Nuclear Proliferation and International Security
In: Internasjonal politikk, Volume 65, Issue 3, p. 167-170
ISSN: 0020-577X
21 results
Sort by:
In: Internasjonal politikk, Volume 65, Issue 3, p. 167-170
ISSN: 0020-577X
In: Internasjonal politikk, Volume 65, Issue 3, p. 174-179
ISSN: 0020-577X
In: Internasjonal politikk, Volume 65, Issue 4, p. 165-166
ISSN: 0020-577X
In: Internasjonal politikk, Volume 65, Issue 4, p. 151-155
ISSN: 0020-577X
In: Internasjonal politikk, Volume 65, Issue 3, p. 143-156
ISSN: 0020-577X
In: Internasjonal politikk, Volume 65, Issue 1, p. 117-121
ISSN: 0020-577X
In: Internasjonal politikk, Volume 65, Issue 2, p. 141-172
ISSN: 0020-577X
In: Internasjonal politikk, Volume 65, Issue 4, p. 7-20
ISSN: 0020-577X
In: Internasjonal politikk, Volume 65, Issue 2, p. 259-278
ISSN: 0020-577X
Established in 1937, the Norwegian journal Internasjonal politikk (IP) came about as an important part of efforts to establish International Relations as a field of study in Norway. Elsewhere, interest in the field was already evident in the aftermath of the First World War. In response to an approach by the Institute of Intellectual Cooperation in Paris towards members of the Norwegian academic community, a committee for the pursuit of the study of International Relations in Norway was formed in 1936, headed by Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Christian Lous Lange of Norway. From 1937 on, the publication of a Norwegian-language journal of International Relations became a major focus of the work of the committee. Its profile was established in the first issue: the journal was to be "impartial, objective and written in a popular form". Arne Ording, a historian and leading architect of Norway's Second World War and post-war foreign policy, was to be the first editor of Internasjonal Politikk. In 1960, the journal was transferred to the newly established Norwegian Institute of International Affairs (NUPI). Here it became part of the institute's strategy for research on International Relations in general and Norwegian foreign policy in particular, and as an important part of this, research-based public information. Since Internasjonal politikk was not published during the five years of Nazi occupation, it turns 70 in the year of its 65th volume. Adapted from the source document.
In: Internasjonal politikk, Volume 65, Issue 3, p. 143-156
ISSN: 0020-577X
A review essay on books by (1) Mai'a K. Davis Cross, The European Diplomatic Corps. Diplomats and International Cooperation from Westphalia to Maastricht (Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007); (2) Carne Ross, Independent Diplomat: Dispatches from an Unnaccountable Elite (London: Hurst & Co., 2007); (3) Brian Hocking and David Spence [Eds], Foreign Ministries in the European Union: Integrating Diplomats (Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005) & (4) Graham Ziegner [Ed], British Diplomacy: Foreign Secretaries Reflect (London: Politico's, 2007).
In: Internasjonal politikk, Volume 65, Issue 3, p. 9-44
ISSN: 0020-577X
In: Internasjonal politikk, Volume 65, Issue 3, p. 3-7
ISSN: 0020-577X
The Norwegian-based journal International Politics is renewing itself with a new reaction and a new vision: more articles, sharper debate, and tighter international development, while remaining flexible and holding the bar high. The history of the 70 year old journal is discussed with the colorful developments throughout the years. In an anglicizing age, the journal is among the most significant ones in its field, with high citation rankings and a wide audience. L. Pitkaniemi
In: Internasjonal politikk, Volume 65, Issue 4, p. 75-90
ISSN: 0020-577X
In: Internasjonal politikk, Volume 65, Issue 4, p. 123-132
ISSN: 0020-577X
In: Internasjonal politikk, Volume 65, Issue 2, p. 173-203
ISSN: 0020-577X
During the Cold War, the Norwegian Armed Forces were organized to fight an invasion against Norwegian territory. The end of this era should at least in principle imply changes not only in military practices on the ground but also in the training and education of officers. This article analyses the inertia in the internationalization of higher military education programs in Norway, where the strengthening of a subject like International Relations began only at the end of the 1990s. One explanation for the discrepancy between the military curriculum, on the one hand, and the new military environment facing the officers, on the other, is that existing practices were taken for granted and reproduced in social structures. The debate about military education also reflects a traditional conflict between those who have seen an academization of military education as an intervention into the monopoly of knowledge of the officer profession, and those who embraced such a development. Adapted from the source document.