on a dogmatic belief in the ability of a particular theory to seize the "truth" of the world-out-there. Instead, the only way to approach the ideal of objectivity in our varied & complex world is to facilitate an open debate between different theoretical positions. The article then discusses the dichotomy between positivism & normativism introduced by Louzek. This dichotomy is artificial; realism is no less "normatively-oriented" than alternative paradigms in international relations theory. However, there is a relevant distinction between analytically-oriented & normatively-oriented theories that is overlooked by Louzek, who wrongly believes that all nonrealist theories of international relations belong to the group of normative theories. Adapted from the source document.
In: Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, Volume 46, Issue 2, p. 301-311
In: Mezinárodní vztahy: Czech journal of international relations, Volume 49, Issue 3, p. 55-59
ISSN: 0543-7989, 0323-1844
In: Mezinárodní vztahy: Czech journal of international relations, Volume 44, Issue 4, p. 126
ISSN: 0543-7989, 0323-1844
In: Mezinárodní vztahy: Czech journal of international relations, Volume 46, Issue 2, p. 115-119
ISSN: 0543-7989, 0323-1844
In: Mezinárodní vztahy: Czech journal of international relations, Volume 45, Issue 3, p. 111-114
ISSN: 0543-7989, 0323-1844
In: Mezinárodní vztahy: Czech journal of international relations, Volume 47, Issue 2, p. 79-83
ISSN: 0543-7989, 0323-1844
In: Mezinárodní vztahy: Czech journal of international relations, Volume 41, Issue special, p. 83-101
ISSN: 0543-7989, 0323-1844
This paper examines the process of EU enlargement using public choice theory. It starts by outlining the history of EU enlargement, & continues by examining the theoretical approaches to European integration. The third section explores the different theoretical perspectives on enlargement, after which the fourth section explains the use of public choice theory in international relations. The fifth section offers a cost-benefits analysis of enlargement, & the final section analyses the functions of citizens & politicians. Adapted from the source document.
In: Politologicky Casopis, Volume 21, Issue 2, p. 151-152
In: Mezinárodní vztahy: Czech journal of international relations, Volume 39, Issue 2, p. 5-19
ISSN: 0543-7989, 0323-1844
Neoliberal institutionalism, developed by Robert Keohane, & liberal theory of international relations elaborated by Andrew Moravcsik, nowadays represent two grand International Relations (IR) theories drawing on liberalism as one of the main theoretical approaches in this discipline. However, Keohane conceived of neoliberal institutionalism as a synthesis of realism & liberalism & Moravcsik proceeds from a specific understanding of liberalism & defines liberalism by the criteria of empirical social science. This essay examines, therefore, whether neoliberal institutionalism & liberal theory indeed involve & assemble together the main ideas of liberalism. The perspective applied in the essay is based on the intellectual history of liberalism and, in this way, regards the assumptions about the most fundamental actor in international relations & about the evolution of international relations as the intellectual core of liberalism. According to liberalism, individuals & collective social actors constituted by individuals (social & bureaucratic groups) are the most fundamental actors in international relations & international relations undergo transformation, in the course of which cooperation gradually prevails over conflict. Neoliberal institutionalism considers the state to be the most fundamental actor in international relations & assumes that the nature of international relations transforms & they acquire a more cooperative character. Liberal theory claims that individuals & social groups are the most fundamental actors & that international relations undergo transformation that is marked by the growth of cooperation. Consequently, whereas neoliberal institutionalism involves the intellectual core of liberalism only to some extent, liberal theory implies that there is a grand theory that subsumes the main ideas of liberalism. Adapted from the source document.